Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An Analysis of George Orwell's Anti-Utopian Elements in 1984
Capitalism and socialism comparison
An Analysis of George Orwell's Anti-Utopian Elements in 1984
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Could socialism ever work? This is the question that has at least crossed the minds of hundreds of millions of the people around the globe, especially with credit crunch and recession that unfolded over the past few months. Variety of issues that have revolved around socialism as a concept, theory or an idea is not about its complexity or its difficult interpretation, but the fact that, to most people it sounds too good to be true. Many people having been through demoralizing systems of capitalism, having become convinced that nothing as good as socialism could ever happen in life- just like that without a possible catch somewhere (Colin, 2009, p. 189). Socialism is perfectly reasonable and practical way in which a society’s organization can be based, and the different objections to it are rather mere dominant capitalistic ideologies that are illusory. In this essay, arguments that socialism is in deed possible and can work are presented (Kelly, 2009, p. 3). The efficiency and bureaucracy, the problem of greediness and competition, laziness and efficient work organization to cater for dirty works in a socialist society are analyzed.
Socialism seems less efficient and bureaucratic. One of the typical arguments against socialism is that it is much less efficient and bureaucratic (Caldwell, 2011, p. 87). Analysis of the United States health care system immediately discredits the arguments that private is less bureaucratic than the public. The profit oriented, private health care system in the United States is faced with much bureaucracy that is chiefly aimed at performing of paperwork and the logistics involved ensuring that profits and revenues are channeled to some few individuals (Peter, 2008, p. 335-7). a study carried by Harvar...
... middle of paper ...
...009, ‘A new look at American communism’, Springer and Business Media Journal, vol. 22: 452- 462.
Orwell, G 2008, ‘Socialism and utopia’, Journal of Utopian Studies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp.73-79.
Peter, KV 2008, Towards an era of development. The globalization of socialism and Christian democracy 1945–1965.’ International Review of Social History, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 332-335.
Shils, E & Coleman, P 2009, ‘Remembering the congress of cultural freedom’, Journal of Springer Science, vol. 46, pp. 437-444.
Stephen, Y 2009. ‘Towards Co-operative Politics: Using Early to Generate Late Socialism’, Journal of Co-operative Studies, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 22-35.
Tamas, GM 2009, ‘Socialism, capitalism, and modernity’, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 3, no. 3, pp 60-74.
Wan-lei, W 2009, ‘Studies on the Content of State Socialism in the 1930s’ Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences.
In Socialism Coincides with American Values, Jedediah Purdy produces an interesting insight and argument about the theory of socialism. He believes that socialism can be incredibly beneficial to the United States political and economic systems but are swept aside due to harsh misconceptions of the idealism. He states, “There are essential insights that we lose track of when we let ‘socialism’ be turned into a slur.” Purdy then argues socialism is more American than most Americans want to believe.
2011. The. Lopez, Nate, ed., pp. 113 Communism. The. N. p. n.d. - a.k.a.
Roelofs, H. Mark. "George Orwell's Obscured Utopia." Religion and Literature 19.3 (Summer 1987): 11-33. Rpt. in Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Ed. Kathy D. Darrow. Vol. 276. Detroit: Gale, 2013. Literature Resource Center. Web. 25 Feb. 2014.
Socialism as defined by the parameters of the post revolution into the pre industrial period was the nearly universally marked by the race to empower the working class. Yet, within this broad definition of socialism, Karl Marx, Gracchus Babeuf, and Robert Owen differ in their views of a utopian society and how it should be formed. It was to be their difference in tradition that caused their break from it to manifest in different forms. Although they had their differences in procedure and motive, these three thinkers formed a paradigm shift that would ignite class struggle and set in motion historical revolutions into the present. Within their views of a utopian community, these men grappled with the very virtues of humanity: greed versus optimism.
Chen, Anna. George Orwell a Literary Trotskyist? 2 Oct. 2000. K1 Internet Publishing. 13 Dec. 2000 .
Temkin, G. (1998). Karl Marx and the economics of communism: Anniversary recollections. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 31(4), 303–328. doi:10.1016/S0967-067X(98)00014-2
The Industrial Revolution in Western Europe provided the context for economists and political writers of the 19th century to promote three different economic plans designed to meet the needs of workers and entrepreneurs. State-sponsored socialism was first proposed by Eduard Bernstein as a reform plan for the existing economic system of capitalism. The major tenet of state-sponsored socialism included government-sponsored legislation to regulate business over time. Although there were many advantages including improving the standard of living and national unity; however, there were also disadvantages because socialism didn’t eliminate poverty nor the social evils inherent in a market-based economy. The economic system of socialism was implemented in Germany during the 19th century through legislation. In some ways, socialism was successful because it lowered the number of unemployed people and it provided healthcare for its poorest citizens. In other ways, socialism was unsuccessful because it was not consistent with the fundamental characteristics of human greed. Although it failed to operate under a consistent competitive profit, the economic system of socialism did address the needs of both entrepreneurs and workers because the middle class grew.
Rahv, Philip. "The Unfuture of Utopia." George Orwell. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1986. 102-105.
Klindo, M, 2001, ‘A failure to confront reality’, World Socialist Web Sites. Available from: < http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/may2001/yoln-m17.shtml > [17 May 2001]
Social services are a necessary and crucial building block to maintain a thriving society and government. Health care is a hot topic today, but the fact of the matter is health care should be obtainable to every single individual; no one person should lose their home because they became ill. Democratic socialism utilizes health care for all. Protection from unemployment and security for the elderly is aid given to those who would otherwise go without. It is imperative as a society to leave no one person behind when in need. A welfare state is a humanitarian effort to safeguard and help those who otherwise couldn’t help themselves.
Works Cited for: Orwell, George. 1984. The 'Standard' of the ' London: Penguin Books, 2008. Print. The.
Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. Orwell, George. A. A. 1984. The. New York, NY: Signet Classics, 1977. Print.
World Socialist Movement. Socialist Standard, n.d. -. Web. The Web. The Web. 11 Apr. 2014.
If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens. Market economies, as a whole, inherently and inevitably lead to poverty and a large class disparity. In a capitalist society, the ones who supply labor, the ones who work the hardest, are the ones who are paid the least. The owners, who are already rich, receive most of the profit and accumulate large masses of wealth.
Janos, Andrew C. “What was Communism: A Retrospective in Comparative Analysis.” Communist and Post- Communist Studies Volume 29 (1996): 1-24. Print.