Teacher Reflective Models: Gibbs and Rolfe

1140 Words3 Pages

The intention of reflective practice is to help the teacher/learning coach evolve and develop the quality of their teaching by the continuation of personal development. Although most teachers have done this for years, reflective modelling or methods have formulized a structure which can be followed and adapted to best suit their methods. It is an ongoing process which takes feelings and emotions into consideration and so it will not always have a definitive answer/ending. Since most models of reflection require subjective and objective thinking then there is a willingness to be honest to engage constant self appraisal. It asks that the teacher become flexible analytical and socially aware when addressing their chosen model of reflection.

The two reflective models I have chosen to compare are Gibbs and Rolfe.

First I will start by discussing the Gibbs reflective cycle –

In the nursing field the most commonly used cycle is the Gibbs cycle of reflection, it proposes that theory and practice enrich each other in a never-ending circle. The reflective cycle can be defined as a process that enables you to think systematically about the phases of an experience or activity by addressing the following questions in a cycle – DESCRIPTION, FEELING, EVALUATION, ANALYSIS, CONCLUSION and ACTION PLAN.

Positives of the Gibbs model -

I will be addressing these points from my own experience and views as a secondary school teacher.
At first glance the Gibbs cycle of reflection looks familiar and simple. Words like description, evaluation, analysis are all relevant to my teaching field as a Design and Technology teacher.
For 10 years I have used these words as a structured platform to guide my students in their work tasks from ks3 to ks4 and...

... middle of paper ...

...“this is the one for me”, it looked simple, had directness and outcome. By being so minimal or oversimplified it can also be too minimal and it may not always have the ability to allow the individual to be affective enough in their thought process and true feeling. Is it possible to hide truer thoughts and feelings from Rolfe’s method? Has it been targeted to a certain individual or situation where time and not pure rationalization is the key?
Rolfe’s model doesn’t really move beyond questions about whether or not the practice is working to critically examining values and how practices lead to change, commitment to quality and respect for difference.
As I mentioned the last question can make the greatest contribution and therefore may be most important and so this thinking may restrict the individual from asking more prominent questions in relation to themselves.

Open Document