Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between father and son essay
Father and son relationship
Relationship between father and son essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relationship between father and son essay
Many people believe the the offspring of a couple is going to turn out very similar to its parents. The scots may have said it best with a proverb thats probably older than most men living today. “bu dual do dh'isean an ròin a dhol chun na mara” Literally translates into “it is a puppy seal's heritage to go to the sea” however it has a much deeper meaning than that. The proverb simply means “like father like son.” (Significado) Along with the concept of father like son, Mary Shelley was a romantic which was also a likely contributor to the similarities between these two characters. Victor and the monster, creator and created, share many similarities, including their relationships with nature, desires for family, and their overall want to do good.
Victor Frankenstein shows an increasingly noticeable relationship with nature throughout, mary shelley's frankenstein. Which is no surprise because romantics felt nature has a strong connection to everything. Victor was obsessed with the natural world, learning about life and death, and even learning how to reanimate dead objects. He even went to college to study biology, by choice and with enthusiasm. (Chapters 3–5) In the novel victor has many moments when he needs to clear his head and get away from it all, every time he goes somewhere into the wilderness and his life becomes bearable again. (Shelly 22) Almost as if nature had some sort of healing properties for him.
Not only does victor show a noticeable relationship with nature throughout the entire novel but the monster also has a strong connection with nature. He spent several days in the wilderness observing the De Laceys living in the wilderness. (Shelly 86) He was also able to acquire food from the wilderness. The nature also...
... middle of paper ...
...ol Chun Na Mara." Wiktionary. Wikimedia, 23 Aug. 2013. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. .
"Chapters 1–2." SparkNotes. SparkNotes, n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. .
"Chapters 3–5." SparkNotes. SparkNotes, n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. .
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Maurice Hindle. Frankenstein, Or, The Modern Prometheus. London: Penguin, 2003. Print.
Shelly, Mery. "Frankenstein." Classicly.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. .
"Significado De Bu Dual Do Dh'isean an Ròin a Dhol Chun Na Mara." Que-significa.es. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2014. .
Unlike the Romantic who revered and honored nature, Victor wants to use it for his own gain. He expects “happy” and “excellent natures” to obey him, and he doesn’t dwell upon the consequences of his actions. His outlook changes after the creature comes to life. As Victor stares into the watery, lifeless eyes of his creature, he finally realizes his mistake in trying to disrupt the natural order of the world. Scared by the outcome of his actions, Victor attempts to run away and find comfort in nature.
Victor mentions, periodically, that he finds peace in nature (this is a continuation of the idea that nature can heal, mentioned above).
From the onset of Victor’s youth, his earliest memories are those of “Curiosity, earnest research to learn the hidden laws of nature, gladness akin to rapture, as they were unfolded to me, are among the earliest sensations I can remember” (ch. 4) This is the first example of obsession that we see in the novel. This drive to learn the ‘hidden’ laws of nature is the original driving force that sets the plot in motion. Without this, Victor would have never embarked on his unholy quest to overcome mortality, thus leading to his creation of his monster.
While Victor and the monster are divergent physically and socially, they have many identical characteristics. Even as they become increasingly similar, their relationship only exacerbates. They are similar in their desires for knowledge, relationships with nature, and with desires for family. These defining characteristics are what shape these characters, their actions, and ultimately the plot of the novel.
I believe Frankenstein is a villain in this book. I believe he promotes the idea of evil which is symbolised through creating the creature. He is described as “a creature causing havoc”. The creature is an unwanted person. He has no belonging in this world. He was created, and because of this, he is an outcast because of Victor Frankenstein. The creature is the victim. He is lonely and rejected. Frankenstein is the cause of this. I believe it is wrong to play god. No man should try and create human beings. He has created a being that is driven to the extremes of loneliness in life. This is destroying innocent lives.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and the monster that he creates are very similar. For example, Victor creates the monster to be like himself. Another similarity is that the anger of both Victor and the monster is brought about by society. One more parallel between Victor and the monster is that they both became recluses. These traits that Victor and the monster possess show that they are very similar.
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Maurice Hindle. Frankenstein, Or, The Modern Prometheus. London: Penguin, 2003. Print.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. New York: W. W.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Edited by: D.L. Macdonald & Kathleen Scherf. Broadview Editions. 3rd Edition. June 20, 2012
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. The 1818 Text. New York: Oxford UP, 1998.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Edited by: D.L. Macdonald & Kathleen Scherf. Broadview Editions. 3rd Edition. June 20, 2012
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, Walter James Miller, and Harold Bloom. Frankenstein, Or, The Modern Prometheus. New York: New American Library, 2000. Print.
Shelley, Mary. “Frankenstein.” In A Norton Critical Edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 1996.
When deciding who the true monster in Frankenstein is, one can point to the obvious and determine that it is Victor Frankenstein’s morbid creation (who commits murders), but when looking at the situation from both perspectives, the reader can deduce that the real monster is Victor. Despite the aforementioned murders, the creature was Victor’s responsibility, and the brilliant scientist decided to abandon him. This denial of affection greatly impacted Frankenstein’s creation because he had to forgo the trials of being an outcast of society ever since he was brought into the realm of the living. Victor Frankenstein is the true monster in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein because he heartlessly leaves his creation to suffer the strife of human discrimination.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus. Edited with an Introduction and notes by Maurice Hindle. Penguin books, 1992