In Greek mythology, Eros is the god of love and beauty. When one falls in love, fate falls into the hands of this saintly figure. Many people fail to notice the presence of Eros, and both Robert Bridges’ poem “ΕΡΩΣ” and Anne Stevenson’s poem “Eros” focus on this forgotten god. Despite the focus of each poem being centered on Eros, Bridges uses literary techniques such as metaphor, elated language, and poem structure to enforce the idea that Eros is a dictator over human emotions, while Stevenson creates the notion that Eros is a slave to humans’ desire for love by using metaphor, poem structure, diction, and dialogue.
The visual images of Eros described in each poem convey a drastically different type of god. Robert Bridges depicts Eros as a perfect, unearthly being using metaphor, elated language, and formation of the poem. Bridges relates Eros to an “idol of the human race” (2), suggesting that he reins above the earthly beings of the planet in a god-like nature. The metaphor he uses to call Eros a “flower of lovely youth” (4) delivers the images of beauty and perfection to the god. Bridges continues using euphoric language by describing Eros with “exuberant flesh so fair” (7) as well as an “unchristen’d smile” (15) which emphasizes the impeccable and supernatural qualities of the deity. Bridges describes Eros “With thy exuberant flesh so fair / that only Pheidias might compare,” (7 -8). Bridges uses Pheidias, the Greek sculptor, to compare Eros to a statue, which is the ultimate form of everlasting flawlessness. The uniform rhyme scheme, as well as the shape of the poem, stanzas similar in length, provides a smooth rhythm that stresses the total flawlessness of Eros.
While Bridges uses metaphor and structure to create a fl...
... middle of paper ...
...16), which provides the idea that Eros has more qualities of a flawed and imperfect being than a god.
Overall, the different depictions of Eros in these two poems prove that there are many misguided conceptions towards the idea of Eros and the relationship between love and humankind. The drastically different poems connect Eros to a tyrant who controls the human heart as well as a slave who submits to the beatings of the human heart. The images portrayed in each poem clearly describe opposite individuals, Bridges shows a heavenly, strong figure, while Stevenson features Eros as an abused and distorted humanly character. Eros’ relationship to humans differs between each piece. Bridges imagines Eros manipulating the emotions of an individual, and Stevenson envisions the scenario where Eros is mistreated by humans who search for his help in the desire for love.
In the poems, “EΡΩΣ” by Robert Bridges and “Eros” by Anne Stevenson both have similar yet distinct concepts of the God of love. “EΡΩΣ” describes the concept of love as being conflicted between humans view of Eros as the god of love and lust; where as Stevenson’s poem describes Eros as being bruised and beat up as a result of this constant misunderstanding by humanity. Thus, both poems are similar with their description of Eros’ constant struggles with human nature.
Similar to other classic literature, Homer’s epic poem The Odyssey exhibits the human struggle against a greater power, which each person must use their intellect, courage, and morals to overcome. These factors, which can be seen by the epithets and rhetorical questions, are posed to Penelope during the book. The poem is an exultation of man over the glory of the Gods because despite man’s limitations his achievements are obtained through the combination of his intelligence, fortitude and skills not supernatural powers.
The Greek god of love, Eros, is seen in varying perspectives. To some, he is a powerful force that takes a leadership role in life. He is mighty and unwavering. To others, he is a servant of the people. One such concept of servitude is portrayed in the poem “Eros,” written by Anne Stevenson. Through the use of rhyme, alliteration, and other literary devices, Stevenson produces the reader with a clear image of a beaten god. Because of this, “Eros” can easily be approached with the formal critical strategy.
With time come change, change in the human experience. That fact applies no differently to literature, specifically reflected through reading ancient prose with a modern lens. A relevant example is the relationship of a father and son in Homer’s Odyssey. Through characterization on the surface, this significant relationship appears quite distinct in contrast to such relationships today. However, these quite humane and sentimental relationships are no different than those experienced today—those of a father and son. Quite frankly, what is true of humans in the ancient world is true to humans today, ability to feel such potent emotion, to experience such a significant relationship yields the human need of affection and connection, as reflected with the relationship of the father and the son.
Robert Bridges and Anne Stevenson both have different versions of Eros, the god of love. While Bridges depicts Eros as an inspirational icon, Stevenson shows Eros as someone who has been bruised and abused, the opposite of a typical depiction of a reverential figure. They talk about love itself through the god Eros using their diction, imagery, and rhyme.
Archilochus wore this persona as well, believed to have gone through an initiation brought on by the muses (Heller “Greek Lyric Overview”). For Archilochus, the function that he was putting forward the muses’s words can serve as a blurred line that helps to separate his work from his own individual poetic agendas. Yet, his individual agency cannot be circumvented. In “To An Ex-Mistress” we see Archilochus’s own qualms come to bare, “such was the lust for sex that, worming in under my heart, quite blinded me and robbed me of my young wits…” (fr. 191W). Reminiscent of Sappho, Archilochus brings in sexuality as a topic of investigation and one can only imagine what social setting Archilochus might have chosen to degrade his ex-lover. Was this piece presented for humor or was this piece a serious analysis of man’s own fragility to his sexual desires? Here, we see how social context can certainly illuminate the impact of the poet’s
On the other hand, the Greek poems envisage the concept of love and passion between two people. In one of the poems of Sappho, the speaker expressed: “Come to me now once again and release me / from grueling anxiety. / All that my heart longs for, / fulfill. And be yourself my ally in love’s battle” (25-28). The speaker in this part of the verse seeks for dependence. Same with the poetic techniques of Aztec poetry, this poem also...
In Sappho's poems, she does not take on a typical point of view of love as she describes the allure and agony through her own experience. This alternative approach to love is shown in Sappho's poems 16 as she makes a connection between her own life and the emotions behind the Trojan war. Also, in 31 she describes a physical pain that opens up her life to the audience through her experience with jealousy. Another link between author and audience is seen in poem 94 as Sappho tells a story of her heartbreak. Then in Sappho's fragments 48 and 51, there are short personal phrases, allowing the readers to fill in the rest with their thoughts. It is with Sappho's first-person perspective that she creates an intimate connection with the audience
Of all the heroic traits such as honor and glory, given to the reader through Homer’s epic poems loyalty seems to be the strongest, as with Patroclus in the Iliad, so it is with Penelope, Telemachus, and Eumaeus in the Odyssey. Through the use of these characters loyalty is demonstrated to Odysseus, the hero if the poem. Their undying loyalty and devotion to the warring hero gives perfect examples of how humans should act to those they claim to be faithful too.
There are many essential emotions that form the building blocks of our lives. These emotions help to shape the people that we are. These feelings are emotional necessities to ultimately keep us happy. No piece of literature these feelings more evident than the Odyssey by Homer. Throughout the course of this book there is one major emotional theme: love.
All in all, Shakespeare’s writing depicts the complexities in situations regarding love; each scene of the play brings forth tension and obstacles for each lover, but the use of personification and metaphor, especially with Theseus’ extended metaphor, shows the theme of love’s difficulty to exemplify the ability to overcome obstacles.
Can a simple emotion such as love be regarded as one of the greatest weapons to create or attain power? It’s a renowned fact that human beings are by nature designed to need, crave, and even require love as part of their survival mechanisms. It comes to no surprise that one of the first accounts of antique poetry maintains love and the craving for it as its main theme; thereby, reinforcing the deep importance that it upholds in the lives of many individuals. Sappho’s “Deathless Aphrodite” clearly epitomizes the suffering and bitterness that arises from an unrequited love. In Sappho’s case, which portrays the case of many, she constantly finds herself in loneliness and despair for though she tries repeatedly, she is only let down recurrently as no one reciprocates the love she gives. It is only the Greek goddess Aphrodite, who holds
Authors use poetry to creatively present attitudes and opinions. “A Man’s Requirements,” by Elizabeth Barrett Browning, and “A Letter to Her Husband, Absent upon Public Employment” are two poems with distinct attitudes about love that contain different literary approaches. In both of the poems, love is addressed from a different perspective, producing the difference in expectation and presentation, but both suggest the women are subservient in the relationships.
Love, in classical Greek literature, is commonly considered as a prominent theme. Love, in present days, always appears in the categories of books, movies or music, etc. Interpreted differently by different people, Love turns into a multi-faceted being.
Love defies the test of time and endures when all things suggest its demise. Against odds, lovers meet, and in line with fate, lovers fall apart. The levels of love, and the numerous reactions to those relationships, help determine if and when the relationship will end. Though factors tear two people apart, the love does not always die. These ideas appear time and again, such as in Boccaccio’s The Decameron (the fourth day, first tale) or Virgil’s The Aeneid. Ideals of love and admiration also appear in Sappho’s poetry. Love ties people together, both literally and figuratively. These three works show that complexities of opinion and circumstance threaten to tear lovers apart, but love may still endure in the most unlikely ways.