Internalism and externalism Essays

  • Internalism vs Externalism

    1651 Words  | 4 Pages

    Internalism vs. Externalism Knowledge can be achieved either through the justification of a true belief or for the substantive externalist, through a “natural or law like connection between the truth of what is believed and the person’s belief” (P.135). Suppose a man named George was implanted with a chip at birth, which causes him to utter the time in a rare Russian dialect. His girlfriend Irina, who happens to speak the same Russian dialect, realizes that every time she taps his shoulder, he tells

  • Why Is Externalism Justified

    2301 Words  | 5 Pages

    is whether justification is something internal or external? I believe one should be externalist about justification. What is Internalism? Internalists argue that someone is justified about something if the thinker can recognize things from the inside. Only things that one has “first-person access” are relevant to see if a belief is reasonable or not.“Internalism treats justification as a purely internal matter: If p is justified for S, then S must be aware (or at least be immediately capable

  • Alan Soble’s article “Sexual Use and What to do about It

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    engage in sexual acts for procreation. Kant’s own solution to the sexual problem is that sexual activity is permissible only in the context of heterosexual, monogamous lifelong marriage. In this case, Kant’s solution to the problem is a thick externalism that is minimalist. Howard Williams made a shrewd observation on Kant’s solution that the most significant of Kant’s argument involves treating oneself and their partners as objects. Therefore, this clearly, demonstrate that marriage is the only

  • Sexual Use and What to Do about It

    773 Words  | 2 Pages

    activity is viewed as harmful to both the person doing the objectifying and the person being objectified. Soble outlines “Kant’s sex problem” and Kant’s solution, Soble also gives his own solutions, and in learning both I feel the solution is in externalism. Immanuel Kant defines his second formulation of the Categorical Imperative as knowing the value of a person. It is demeaning to use a person without his or her consent for self-gratification, especially sexually. Kant describes this as using a

  • Michael Smith Externalist

    3160 Words  | 7 Pages

    concern for him. This is incompatible with our ideas of human psychology and morality, and so the externalist has failed to explain the striking fact. Internalism, however, did not struggle to find an explanation. This is, basically, Smith’s argument in favour of weak internalism. In his 1996 work, ‘An objection to Smith’s argument for internalism’, Miller raised a serious, but not damning, objection to the ‘striking fact’ argument. He begins by praising Smith’s objection to the externalist explanation

  • William Payne Alston Research Paper

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    He was famous for his glorious views over Internalism Versus Externalism, Foundationalism, epistemic values, speech acts and various other subjects. He was one of the analytic philosophers of America and he did a great job in various philosophies along with many other philosophers. He played a great role in

  • Critical Analysis Of Goldman's What Is Justified Belief?

    1241 Words  | 3 Pages

    This essay attempts to capitalize on Goldman 's “What is justified belief?” to form an opinion about his ideas. Goldman makes a break from traditional views of knowledge to form a theory of externalism. He gives the reader a new point of view for observing the relationship between knowledge and justification. The following passage will weed out some important aspects of his theory and how they relate to his theory as a whole. In the beginning of his paper Goldman makes it clear that he would be

  • Robert Nozick's Tracking Theory of Knowledge in Philosophical Explanations

    630 Words  | 2 Pages

    theory and externalism states that ... ... middle of paper ... ...e theory already allows for knowledge. This does not follow as we are not justified in holding step one without a proper method. Step one is needed to justify three and four, you are not justified in holding either three or four as they both require that we have a justified step one. Thus the steps do not allow for complete justification. When adding the premise Nozick’s theory must become an internalist theory. Internalism holds that

  • How can acousmatic music communicate its intention to the listener?

    2012 Words  | 5 Pages

    Acousmatic music can be challenging to communicate its intention to the listener. Unlike traditional music their is 'no score, no system and no pre-segmented discrete units like notes' (Anderson, 2007; p. 2). Acousmatic music uses what is heard without seeing or knowing the physical origin of the sound as a compositional tool (Contré, WWW). 'It is a type of electroacoustic music, which exists in a recorded format, transmitted and perceived, during performances, via the loudspeaker' (Anderson, p.

  • Is it Irrational to Act Immorally?

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    reasons falls within the category of reasons internalism, which states that motivational reasons, which explain why an agent carried out a particular act, and normative reasons, which count in favour or against it, are inextricably linked. If an agent has a normative reason for an action, this may tell us something about the agent’s psychology. That is, if an agent has a reason to act then he also has motivation to do so. This is in contrast to reasons externalism, which states that a normative reason exists

  • Michael Frayn's Copenhagen

    2077 Words  | 5 Pages

    Michael Frayn's Copenhagen “Our children and our children’s children. Preserved, just possibly, by that one short moment in Copenhagen. By some event that will never quite be located or defined. By that final core of uncertainty at the heart of things.” (Frayn 94) The final line of Michael Frayn's Copenhagen suggests an approach to reading the entire work that looks at the inseparable scientific and dramatic elements of the play. Heisenberg says that no one will ever fully understand the