How can a country reinforce its position in the world community? What determines national potential of power? What is the "golden ticket" to the elitist club of the most powerful states which set the world's agenda? The exact answer to these questions does not exist, because there are no written rules or instructions "how to get the power and authority worldwide". However, as far back as in XIXth century, everybody could answer the question "how to become a superpower". And the response would be evident: to beat another superpower. In those times the place of the state in the world highly depended on its military force. Last few decades have seen dramatic changes in the structure of international relations and the balance of power. One of the most significant factors underlying these alterations was an intensification of globalisation processes. Growing interconnectedness and interdependence became determinant in policy-making. That factor assured relative world stability: there was no "big" war since World War II. Thus, military power has become a state passive, which, however, does not reduce its importance. At the same time, during XXth century the influence of an economic component of power was rising. Moreover, in the second part of XXth century countries started attaching more significance to their image and reputation. All these components differ by their methods of implementation and the way they influence other countries. That idea was suggested by American political scientist J. Nye who divided the concept of power into two types: "hard" power and "soft" power. According to this classification military and economic elements are included into "hard" power, since they both involve compelling aspect: with "hard" power s... ... middle of paper ... ...culturelle [Book]. - Paris : La Documentation française, 1996. 18. Roche F. La diplomatie culturelle dans les relations bilatérales [Online] // Sens Public. Revue Web. - http://www.sens-public.org/spip.php?article235&lang=fr. 19. Rubinsky Y.I. Speak French [Online] // Russian International Affairs Council. - April 2013. - http://russiancouncil.ru/inner/?id_4=1647#top. 20. Shishkin, D.P., Zhuravleva, N.N. Main Approaches to Determine Cultural Component of the Country Image [Book Section] // Image of the Country/Region: modern approach. New Ideas in Theory and Practice of Communication / авт. книги Gavra D.P.. - Saint-Petersburg : Roza Mira, 2009. 21. Védrine H. La réorganisation du réseau culturel français en Allemagne [Online] // Documents. Revue du Dialoque Franco-Allemagne. - http://www.dokumente-documents.info/uploads/tx_ewsdokumente/doc_dossier_2001_2.pdf.
McQuillan, Aidan. “Des chemins divergents: les Irlandais et les Canadiens francais au XIXe siècle.” ed. Wadell, Eric. “Le dialogue avec les cultures minoritaires.” Ste-Foy, QC: Les Presses De L'Université Laval 1990.
Shiraev, Eric B., and Vladislav M. Zubok. International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Safari the Globe. “France: Culture and Identity.” Safari the Globe. Feb. 2012. Web. 7 Oct. 2013.
In a recent verbal bout with my History of the Military Art professor, I contended that the true might of a nation may be inversely proportional to the size of its military during peacetime. My thinking, though perhaps idealistic, was that the maintenance of a large military during relative international tranquility is an overt admission of weakness and increases the likelihood of unnecessarily employing that force—it is contextually irrelevant. Instead, I proposed that a strong and stable economy is the best metric of national prowess, for such an economy can resource many opportunities as they arise. On the contrary, a robust standing military has a much narrower utility. To be sure, this author is not one that intentionally seeks to take an interdisciplinary approach to academia, but the connection seems relevant given the nature of this assignment. Whereas a nation may accomplish a strategic goal through military force, a leader may accomplish a task relying upon coercive power; whereas a nation may transform and develop the world through its economic strength and versatility, a versatile leader may transform others through the employment of one or many leader development principles—both theoretically based and experientially acquired. This piece serves to describe acquired PL499 course concepts and their relevance to my project team and the West Point Leader Development System (WPLDS). Only through a...
Kent, J. and Young, J.W. (2013), International Relations Since 1945: A global History. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Since the beginning of recorded history Power, something that can't be put together in a single concrete definition, has been powering and accelerating human evolution and the growth of civilizations. To have control over... has been the main concern of all civilizations, since the early Sumerian hegemony all the way to the Powerful United States with a National Power Index of 0.90 by 2011.
While the definition of power is a point of contention among scholars such as Morgenthau and Waltz, there is a general agreeance that power in an international sense is the ability to coerce a decision based on the political, military or economic clout a nation is able to exert onto another. By this definition the Cold War era of human history is one of the most prevalent examples of both economic and political power (referred too as “Hard” power) as well as cultural influence as a form of power (known instead as “soft” power). In the post-World War 2 era the balance of power theory played a major role in the international relations between the two superpowers, being the United States of America and The USSR through constant volleying of
power is the ability to take arms and defend the nation in a time of crisis or invasion of another
Doyle, Michael W. and G. John Ikenberry, eds. (1997) New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Pres.
The basic world situation is thus that there are three superpowers, each drastically different and each searching for its place in a new world order. Other nations do, of course exist, and can be influential figures regarding trade and alliances, but the three superpowers, only two of whom are really interested in expansion and conflict, drive the international scene.
The oxford dictionary has attempted to define power as the “ability to influence people or control the behaviour of people”. Power has been related to different forms such as political economic, military and even psychological. Power has widely been considered to be the classic determinant of conflict between interstates. Realists view power as a source of state preference. Animosity is constantly caused around power relations which in turn determine why states go to war and why politicians emphasize the role of power in conditioning distance. There is a non-linear relationship of power between the plural perspectives of realism. Realists consider states to be the principal actors in international relations as they are deeply concerned with the security of their own nation especially for the pursuit of national interest. However with this perspective there has been some scepticism with regards to the relevancy of morality and ethi...
Now in the 20th century , the way to prove how strong one country is , is to check their military force and their ability of having advanced weapon . When the first battle ever started , swords , shield , bow and arrow was used and if there was a war in the 20th century no one can predict what might happen in the end but something that can be confirmed is a huge amount of people life will be taken away. Now more developed country will usually spend more money and invest into more advanced weapon because by having more advanced weapon the country will have have more power as the stronger the country is the more power it will have globally.
Baylis, Smith and Patricia Owens. 2014. The globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. London. Oxford University Press.
Since the earliest recorded history, there has always been one elusive title that a State has strived for, the title of Super Power. Power is one of the fundamental characteristics of the international system and the distribution of power among states. It is obvious that states are unequal in power and this “entails a number of important implications for international politics”. As a result of this lack of power, the ‘weak states’ desires and concerns are often neglected and the ‘strong states’ demands usually shape the international agenda. In the Modern Society, some would argue that we have two great powers in Russia and the United States, but if you measure and compare the two countries, The United States is more powerful. Some of these categories are population in which the U.S has more than double Russ...
Another important factor promoted globalization is called the ‘World Politics’. Foreign policymakers are facing a challenge of a fundamental change in nowadays ...