To what extent does personality predicts employee performance? Introduction The spirit of trait approaches in organization performance is an idea that employees own stable personality characteristic that meaningfully influence their attitudes towards, and social reactions to, organizational backgrounds. People with specific traits tent to be moderately consistent in their attitudes and conduct over time and across condition. Managers seem to inherit a strong trust in the authority of personality traits to forecast behavior at the work area. If managers thought that situations resolute behavior, they would hire individuals almost at random and assemble the situation correctly. But the employee selection procedure in most establishments places a great deal of importance on how applicants achieve in interviews and on examine through which the personality of a person can be achieved and the task distribution can be much easy varying upon the type of personality (Robbins, Odendaal and Roodt, 2001) Cognitively, these behaviors may influence how individuals understand the characteristics of their jobs, as is the situation when individuals with optimistic core self-evaluation understand intrinsic job features more completely, even controlling for real job complexity. Affectively, these personalities might stimulate job satisfaction through their outcome on mood or mood at the organization. Lastly, employees who are emotionally steady, extroverted and conscientious may be better-off at work because they are more possible to achieve sustaining results at work. Part of this outcome may operate through job presentation, such that conscientious employees achieve better and are more content with their jobs because of the intrinsic ... ... middle of paper ... ... 2nd edition. US: Psychology Press Krausert, A (2008). “Performance Management for Different Employee Groups”. Germany: Physica-Verlag. 178. McQuerrey, L. (2014). "How Personality Affect Workplace". Available: http://everydaylife.globalpost.com/personality-affect-behavior-workplace-7367.html. Last accessed 19th February 2014. Mishra, M. (2009). “Organizational Behavior”. 2nd ed. India: Vikas Publisher. 90-114. Murnoe, S. (2014). "How Personality Affect Work Behavior". Available: http://smallbusiness.chron.com/personality-affects-wor-behavior-45940-html. Last accessed 18th February, 2014. Robbins, S., Odendaal, A. and Roodt, A. (2007). “Organizational Behaviour: Global and Sothern African Prospect”. 7th edition. South Africa: Pearson Education. Schinder, B and Smith, B. (2004). “Personality and Organisation”. US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
One of the big facets of Holland’s theory is that individuals who’s personality patterns and work environment are congruent will have a better career outlook and success. As well, individuals who’s work and personality types that are different may not have such a harmonious career experience. Additionally, individuals who’s personality patterns, their multiple personality factors, that are similar will have consistency and may be easier searc...
In this paper the different dimensions of personality will be studied to see if they directly correlate with a leader 's decision-making skills, company’s overall strategies and the success of companies. Specifically, the personalities of two CEO 's of big corporations will be reviewed to demonstrate whether this is true or not.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132-153.
Semaj, L. (1995). The jobbank descriptive guide for the five factor personality profile . Retrieved
The goal of the personality assessments was to provide a better understanding of all of the individuals. Prior research indicated that certain personality types are best matched with certain tasks. However, it is challenging to meet both the technical and personal criteria to create the “perfect” employee. Therefore, it was determined that the knowledge of the individual’s personality style and that of their team members provided a more realistic solution toward communicating effectively and working together as a team. Further instruction is planned for the group to discuss how individuals need to communicate based on their own results and the r...
To prepare for this paper, I took personality and academic tests. I listened to lectures, and researched papers. The purpose of this paper is to get to know myself and familiarize myself with the jobs that suit me. “There are no good or bad personalities. There are positive and negative traits of each personality. Positive traits carried to the extreme become negative traits.” (McConnell)
To gloss over how individual people, influence organizational behavior would lead to a shallow understanding of how organizations work and behave (Fischer, 2006). This is another thing that I learned and that is how I motivate a person will determine the behavior of the people in my organization. To do these things effectively requires good work relations, teamwork, and employees who are motivated and cooperative (Kroeger, Thuesen, & Rutledge, 2002, p. 7). People have to be able to work together and motivate each other to complete the task that is given. We have hopefully made the case to you that you cannot fully understand organizational behavior until you understand the behaviors of individuals, and that to understand individual behavior you need to understand the role that personality traits play in individual behavior (Fischer, 2006). On a personal level I learned that I can grow in regards to in my listen skills (Pearson Education, 2015). As an ENFP, I am as to do well in executive roles. At their best they bring refreshing alternative style to top management and decision making (Kroeger, Thuesen, & Rutledge, 2002, p. 364). In particular, I have learned that the test will better help me be better employee or manger because I know what I need to work on to make myself better in leadership and
There are many people in this world; no two people are the same. When considering personality theories it is important to note that not all theories apply to all situations or all people. Different theories have different approaches. It is important to know the person before making assumptions about the proper theory to apply to the person or in any given situation. The purpose of this paper is to analysis how different personality theorists could interoperate different individual circumstances and behaviors based on case examples provided by the instructor.
Allport defines personality as ‘the dynamic organisation within the individual of those psychological systems that determine his unique adjustment to his environment’ (Allport, 1937). An individual’s unique personality traits and attributes are a powerful indicator of how he/she will interact with the work environment. The difference between average and outstanding employees can often be solely personality related. As the employee is the most valuable asset to the company, ‘selecting the right employee during the process is critical’ (Carbery and Cross, 2013, pp. 41-53)
The Myers-Briggs Personality Test is frequently used in the workplace as a growth tool for not only the employers, but also for the employees. Understanding ones individual personality type is essential to being a productive part of the workplace. In this paper I will discuss how the Type and Temperament my own personality is identified by allows me to be thoughtful and aware as I contribute to the success of my current work team. Each of the four letters carries a strength and weakness that is best understand when the parts are looked at as a whole, I will address all of those items throughout this paper. Needs work
Risavy, S., & Hausdorf, P. (2011). Personality Testing in Personnel Selection: Adverse Impact and Differential Hiring Rates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(1), 18-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00531.x
Discussed below are different researchers’ arguments and explanations on how personality predicts employee performance. This essay will explore both negative and positive ways in which personality can predict the performance, as well as explaining what personality is. Past research has “demonstrated that personality constructs are associated with work performance, with some traits like conscientiousness predicting success around jobs. Other linked with specific occupations e.g. extraversion correlates with success in sales and management as well as training performance supporting”, (Barrick et al., 2002, 87: p.43).
Personality traits can be manifested as strengths or weaknesses depending on the situation, and personality tests can help individuals maximize strengths and minimize weaknesses within the organizational structure. Organizational behavior is critical to organizational effectiveness, and these tests can also point individuals toward certain careers or organizations that are good fits. Pearson Education’s MyManagementLab (2016) contains a series of personality tests and the following discussion analyzes the results of these tests as they apply to my personality and my career. The writing contains illustrations of my personality traits in action. The text also highlights areas of improvement that will enable me to be a better employee, co-worker,
One of the most prominent trends in organization today is the use of team to accomplish the work, which have assigned to an individual. Every team is made up of specific individuals and they are specialized in certain area of interest. If one of the specifications is missing It can be reflected on their performance. It indicates that, every individual is important for the organization. An individual’s performance within an organization and its relationship with its subordinates and coworkers is highly influenced by the Big Five personality traits. My Big five test results depicted that I am traditional/conventional individual with significantly high percentile of conscientiousness and agreeableness. I also have lower neuroticism and slightly
The purpose of this project is to show how personality plays a key role in organizational behavior and how it affects many aspects of the workplace. The goal is to further explore and understand personalities that include strengths, weaknesses, leadership skills and behavior within an organization. The results were gathered using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), a psychological assessment apparatus based on the Jungian personality type theory. The test, was assessed based on how well it validated relationships and anticipated outcomes based on that theory. Through the showing, that personality type does affect organizational behavior and has a biblical connection of covenantal theology. The findings of this project highlighted the importance of a personality type and its effects on behavior and performance in the workplace.