Love is generally viewed as a deep and tender feeling of affection to a person or persons and their happiness is important to you. In ancient Chinese, Confucius, a famous philosopher in the Spring and Autumn period, introduced the virtue of humanity, while Mozi promoted another virtue, universal love. Universal love is a kind of pragmatic love while humanity is a kind of non-pragmatic love. Universal love advocated love without distinction while humanity is a kind of extensive love with the foundation of filial piety, which means people should love their parents first and later spread the love to others. After analyzing, it is clear that these two concepts are not compatible due to the mutually exclusive foundation. In this essay, the similarities and differences between humanity and universal love will be discussed. This essay will also provide supports that both concepts are not compatible with reference to the Analects, Mozi, Mengzi and Zuo Zhuan.
The first major difference between humanity and universal love is the order of love, in other words, whether love should be with or without distinction. In humanity, love towards different parties are not the same. It emphasizes much on existential love that is love with the foundation of filial piety. One loves people who have closer relationship with him more than people who are less related to him. While universal love promotes universality and people should love others equally. Mencius commented on the source of love and agreed that love makes no distinction, but its application must begin with one’s parents (Chan, 1963). This clear states that although both humanity and universal love are about love, their foundations are different and violates each other. Confucian’s notion is ...
... middle of paper ...
...h humanity and universal love tell people to love each other and it is ever present and we do not need to learn or study about it. However, their foundations and intentions are different and violate each other. Although some people pointed out that humanity may lead to universal love eventually and love without distinction is not totally absent in humanity, they are still not compatible as they cannot be upheld at the same time.
References
Chan, W.-t. (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton University Press.
Mengzi. (371 BC). Gong Sun Chou I.
Mengzi. (371 BC). The Mencius. Shangdong.
Mozi. (468 BC). Will of Heaven I.
Watson, B. (2003). Universal Love Part III. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wong, M. H. (2014, March Week 5). The debate on love with and without distinction.
Zisi. (465 BC). Doctrine of the Mean.
Zuo, Q. m. (389 BC). Zuo Zhuan.
The first chapter begins with an exploration of love and marriage in many ancient and current cultures. Surprisingly many cultures either avoid the discussion of love in marriage or spit on the idea completely. China and other societies believed that love was simply a product of marriage and shouldn’t get too out of hand, while a few Greek and Roman philosophers shunned excessive
Second, we are selfish. As a human we are nature selfish. Some may say no I’m not selfish but deep down every human being have some type selfishness inside. Always want the best for people but once our love once is involved we go all out to make it happen. We value our own people more than other. It can’t change no matter what happen. In the article “The Myth of Universal Love” Stephen T. Asma claims “that the equality of human beings is “unproven.” It’s interesting that he feels no need to show that it is unproven and merely has to assert it, as if asserting it is a sufficiently rigorous argument.” In other words, Asma believe that it is obvious that people favor their family over their friends, their friends over their acquaintances, and acquaintances over strangers.
Throughout the postclassical era, there were many approaches to the idea of love and to the sanctification of love. While some people focused on love as merely a sign of infatuation, others used it as a means of attaining spiritual closeness, and a way of sexual gratification. The countries of Europe, India and Japan proved to be no different. With an emphasis on courtly love, Medieval Europe defined love by romantic gestures and refraining from intercourse, while India defined love in terms of a sexual and spiritual connection and Japan defined love as a means of acting upon desire in an elegant fashion. These vastly different meanings of love were reflected in marriages and gender relations of the era.
Graded love is to have different levels love for different people and forms of life. Mencius adopted this idea from Confucius. Their idea was that love is a limited resource because we are human so it can only be spread so far. Family naturally draws love; it is natural to love one’s parents, to respect one’s elders, and to look up to one’s older siblings. It is also natural to love one’s children. Family is the most important thing according to Confucius, Mencius, and the graded love ideology. Loving family members is natural and family teaches one how to deal with feelings and interpersonal
This passage marks the first of several types of love, and gives us an intuitive
Chinese Philosophy not only is the fruit of thinking of the Chinese nation, but also is the important component part of world culture. In Chinese philosophy, there are three main parts: Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism. Among them, Chinese Buddhism, which came from India, experienced a course of sinicization under the influence of Chinese traditional culture represented mainly by Confucianism and Taoism , so it keeps the general features of Buddhism ,and also formed its Chinese characteristics. The changes of Chinese Buddhism from "going out of this world " to "being in this world " and "building pure land in this world " fully manifested the humanistic spirit of Chinese culture. Both Chinese Buddhism and Western Christianity are religion, but in the realm of thoughts and culture, they are important symbols of Oriental and Western culture. This paper compares the two schools' philosophy of life, so as to explore the modern meaning and value from the mankind's common culture legacy.
Namely, Symposium presents heavenly love as a means of empowerment, which contrasts the The Bhagavad-Gita’s philosophy of love as a barrier from what is right, a concept exemplified through Arjuna’s struggle to take up arms against his cousins. Pausanias praises the ability of love to better the individual, stating, “There is a certain guidance each person needs for his whole life, if he is to live well; and nothing imparts this guidance - not high kinship, not public honor, not wealth - nothing imparts this guidance as well as Love” (10). The description of love as a means to “live well,” portrays love as a positive force which leads to self-improvement. This image of love is further reinforced when Pausanias lists the virtuous concepts of “high kinship,” “public honor” and “wealth,” and subsequently denies their value in the face of love, highlighting love’s power and ability to do good. Pausanias goes on to further venerate love when he states that a society of lovers “would be the best possible system of society, for they would hold back from all that is shameful, and seek honor in each other’s eyes” (10). The the strong language in the phrase,“best possible,” highlights Pausanias’ conviction in love as positive force. Moreover, his statement that love will cause people to “seek honor” and “hold back from all that is shameful,” highlights
He pointed out the flaws of these two models as a failure to “define humanity ‘within a nature that transcends them’”, stating that these approaches “separate ‘culture from human nature’.” The “crisis of the truth” that he speaks of refutes the idea that right and wrong, good and evil, are knowable by human reason. The truth of right and wrong comes from human nature and reasoning, but these approaches to a “civilization of love” and the intercultural approach hinge on individuals determining their own right and wrong and living accordingly. Ironically, the real truth of “Living in harmony for a civilization of love” is synonymous with justice, church social doctrine, solidarity, social charity, and a foundation of peace. All of these things are in direct contrast to the approaches mentioned in the Declaration on Christian
When I was a child, I often asked my mom what the love is. My mom always replied me with smile “ You will know when you grow up.” I looked at my mom’s eyes for the answer, but I could not find it. The question of love I asked my mom about had confused me for 20 years; However, now I get the answer: Love is simple. I now can see the love clearly between me, my young brother and parents. I was so stupid because I thought the love might be some kind of magic, but no, love is just a simple way how my family to express what “I” means to them. This is love that my mom warns me put on a coat in a cold morning; this is love that my father frequently ask me about how my school is going everyday; this is love that my younger brother shares his ice cream with me in a hot summer afternoon. To others I am just a normal college student who is living in a normal life, but to my family, I am the only thing they care about. Love does not need any thing to decorate with but a simple greeting or a simple
Love and affection is an indispensable part of human life. In different culture love may appear differently. In the poem “My god my lotus” lovers responded to each other differently than in the poem “Fishhawk”. Likewise, the presentation of female sexuality, gender disparity and presentation of love were shown inversely in these two poems. Some may argue that love in the past was not as same as love in present. However, we can still find some lovers who are staying with their partners just to maintain the relationship. We may also find some lovers having relationship only because of self-interest. However, a love relationship should always be out of self-interest and must be based on mutual interest. A love usually obtains its perfectness when it develops from both partners equally and with same affection.
Paragraph one intro-What is the origin of this universal feeling known as love? It all starts with the history of love. There really is no marked beginning of this feeling that has no evidence of its existence. It could have begun scientifically with Neanderthals, or even religiously with Adam and Eve-the theories and stories are endless. Some psychiatrists claim it begins with the Oedipal suppression, where the son feels a form of love for their mother just as their daughter would feel the same for their father. As they mature and meet a potential mate who shows similar characteristics to their parents, passionate love forms between them. There is no specific answer as to why any one person falls for a particular type of person, only theories, and approaches. In this essay, we will look at all aspects of love and just what it does to the brain as well as what parts it deactivates, the things you go
True love is a reason for everything, even deleting the laws of life. People's mistakes and weaknesses are part of life; and, without contradic...
Love is arguably the most powerful emotion possessed by mankind; it is the impalpable bond that allows individuals to connect and understand one another. Pure love is directly related to divinity. Without love, happiness and prosperity become unreachable goals. An individual that possesses all the desired superficial objects in the world stands alone without the presence of love. For centuries love has been marveled by all that dare encounter it. Countless books and poems have been transcribed to explain the phenomenon of love, but love surpasses all intellectual explanations and discussions. Love is not a definition, but rather a thought, an idea. This idea, the idea of love, burns inside us all. Instinctually, every soul on Earth is
The word “love” has always caught attention with its meanings. There have been many definitions used for this word throughout history, beginning with its start during the ninth century. With the examples of current use(from Urban Dictionary, Twitter, a student survey, a song, and a film) it is obvious that the definition of this word has been lost in translation in many different ways. Looking closely at the synonyms, along with the history and current use, the true definition is clearly seen through a usual worldly haze.
Confucianism and Taoism are religious belief systems which have co-existed in China for well over two centuries. Confucianism deals with social matters and status, while Taoism concerns itself with the search for meaning and being one with nature. I agree with the statement that Chinese philosophies and religious practices are concerned with the creation of harmony as this will be proven in this essay as the similarities and differences between Confucianism and Taoism with regards to their strategies for the creation of harmony will be analysed. Furthermore, the maintenance and restoration of harmony within the individual will be analysed in accordance with the Chinese philosophy of Yin and Yang and Qi through acupuncture. Social and cosmic harmony will also be discussed with regards to Confucianism and Taoism respectively. The conclusion will be based on beliefs of Confucianism and Taoism alike.