connection that the Arian debate occurred. The debate itself started in Alexandria, when Licinius was all the while managing in the East, and Constantine in the West. The diocesan of Alexandria, Alexander, couldn't help contradicting presumption of Arius, who was the most prestigious and prevalent presbyter of the city. The principle issue at stake was if the Logos, the Word... ... middle of paper ... ...r Word-Logos-was an animal, or a being less awesome than the Father. The magic word , however
Analysis and History of Arianism First among the doctrinal disputes which troubled Christians after Constantine had recognized the Church in A.D. 313, and the parent of many more during some three centuries, Arianism occupies a large place in ecclesiastical history. It is not a modern form of unbelief, and therefore will appear strange in modern eyes. But we shall better grasp its meaning if we term it an Eastern attempt to rationalize the creed by stripping it of mystery so far as the relation
In all human history, there are rare occasions of great individuals who not only have profound effect on future generations, but who also stand the test of time and scrutiny for millennia. These people are often thought to be great leaders of society or business but when we go back even farther in time, the great thinkers and societal leaders and influencers were more often also some of the great religious influences of their day. Religious influences like Origen of Alexandria and Tertullian, even
Name – Arius felis Name – Hardhead catfish Description – Hardhead catfish have six rounded barbels that stick out from their chins like whiskers. These barbels help the catfish find crabs, fish and shrimp in the muddy bays where they live. The dorsal and pectoral fins each are supported by a sharp, slime-covered barbed spine. The catfish is covered in a mildly toxic slime, that causes severe pain, and swelling, should the catfish cut you. The dorsal spine normally is held erect when the fish is excited
Arian Controversy and Arius’ heretical claims of Jesus’ created nature were necessary and catalytic elements of early Christianity that consequently resulted in the ability of the Church to reformulate and restructure its orthodoxy in a manner that ultimately strengthened the basis of Christianity for centuries to
Controversy questioned the divinity of Jesus and placed the unity of the Church at risk. The Controversy was sponsored by Arius a presbyter presiding under the guidance of Alexander the Bishop of Alexandria. Arius believed in the divinity of Jesus but He did not believe Jesus was eternal. In other words, Arius believed Jesus was lower than God was. On the other hand, Arius and Alexander disagreed and they argued whether the Logos, the Word of God, was co-eternal with God. In response to the controversy
As we all seem to wonder about how, when and why Arianism arose, you must first be able to understand the man who created such a branch of Christianity. His name was Arius and he was a churchman and noble scholar who was the founder of Arianism. It is believed that he came from Libya and it is estimated that he was born in 256. He also liked to refer to himself as a student of Lucian of Antioch. This aged man contended that Christ the Son, although the highest of all creatures, was still a creature
Ben-Hur was transformed from bible scripture to a movie because it is the most read scripture in the Bible. The scripture tells the story of a man, Judah Ben-Hur, who trades his life as the prince of Jerusalem with the life of a slave. The story tells of his journeys and triumphs as a slave. The story starts with the five wise men as their journey to find Jesus. When they arrive in Bethlehem they come bearing gifts for the newborn king. After the birth of Jesus the movie changes to two
This essay will examine the effect of the early Christian heresies, Gnosticism and Arianism, on the construction of the orthodox Christian position on the nature of Jesus. Firstly, it will discuss the merits of each heresy, why they were popular in their respective time periods, and their weaknesses. Secondly, it will examine the similarities and differences between each heresy and the orthodox position. Lastly, it will evaluate how each heresy contributed to the development of the orthodox Christian
by relating them to the issues that arose with in the early church and how they came to solve them. In the second chapter, the author talks about the Arian controversy and the question on who Jesus really was. Hall talks about the points of Arius and how Arius believed that Jesus was a created being. He also discusses the arguments of Athanasius who thought that Jesus was the son of God and was not created but instead coexistent. In the third chapter, the author discusses the debate on the Trinity
providing the basis for Christian cults in America. This paper will outline the fundamental doctrines of Arianism while demonstrating that the theological underpinnings are antithetical to Scriptural teachings and orthodox Christianity. Background Arius took exception to proclamations of Jesus’ divinity and equivalence with the Father
the study of His nature and work. It has been questioned whether the Son is the Savior and whether the Son in God. For centuries there were councils that attempted to answer those questions and came up with their own explanations. Around 300 CE, Arius, a priest from Libya decided to share his view of the nature of Christ with other contemporaries. He announced, "If the Father begat the Son, then he who was begotten had a beginning in existence, and from this it follows there was a time when the
deposed and excommunicated and the one- nature doctrine rejected. Arianism and Apollinarianism fall under the controversy surrounding the Christ being fully divine and fully human. Arianism is the teaching of the Alexandrian presbyter Arius, and his supporters. Arius denied the full divinity of Christ. He taught that the Son of God was not of the same substance as the father and that he was created “... ... middle of paper ... ...Bible Institute Colportage Ass'n., 1934. Gore, Charles. The Incarnation
calling Jesus ‘the Son’ human constraints are placed on the relationship within the Trinity; our understanding can only fathom this relationship as Jesus coming from the Father, rather than him being the Father incarnate. It is with homoousios that Arius finds an issue; he sees Jesus as “secondary, inferior, creaturely” , so while He surely is appointed by God for a divine purpose, ‘homoousios’ must be rejected as “the Father is ‘different in being’ from the Son.” Believing otherwise, that the Trinity
“Christian theology begins, continues and ends with the inexhaustible mystery of God (Migliore, 2014 p. 66).” As said by McGrath (2011, pg. 234), “the Doctrine of the Trinity is one of the most difficult aspects of Christian Theology” to understand. It is a common experience in modern church life to hear God referred to as God, one in nature, comprised of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit (Anatolios, Khaled, 2011). For many modern Christian’s, despite being deeply written into Jesus’ commands
When Alexander, the Bishop of Alexandria began teaching more oneness of the Father and Son, Arius accused him of Sabellianism — thus, began the Arian controversy. Although Arius thought that he was defending the doctrine of the Trinity as it existed then, Alexander and others disagreed. Arius had stripped the Trinity of its Platonic metaphysics. The Arian controversy peaked with the Council of Nicaea, which issued the Nicene Creed. Among other
An event that drastically impacted the history of the Catholic Church was the Council of Nicea. The key beliefs of the Catholic Church were initially defined in the first ecumenical council of the Church, which was held in the city of Nicaea, in modern Turkey, between May and August AD 325. Recognised for being the introductory attempt to attain consensus in the church through an assembly representing all of Christendom, this agreement was a convened in Bithynia, ancient Nicaea; it was convoked by
was during this council that the issues of Christ’s divinity and His relationship to the Father was settled. Arius (260-336) was an ordained presbyter from Peter’s line of succession who apposed the church’s christological position. Arius argued that Jesus was not fully God, thus making him ontologically inferior to God the Father. Alexander, then the senior Bishop of Alexandria apposed Arius’ error thus convening
Jehovah’s Witnesses claim that Jesus was God’s first creation, with inferior quality than God himself or describing Him as an angel, the logic from above leads to the conclusion that there is no salvation in Jehovah’s Witness Theology. Thus the claim Arius made with Nicaea Council was rejected and the claim Jehovah’s Witnesses makes must be rejected too and criticized. Finally more interesting parts.
the Apostle Paul, it is said of Athanasius that he was not great in speaking, he didn't have a great deal of elegance, nor was he astute in political perspicacity. Although he was not a great orator, he was looked at as the chief enemy to his rival Arius. During the Council of Nicaea in 325, Athanasius was the secretary for Alexander of Alexandria. Three years following the Council, Alexander was sick and it would be the year 328 when he would die. It is said that, shortly before he died, Alexander