Renowned economist, Steven D. Levitt, and well-known journalist, Stephen J. Dubner, in their collaboration of the book, Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything, write in a mostly inoffensive style about extremely controversial topics. Levitt’s and Dubner’s purpose is to inform readers of frequently disputed topics from a purely economic standpoint. They use second person to directly speak to their readers, an impartial tone to show an unusual perspective, and contrast
Written by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, Freakonomics is built upon three major philosophies: incentives are the fundamentals of life, experts on a subject use their knowledge as an advantage to serve their own wellbeing, and orthodox wisdom is wrong most of the time. This book goes into detail to explain the mindsets of humans, from school teachers to sumo wrestlers, through statistics. Levitt and Dubner claim that when the data is closely examined it can relate to more concepts than originally
Yet another argument against Levitt and Dubner is the outcry surrounding the processes used to devise their controversial conclusions. While many opponents challenge the nature of the studies, people like Charles Jobs said their statistical methods were wrong. He illustrates how Freakonomics suggests “socioeconomic situations which violate a normative standard involving real life situations” (Jobs). He cites the naming study, which challenges the fabric of many people’s core beliefs and is viewed
In chapter 4 of Freakonomics, “Where Have All the Criminals Gone?” Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner discuss and argue the possible reasons for the crime drop in the 1990’s, asking and focusing on the question “just where did all those criminals go” (108)? The authors open with a story about the abortion laws in Romania, transitioning into the many factors that could have affected the 1990’s crime drop in America. Some of these factors include the following; Strong economy, increase in police
or wrong. Both authors Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner are honored in their fields and have years of experience as both writers and researchers. Steven D. Levitt graduated from Harvard University in 1989 with a B.A. in Economics and from M.I.T. with a Ph.D in 1994. And worked at the William B. Ogden Distinguished Service Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago. Levitt is one of the greatest economists of our time. Stephen J. Dubner is a well-respected author who has written for
In the novel, “Freakonomics,” by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, many topics and their hidden sides are brought up that not many people think twice about. This book has no one theme. Instead, it is about “stripping a layer or two from the surface of modern life and seeing what is happening underneath.”(Levitt and Dubner, 2005, pg. 11) They are not looking at the surface of common occurrences or issues, but passed what most people see. They explain the hidden side to everything. This ranges from
Freakonomics, written by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, explores the concept of economics through a number of situations that are usually unassociated with the field. This three hundred and thirty-six page book, published by William Morrow and Company in 2005, is comprised of various articles, which focus on the economic aspects behind the obscure circumstances described. Through their analysis, Levitt and Dubner establish a rudimentary foundation for viewing economics in everyday situations
untold stories of life. Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner break common misconceptions of economics by revealing its true science. Freakonomics shatters the view of economics being an arid study of finance and markets. They pull in information to make inferences on past occurrences subtly influence on the present. Freakonomics packs punches with its countless number of tables and figures, serving as concrete data to make their assumptions. Levitt & Dubner in the beginning identify the fundamental
Americanizing his name, he would never truly fit in. That he could never really identify h... ... middle of paper ... ...ries. Because, after all, “it’s not the name that matters. It’s the person who stands behind it” (Kosic 54). Works Cited Dubner, Stephen J., and Steven D. Levitt. "Trading Up: Where Do Baby Names Come From?" Convergences: Themes, Texts, and Images for Composition. Ed. Robert Atwan. 3rd ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2009. 118-21. Print Kosic, Milos. "It's Not the Name That Matters
Incentives can also get someone to pay up their debts but may not always work as planned. In the book Freakonomics by writers, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner reports, “ A killer was respected, feared, talked about. A foot soldier’s incentive was to make a name for himself; J.T.’s incentive was, in effect, to keep the foot soldiers from doing so” (99). The foot soldier’s social incentive is to become
Freakonomics has been an incredibly interesting read and opens up with, what appears to the reader to be, a writing style that somehow personifies the text in a way that only the book itself can articulate. The authors, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, do an amazing job describing basic economic concepts and rules using intriguing and nontypical examples all while entertaining facts and figures that leave the reader with a dropped jaw. The economist, Levitt, received his bachelors degree in
Chapter 1: In the novel of Freakonomics written by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, it clearly shows how economic incentives in our society would make a usual honest person decide to commit the act of cheating. If that person comes across the thought of cheating, it usually is for a personal well being. By that I mean they are obviously doing it for an important reason because normally they would never think about committing an act that is morally wrong. The two groups in the chapter that
The book” Freakonomics” is by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner. The title, “Freakonomics”, is a combination of two words: Freak (which means quirky, unusual, or weird) and economics, but in the sense of economic related to economic activity; the economics that consumer, families and businesses encounter every day. The title reflects the author’s name of the method of economic analysis in aspects of everyday life that normally fall outside the scope of the work of economists. The author’s success
Name Course Instructor’s Name Date Reading Analysis of “Where have All the Criminals Gone” Executive summary This essay gives a summary of chapter 4 of Stephen Leavitt and Steve Dubner’s “Freakonomics.” Chapter 4 of the book reads, “Where have All the Criminals Gone.” The summary utilizes “Steps for Better Thinking” model constructed by Wolcott. This model helps the reader in breaking down complex pieces of literature into simpler bits to facilitate the process of critical thinking. This essay
photo on the cover is actually a good visual of the books content, it looks like apple on the outside but is an orange on the inside, signifying there is a hidden side of everything, just as the book subtitle reads. Authors Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner take on the economics of the day to day situations as their topic for this bestselling book. Steve Levitt in the explanatory note in the beginning of the book is necessary to read to have a better understanding to the author’s purpose for writing
Freakonomics is a non-fiction book that talks about how everything has a hidden side to it. Steven D. Levitt and Stephan J. Dubner are both economist and authors’ of the book. Published in 2005 the book was made into a controversy due to its view points and was even a New York Times Bestseller. I first thought that the authors’ purpose was to inform the public about how we have to analyze things more closely in order to find the truth. However upon reading the epilogue, in the end, the authors reveal
truthful (Levitt & Dubner, 2009). The piece then talks about trying to identify the situations where the conventional wisdom is false and usually triumphs. The piece provides some different examples that are usually taken at face value, like statistics concerning homelessness and the possibility of being victim of rape or attempted rape. The writers move on to talking about the police departments that painted a picture of crack dealers who had weapons and large sums of cash (Levitt & Dubner, 2009). That
Dear Mr. Levitt, “Nothing is more potent than information, especially when its power is abused.” (page XVII) Freakonomics as a whole has portrayed the conception that people use information as incentives to do one of two things—right or wrong. Chapters such as one, two, and three describe how incentives push people to make lamentable choices, and in contrast chapters four, five, and six expound incentives in a more positive matter. In chapter two, it verbalizes “Experts of every kind are in the
Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything, co-authors Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner shows that the tools of economic research can be put to use in the study of almost anything. Levitt explains, “ since the science of economics is primarily a set of tools, as opposed to a subject matter, then no subject, however offbeat, need be beyond its reach.” (Levitt & Dubner 14) In Freakonomics, Levitt and co-author, Stephen Dubner, show how “Freakonomics” can be applied to some of the most interesting research
Pudd’nhead/Freak Essay In Freakonomics, journalist Stephen Dubner and economist Steven Levitt explore how incentives extend beyond the confines of economics. Incentives, they claim, appear in three forms -- moral, social, and economic -- which profoundly impact one’s actions. These incentives often exhibit a complementary or competitive nature between each other; however, they can also act individually upon one’s actions. In other words, an action could be morally incorrect but socially and