Ethics in Healthcare Research From Bench to Bedside Animal testing or vivisection can be traced back to the time of the Greek philosophers. Since the twentieth century, the practice has extensively been utilized in research involving therapeutic, hygiene, and cosmetic products, regardless of the ethical concerns that have been raised against the use of animal subjects in biomedical research (Shamoo and Resnik, 2003). In Biomedical research, animal testing is followed by clinical trials that involve
There are many valid reasons why we should continue testing on animals. The life of a human is ultimately more valuable than that of an animal. Without animal research, there would not be the medication as we know it today. Animal testing has enabled science to progress and find treatments for viruses, produce antibiotics for some of the deadly disease, infections as well as preventatives in a form of developing vaccines to cure diseases. Moreover, the factor of moral obligations entreat the facts
For thousands of years, animals have been used to test procedure, vaccines, and medicine to see their reaction prior to using them on humans. This allows these medicines, vaccines, and procedures to be reviewed and accepted by government before making them available to the public. Many medicines have potentially harmful side effects and testing on animals allows scientists to identify these side effects and let the consumer know prior to receiving and taking the medication. During this testing process
Animal research has been around for several years. It is what helped discover so many cures for illnesses and saved over thousands of human lives. But is animal research ever justifiable? Several people believe that animal testing is cruel and shameful, but then there are those who believe it is necessary to humans well being. Animal testing is when procedures are performed on living animals for research purposes on biology and diseases that affect human beings. The point of animal testing is to
When that number stands for the amount of animal lives being lost due to the effects of animal testing in the United States per year, alternatives need to be taken into consideration (“Animal”). Although this testing has provided medical breakthroughs in the past, alternatives can replace the animal today because of the rapid increase in technology. Alternatives such as tissue samples and computer models could easily replace the animal (“Update”). Animal testing and experimentation should be banned
Hour: 3 Animal Experimentation Pros and Cons By: Yousef Medhat The first pro to animal testing is that it has helped us create lifesaving cures and treatments. The California Biomedical Research Association released a statement saying almost every single medical breakthrough has resulted in the direct use of animals in the last 100 years. Can you believe this? Taking out dogs pancreases helped us discover insulin, chimpanzees helped us get a vaccine for
Animal Research The idea of animal testing has been a contested moral issue for over centuries. Many people have heard the phrase “ animal testing “ but are perhaps still unaware what exactly is involved. According to Biology-Online Dictionary, “ Animal testing is the use of animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of test drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials.” In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the concept of animal testing
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is the committee that reviews and approves all research that involves human subjects to ensure ethical treatment and preservation of rights (“Humans – Overview,” n.d.). This type of approval is required when working with any human participants
just a dog. Since psychology’s founding, animals has been used as an important way for psychologist to test their hypnosis, and conduct experiments. From Pavlov’s experiments with Dogs and response, to a modern lab studying the brain of sleeping rats, Animals have provided a huge opening in psychological testing. A significant amount of psychological tests would be impossible without the use of animals. Some people claim the psychological research on animals is inhumane citing psychological test involving
Animal Testing Paper Evidence of animal testing can be found in greek writing as early as 500 B.C. Clearly showing that animal testing has been around for a long time, but only recently has it become a topic of real concern. Used for the purpose of developing medical treatments that could one day benefit humankind, determine the toxicity of medications (usually in at least two animal species), and to check the safety of products that are destined for human use. http://animal-testing.procon.org/ Animal
Frankstein style animal research facility? The unknown about animal research can allow our minds to go wild with ideas. With a better understanding of what medical animal research is, how it is governed, the medical advancements we have experienced and what is being done to eliminate it; I hope we can all start to respect and tolerate medical animal research. Medical animal research is when animals are used to test medical research that is necessary to human or animal health. Some animals that are used
discovery of insulin? Thanks to animal research we don’t have to live without vaccines or insulin. Animal research is a topic debated everyday around the world. Some argue it is cruel to put animals through experiments that animals have no voice in what is being done to them. Others argue that animal testing is good because it collects a lot of information and helps with surgical techniques. I believe that without animal testing we would never know what we know now. Animal testing for medical research
human use? It is a long process including chemical synthesis, animal testing, clinical trials and post surveillance study of the drug. From those all steps, animal testing is a very crucial part and also a debatable step for research. Animals are used to check drug profile, in which animals are suffering from pain, stress and various other diseases. Do you think that animal testing is required? Let’s start with the human perspectives about conducting experiments on the humans instead of animals. When
not be possible. First and foremost, the use of non-human primates does not span all areas of research. The primary use of non-human primates is for complex diseases and testing of pharmaceutical drugs. Non-human primates comprise only 0.30% of all animals being used in research and all institutions using non-human primates have at least one committee if not more than one overseeing the use of these animals. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) is the most prominent and is present
U.S Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (AWA) (Public law 89-544) brought the welfare of stolen animals used for laboratory experiments to the forefront. It authorized the Secretary of Agriculture to regulate the transport, sale, and handling of dogs, cats, non-human primates, and other small animals such as rabbits, hamsters, and guinea pigs held by animal dealers and laboratories for research purposes. It also required dog and cat dealers to be licensed and provide identifications for their animals; however
to what animal testing is and where it is being done, I will explain why animal testing is wrong and the negatives that come from it. Humans are animals, so it may seem like non-human animals are perfect for finding out answers that we may not know about medications, chemicals, and products. But what people do not understand is that these animals are suffering. Animals and humans are morally equal therefore animals should be awarded the same respect as humans (Liou, July 6, 2010). As animal rights
I herewith submit my application for consideration of term tenure appointment. I am currently a Professor in the Department of Cellular and Molecular biology. The late Dr. Allen Cohen, Executive Director of Research, UT Health Center at Tyler, first recruited me as an Assistant Professor of Molecular Biology in August 1990 to work on lung surfactant protein gene regulation. I was promoted to Associate and Full Professor ranks in 1995 and 2004, respectively. Briefly, I obtained my Ph. D. in Biochemistry
Animal experimentation is the use of non-human animals to test products (some research about animals involves only natural behaviors or pure observation). Animal Experimentation is essential for the wellbeing of humans, and can also be beneficial for animals, not just humans. It is also more humane for the animals now then what it was in the past. Although there are some cons to animal testing, there are plenty of pros. Animal experimentation is necessary for the lives of humans. There is no successful
Medical Testing On Animals Medical testing on animals is a very controversial topic that touches almost every individual's life whether they realize it or not. 16 million diabetic people enjoy life they would otherwise not have if it weren't for the dogs, rabbits, and, fish that endured tests to help scientists discover treatments and produce insulin. Cardiovascular disease is high on the list of American killers. The procedures used to treat this affliction such as surgical techniques
For centuries mankind has experimented on animals for a number of different reasons. Early experimentation with animals was originally born out of curiosity but eventually became a necessity to find medicines to cure viruses and a myriad of illnesses. If not for the existence of animals, humans would be left to experiment on themselves at a high rate which would create a worldwide moral dilemma. Such a dilemma could be dictated based on the question of who should be chosen for experimentation;