Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brief paragraph of stem cell research
Embryonic and adult stem cells
Brief paragraph of stem cell research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Brief paragraph of stem cell research
President Obama acted appropriately when he signed legislation to reverse the ban restricting use of use of embryonic stem cells for research. The benefits of embryonic stem cell research for the advance of medicine are far greater than moral and ethical concerns raised by many. Using unwanted embryos in the blastocyst stage for research enables scientists to perform valuable studies that could ultimately result in the development of a cure for many ailments that plaque us or our loved ones. Embryonic stem cell research has shown to offer monumental therapeutic potential for repairing damaged organs. In 2001, President Bush signed legislation preventing the use of Federal funds on new stem cell lines of embryonic stem cells. Lines currently in place could still be used. Additionally, the legislation prevented scientist who were studying under federally funded grants from performing experiments using embryonic stem cell. Laboratories supplemented by Federal funds, could not perform research using embryonic stem cells, or use equipment purchased with Federal funds for the research. This legislation was a major setback for the research, but did not completely stop it. Scientists continued to use the stem cell lines in place before the legislative restrictions for their research. In 2009, President Obama reversed the ban prohibiting the use of Federal funds for embryonic stem cell research, lifting the restrictions. The NIH (National Institute of Health) oversees the research, to ensure its integrity. President Obama recognized the sensitivity of this issue, but proceeded to reverse the ban, despite the protest of pro-life and certain religious groups who argue against the use of embryonic stem cells for research on moral and ethi... ... middle of paper ... ... find it very exciting to imagine what treatments may be available to future generations, made possible through stem cell research. I encourage anyone opposed to embryonic stem cell research based on basic information taken from a news report, to do the research. Imagine what a difference finding a cure for many diseases could make in the healthcare crisis our country currently faces. I encourage you to consider this as you go to the polls next year to elect our next President. Works Cited Frequently Asked Questions. “Stem Cell Research”. UMich.edu November 16, 2011 Web. Knowles, Lori P. “The Use of Human Embryos in Stem Cell Research” in Stem Cell Network Stemcellschool.org November 16, 2011 Web Stem Cell Basics. In “Stem Cell Information” Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2009 November 16, 2011 Web.
federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, placed by the President George W. Bush. Obama addresses important factors of why he removed the ban such as keeping innovative scientists in the country and the many future promises the research holds. The president is biased towards the future of using embryonic stem cells in his speech― he strongly supports them and strives to improve research opportunities. However, President Obama does acknowledge the downside effects that this research can bring such
of embryonic stem cell research. The embryonic stem cell debate has polarized the country into those who argue that such research holds promises of ending a great deal of human suffering and others who condemn such research as involving the abortion of a potential human life. If any answer to the ethical debate surrounding this particular aspect of stem cell research exists, it is a hazy one at best. The question facing many scientists and policymakers involved in embryonic stem cell research is
debate about stem cell research since 1998 when the research teams of James A. Thomson of the University of Wisconsin and John D. Gearhart of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine announced the isolation of human stem cells (Farrell). But before anyone should take a side, one must know what a stem cell is. A stem cell is an unspecialized cell characterized by the ability to self-renew by mitosis while in undifferentiated state, and the capacity to give rise to various differentiated cell types by
in modern science have generated as much excitement and public debate as the discovery of human embryonic stem cells (hESC). The debate over the use of embryonic stem cells in research has polarized the global community along the lines of those who argue that such research holds the promise of medical breakthroughs for many currently incurable diseases and ailments, while opponents condemn such research as it involves the destruction of a potential human life and is seen as humanity “playing God”
March 2014 Embryonic stem cells: Immoral or Necessary? Stem cells are becoming a powerful new tool for replacing damaged or destroyed tissue in different parts of the body. There are two basic types, embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells. Stem cells, found in the body, can engender exact facsimiles of themselves. They have the capacity to construct a number of specially designed cells such as heart muscle cells, liver tissue cells, brain tissue cells, etc. Embryonic stem cells are extracted
disfigured or paralyzed. Embryonic stem cell research is a part of biomedical science and has the potential to ease the suffering of sick people by curing diseases and defects, creating organs and tissue for patients needing transplants or skin grafts, regenerating axons in spinal cord injuries, and creating new treatments, drugs, and immunizations. However, America’s government does not support this research to an extent that would make a difference in medicine; only a few stem cell lines are authorized
technology stem cell research intensifies, so does the controversy about whether such scientific progress is moral. In the past millennium to today the present stem cell research has become a controversial topic across the world. Stem cells are unspecialized cells that have unique regenerative abilities, allowing them to divide into specialized cell types. Understanding why these processes occur is essential to curing disease. Critics of stem cell research argue that the extraction of embryonic stem cells
Stem cells research can help the human with cancer, birth defects and help to build normal cells it is only normal that we should research stem cells. Stem cells are special cells that are undifferentiated and have the capability to become many other types of cells. All stem cells have the ability to renew, replicate, and divide; thus, producing new cells. These cells are separated into categories according to their potential to become other types of cells. Two main stem cell types are embryonic
Stem Cell Research: A Hot Button There are people who enjoy the fact that they can use their own bone marrow and stem cells to treat themselves. There are many diseases and injuries that stem cells may be able to cure. Alone there are positive outcomes using stem cells, there stands debate on the use of embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells should be used to sustain life because they can rebuild organs despite the concerns. Now, stem cells might sound like a great thing, but what are they
Embryonic Stem Cell Research Is A Growing Complication Over the past couple years, scientist have continued research on embryonic stem cells, but there is still lots of controversy that accompanies this research. While research has grown to be more successful, it has also become more difficult to face controversies. These controversies mostly consist of funding and issues of differing moralities. There have been projects where funding was pulled because of people’s believing in different moralities
Stem cells offer exciting promise for future therapies, but significant technical hurdles remain that will only be overcome through years of intensive research. Stem Cells have the incredible potential to develop into many different cell types in the body during early life and growth. Scientists primarily work with two kinds of stem cells from animals and humans. The embryonic stem cells and the non-embryonic stem cells. Stem cells are the cells from which all other cells originate. In a human embryo
history of stem cell research, complicated ethical battles wage for those who support embryonic research, and those who oppose it. Since the beginning of embryonic stem cell research, more conservative parties have argued against its morality. The main arguments against using spare IFV embryos are: there’s no use for embryonic stem cell research because adult stem cells already achieved successful results, using an embryo for scientific research constitutes as murder, and “embryonic stem cell research
Panacea Panacea- n. a cure for all ills, a universal remedy [Webster’s 724]. Embryonic stem cell research has been one of the most heavily and intensely debated topics in the past five to ten years. Although it is not literally a cure for all sicknesses, it holds the key to the most exciting medical advances in the last 100 years. The controversy surrounding stem cell research is such a huge deal because of the moral dilemma surrounding it. There is no doubt that everybody would like to have
against Embryonic Stem Cell research mainly because they consider it unethical to use aborted fetuses for research. The two main issues concerning the research are the ethics (Cons) and the benefits (Pros). In any scientific case, ethics must always be considered. But the use of fetuses is something that is of the utmost importance. The costs are generally measured based off of people’s feelings, morals, and knowledge about the subject up for debate. The use of aborted fetuses for stem cell research
Embryonic Stem Cells: Our Moral Duty to Persons In the Bioethics book, the Magisterium of the Church argues against the use of embryonic stem cells and refers to it as “the first ethical problem”. The main argument supporting the claim that its unethical to destroy human embryos goes as follows: (1) It is morally impermissible to intentionally kill innocent human beings; (2) the human embryo is an innocent human being; (3) therefore, it is morally impermissible to intentionally kill the human embryo