Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
an essay on resolving conflicts
an essay on resolving conflicts
an essay on resolving conflicts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: an essay on resolving conflicts
Goals are defined as, “what does each person want” (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011, p.72) Goals can also so be viewed as, and end or desired result. In regards to goals, we often try to reach and accomplish goals in our relationships. However, we often don’t achieve these goals due to existing conflicts, poor communication, or conflict styles. An ongoing conflict between two parties can be very difficult to handle, especially, when you are dealing with someone who chooses not to acknowledge the conflict. There is an ongoing power struggle based within this conflict, when the other party is taking part in avoidance. Because of that, reaching or achieving your ultimate goal of conflict resolution becomes quite difficult. There are four types of goals Power in conflict may be “designated (power given by your position), distributive (either/or power), and integrative (both/power).” (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011, p.103) My current boss is considered as designated power or when I was a retail store manager. Wilmot and Hocker explain, “Distributive power is over or against the other party.”(Wilmot & Hocker, 2011, p. 102) Ultimately, I have the power to forgive my mother without her needing to apologize and simply moving on. Integrative power focuses on “(both/and) both parties have to achieve something in the relationship” (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011, p. 102). Both my mom and, I must achieve forgiveness towards the other. Power can be at the core of conflict in a relationship. When there is an expressed struggle, within the relationship power is often times at its I learned from completing the “Assessing my Conflict Style” journal assignment that; my overall conflict style is compromise and my mother’s is avoidance. In the conflict, with my mother and myself, I noticed that I’m always the one that’s saying, ok mom I see that you don’t want to talk about our issues. Then, I suggest we communicate our issues at a different time and place, we both agree and it ends there. Needless to say, that is definitely a disadvantage of my compromising conflict style. I end up not getting what I want, which is to have the conversation while, my mother is satisfied because we don’t have the dreaded conversation. This is always the case, with my mother’s avoidance conflict style we never get anywhere. Nonetheless. I’m hopeful because, now she knows that I have been hurting for an extended period of time. I believe it would be beneficial for our conflict if I began to work more on using additional conflict styles. If I, will allow myself to be more accommodating and recognizing that resolving this conflict is not easy for my mother either. I must learn that at times my needs may be secondary, in that moment to possibly make any progress. My mother may be avoiding the issues because she doesn’t quite know how to deal with them. I also recognize that collaborating with my mother and working to find an agreeable solution to
Walmart can be studied using structure functional theory and social conflict theories. Social functional theory is the relationships among parts of society and how these parts are functional(have beneficial consequences) or dysfunctional (have negative consequences. Most Americans today love to shop at Walmart because they continue to give consumers the best prices on over 120,000 products and are one stop shopping.
“We all fight on two fronts, the one facing the enemy, the other facing what we do to the enemy” (Boyden 199).
Conflict theory is an imperative hypothetical custom inside the field of human science. It attests that specific sections of society benefit lopsidedly from set up social and financial plans, which drives them to utilize the state 's coercive constrain in keeping up that disparity. Despite the fact that this origination of force and disservice was initially an absolutely financial viewpoint, racial and ethnic personalities have turned into a necessary piece of conflict theory speculations as they are characterized and examined today.
The theoretical framework in a research relates to the philosophical basis in which the research is executed. It also forms the link between the theoretical aspect of the research and the practical aspect of the investigation. Merten (1998) stated that it “has implications for every decision made in the research process” (p.3). Therefore, the starting point to any research proposal is to identify the methodologies (methods that can be used in the project and as well justify their choice (Crotty, 1998). The methodologies relate to “the strategy, plan of action, processes or design lying behind the choice and use of particular methods, and linking the choice and use of methods to the desired outcomes” (Crotty, 1998, p. 3).
According to the survey that I completed in “The Conflict Style Assessment” found in the Conerly article my style is that of Confronting. I will agree in some degree with the style because I do place a high value on relationship goals and I am assertive and cooperative (Conerly, 2004).
According to Robin (2002), there are five conflict resolution styles: confront compromise, collaborate, accommodate, and avoid. Identify the preference(s) you most often use from these resolution styles. Think about times you have interacted with styles other than your own. Once the differences between these styles are identified, they can be managed, and the appropriateness of when to use them can be determined.
Realistic Conflict Theory As one of the oldest social psychology theories, the Realistic Conflict Theory deals with the conflict and hostility that is projected to arise between individuals or groups competing over the same limited resources. Therefore, as a resource, opportunity, or even goal, becomes harder to obtain, the amount of aggression is projected to increase as well. This theory is not only visible in many everyday situations, but it also establishes a basis for which discrimination and prejudice can be partly explained. The initial study of this theory was conducted in a three-step experiment.
The interpersonal conflict revolves around my mother and I. We have always had a strong relationship but lately, have been at constant odds between each other. There is conflict between us because of our conflicting views on whats the better option for our beloved dog. My mother will always hold the power most of the times by default, she is my mother after all, but when it comes to this specific interpersonal conflict, I certainly hold the power. Other family members know of this dilemma as well including my grandmother who is just as conflicted as my mother and I are. My grandmother has a strong attachment to our dog and would effect her emotionally.
Social conflict theory is a perspective that predicts that when social constraints on antisocial behavior are weakened. In other words social conflict theory is when a group of individuals have most of the power and will try to exploit the law to there fullest before they follow them, leaving the smaller group to obey the law as much as they can. At the same time social conflict theory asks why people follow rules instead of breaking them. Some different perspectives in social conflict theory are the consensus perspective, the pluralist perspective, and the conflict perspective. There are also other theories that support the social conflict theory such as radical criminology, peacemaking criminology, and the left realist criminology, that all prove conflict will happen in order for change to happen.
Almost every conflict situation consists of one party having more power than the other. When the power differential is significant, this usually has a major effect on both the matter and process of the dispute. In order for the outcome of the conflict to be fair, both parties must be relatively equal when it comes to power if resolution of the conflict is to be fair. If one side is far more powerful than another, they are more likely to impose their solution on the weaker party, who in turn will be forced to acquiesce, because they have no other choice.
The dual concern model of conflict resolution is a conceptual perspective that assumes individuals’ preferred method of dealing with conflict is based on two underlying themes or dimensions: concern for self (assertiveness) and concern for others (empathy). According to the model, group members balance their concern for satisfying personal needs and interests with their concern for satisfying the needs and interests of others in different ways. The intersection of these two dimensions ultimately leads individuals towards exhibiting different styles of conflict resolution.According to Anderson (2009), different combinations of these two dimensions result in five different conflict handling styles as displayed in Table
Most decision have more than one potential choice or path, be it a good choice or a poor one. Conflict occurs when there are opposing forces choosing different choices to the same decision tree. Conflict can be, internal to oneself, between individuals, or between groups. This essay will formally define conflict, including stages of conflict and conflict management strategies, through the analysis of a situation where someone’s poor decision with social media may have cost them employment opportunities.
Conflict theory are perspective in sociology psychology that accentuate the social, political, or material inequality of a social group, that analysis the broad socio-political system, or that weaken from structural functionalism and ideological conservatism. With conflict theory, you will see tensions, status, and power are unevenly distributed between groups in society, which these conflicts become the purpose of social change. Conflict theory usually arise due to competition and limited resource that is feed by domination and power, rather than consensus and conformity. This is seen a lot on macro level. As a social worker, you will see and use conflict theory throughout your professional.
There is difficulty assigning a specific method that works best for friends and family because it depends on people's personality. As well as keeping in mind that the relationship between both parties. People are not born with set values and expectations, therefore, their friends and family help define and frame who they are. Usually, those people act in someone's best interest so when conflict occurs addressing an issue can either heal or break relationships. Avoidance is labeled as one of the low conflict resolution styles because of the lack of assertiveness. Positive conflict is ideal so the outcome can be constructive, task-focused, or reduce the problem. However, there is a layer of complexity with friends and family because of the personal investment. Avoiding can be beneficial to some degree as far as reducing stress, saving time or reducing the risk of enhancing the problem. When it comes to friends and family there is a concern about hurting others and disturbing relationships so avoidance is seen as the best option. On the other hand, the lack of communication may harbor resentment between two individuals and increase the original conflict. As a whole, avoidance occasionally works well in long-term friendships or with close family members because there is more attention on building the relationship than fighting. But
We each possess unique ideas, opinions, beliefs, and feelings about specific situations in life. This uniqueness is a large part of what makes us human. Because we all have our own individual way of looking at things, we each have a different viewpoint on what is proper or improper. With all that variation in society conflict is inevitable! Conflict is antagonistic in nature and we all must find ways to work through conflict issues both at work and at home. This paper describes different types of conflict, the influences I personally had in learning to deal with those conflicts, some of the conflicts that I commonly experience, how I go about dealing with those conflicts, and how conflict affects me on a personal level.