Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Different types of charismatic leaders
Merits and demerits of charismatic leadership
Transformational Leader Behaviors
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Different types of charismatic leaders
McLaurin & Al Amri (2008) de 1bgrscribe a charismatic leader as someone who is self-confident, has a clear vision, takes risks, and acts as an agent of change. Well known charismatic leaders include Mother Theresa, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Malcolm X. The argument could be made that they were transformational leaders, as the dividing line between the two styles seems blurred. Charismatic leaders emerge when there is great turmoil and emotional pain. The people need a leader and are willing to follow someone who is inspirational.
The Charismatic Leader at Foothills WTP
I work at Foothills Water Treatment Plant, which is part of Denver Water. It is the largest treatment plant in the state and over one million people each day rely on our water. It is a high stress, high responsibility job in the best of times.
Our manager is difficult to work with. He is retired from the military and has a very authoritarian-compliance style. Denver Water as a whole is working toward empowering employees and allowing them more freedom in their jobs. He will try to comply with the wishes and allow us more autonomy. But as soon as someone makes a mistake, he gives them a formal, written reprimand, there may be disciplinary action, and he restricts everyone’s actions. Employees are afraid to make a decision or take action without his explicit approval, even when he says we should be acting independently. Morale is low and fear is the overriding motivator for most people.
A charismatic leader could easily turn things around. If we had a leader who inspired us to be the best we can personally and to be the best water treatment plant in the state, people would follow him or her readily and step up to the challenges presented. Fea...
... middle of paper ...
... could make the difference between a satisfactory and an outstanding outcome.
Conclusion
There are many leadership styles available for use. The best type of leadership depends upon the situation and all of the people involved. No one is able to use every style with equal proficiency. But if you know the options, you can choose a style that will suit both you and the situation.
References
McLaurin, J. & Al Amri, M. (2008). Developing an understanding of charismatic and transformational leadership. Allied Academies International Conference: Proceedings of the Academy of Organizational Culture, Communication, and Conflict (AOCCC), 13(2), 15-19.
Northouse, P. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Quiros, E. (2013). Creating an environment for your team to strive. Strategic Finance, 95(10), 20-22.
Transformational leadership theory emphasizes on how a leader can acquire the ability to affect and motivate his followers to succeed beyond expectations. A transformational leader is one, whose vision for the future motivates and excites his followers. For this reason, a transformational leader is judged according to what he achieves as opposed to his character. Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter was the least charismatic leader of all the American presidents. However, his use of transformational leadership to develop his agenda and vision was unprecedented. Furthermore, a transformational leader is more likely to be effective in a chaotic environment. Carter was faced with a stagnant economy, double-digit inflation, and oil and gas shortages.
Before you can summarize the concepts related to leadership theory, you have to define what leadership is. Leadership is a process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task or goals. The fundamental concept of leadership is indirection. In any organization, the leader indirectly impacts the performance of the organization through the performance of individual team members. To make that impact, the leader takes on the role of the coach, and the inspiratory. As the coach, the leader improves the performer's skills. As the inspiratory, the leader inspires the passion required for optimal performance. A good leader can make decisions with a clear mind and will listen to theirs but can run through every consequence and possibility in their head. They take every angle and come out with the best answer for the majority of the people or situations it effects. And will not let their emotions be shut off but will have feeling where it is needed.
Our world is filled with many successful leaders. The gift of being a leader can be learned; however some individuals have a natural born talent to be a leader. Each leader has his or her own unique leadership style. The gift of being a leader can be learned. Certain individuals are born with a charismatic style and can easily be a leader. A successful leader is one who can inspire and motivate people towards a goal. Martin Luther King Jr. was an individual with a born gift to lead people. The following paper will discuss how Martin Luther King Jr. was able to inspire and motivate people with his effective leadership style.
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285-305.
Leadership styles can be divided, primarily, into the two categories of democratic and authoritarian leadership styles. This study will examine the three democratic styles of transformational, servant, and charismatic leadership. The study will both broaden the knowledge of these forms of leadership and examine their effect on performance, engagement, and job satisfaction. The research will further attempt to properly define each style, identify their goals, and effect on innovation. The styles will ultimately be compared and measured against one another to determine their merits and perils. This review will add to the discourse of democratic leadership styles and serve to establish a framework whereby charismatic, transformational, and
To inspire and influence others, a leader must possess many skills and abilities. As motivational speaker Peter Northouse, states, “a leader should be strong, but not rude; be kind, but not weak; be bold, but not bully; be thoughtful, but not lazy; be humble, but not timid; be proud, but not arrogant” (Northouse, 2013) Moving an entire group of individuals toward a singular goal is a considerable undertaking. Without effective communication skills and a clear vision of what needs to be accomplished, one will feel like they are trying to herd cats rather than leading.
Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.). (2013). Transformational and Charismatic Leadership:: the Road Ahead. Emerald Group Publishing.
Leadership is the glue that binds any business together, identifying and understanding your type of leadership style can ultimately aid you in becoming a better leader in your professional career. A successful business cannot function without leadership therefore this is a crucial aspect of internal employee development for businesses striving to stay relevant in a crowded marketplace. In addition to recognizing your leadership style every leader needs to look to them and identify what type of personality they have. By becoming an informed business leader you will gain trust and respect of your team to guide them into the future and maximizing potential growth. Throughout this paper I will identify my leadership style and also personality type and how it has affected my personal career growth. Identifying these conclusions is extremely important in crafting company culture.
Transformational leaders are for the most part lively, energetic, and enthusiastic (Hawkins, 2011). Not just are these leaders concerned and included all the while; they are likewise centered around helping each individual from the group to succeed too. The components of a transformational leader
There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.
Quirus, E. (2013). Creating an Environment for Your Team to Strive. Strategic Finance, 95(10), 20-22.
According to McLaurin & Al Amri (2008) charismatic leaders can be defined as those who have a high self confidence, a clear vision, engage in unconventional behavior and action as a change agent, and while remaining realistic about environmental constraints. When you hear the names President Bill Clinton, Martin Luther King Jr., Mother Theresa, Adolf Hitler or Larry Ellison; whether or not one can categorize their leadership style, most people are familiar with the effect that these leaders have had on society or business. These leaders have demonstrated qualities that have caused them to be known as “charismatic leaders.”
Dubrin, A. J. (2007). Charismatic and transformational leadership. In Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (5th ed., pp. 83-98). Boston, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
A charismatic leader is one whose followers are drawn to his or her personality and magnetism. They have extraordinary qualities and are described as almost god-like to those that follow them and look up to them. With being a team leader, their whole purpose is to try and allow for their passion and enthusiasm to rub off on their team members by portraying a positive and energetic attitude. Charisma stems from participating in something you truly have a passion for, something that undoubtedly sparks your interest. Charismatic leaders seem to become apparent in troubled times, whether it being within personal relationships or within an organization, simply because an inspiring personality helps to reduce any stress or anxiety amongst its followers. Charismatic leaders strongly appeal to the values and morals of their followers and the psychological ...
Another aspect of leadership includes leadership traits such as being influential and inspirational. There also different contexts of leadership, e.g, leading oneself, leading other individuals, leading groups, leading organizations. Some traits that are often associated with being an effective leader include a measure of intelligence, high energy, self confidence, dominance, and a need for achievement. An effective, charismatic leader must lead by example. That leader must be able to know what is going on, the job or task that is being accomplished, and be able to lead the group into performing the task at hand successfully.