Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
research proposal on forensic accounting
research proposal on forensic accounting
research proposal on forensic accounting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: research proposal on forensic accounting
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the similarities and differences between a forensic accountant, a fraud examiner, and an auditor. I believe it will be beneficial to first define each of the terms, then compare and contrast them.
D. Larry Crumbley, Lester E. Heitger, and G. Stevenson Smith define forensic accounting in their book Forensic and Investigative Accounting as “the action of identifying, recording, settling, extracting, sorting, reporting, and verifying past financial data or other accounting activities for settling current or prospective legal disputes or using such past financial data for projecting future financial data to settle legal disputes” (1001 Crumbley, Heitger, Stevenson). Simply put, forensic accountants use their accounting background for “legal purposes” (1001 Crumbley, Heitger, Stevenson).
A fraud examiner is someone who may or may not be an accountant. They are called in as detectives once a forensic accountant suspects fraud. Their job is to conduct fraud examinations to find evidence that would either prove or disprove fraud. “Fraud examination only refers to antifraud matters” (Wells, The Fraud Examiners).
An auditor is an accountant that is hired to review a company’s financial statements and give an opinion on them. There are different kinds of auditor such as internal, external, and governmental, but their jobs are relatively the same. They are used to ensure that a company or organization is maintaining accurate and honest financial records so that others can use them with confidence.
Let’s start the comparison with a forensic accountant and a fraud examiner. Forensic accounting and fraud auditing are very similar jobs. Forensic accounting is a broader field that contains fraud exam...
... middle of paper ...
...ther in the way they practice, conduct, and complete their services. The majority of differences come with the specifics of the job. For example forensic accountants need to be well versed in legal knowledge. Auditors are more considered with the materiality of a project than the minor errors, while fraud examiners are looking through the minuet details, but it is clear these fields have more in common than differences.
References
Wells, Joseph T. "The Fraud Examiners." Journal Of Accountancy (2003): n.pag. Journal Of Accountancy. Oct. 2003. Web. 05 Feb. 2014.
Crumbley, D. Larry., Lester E. Heitger, and G. Stevenson. Smith. Forensic and Investigative Accounting. Chicago: CCH, 2011. Print.
Louwers, Timothy J., Robert J. Ramsay, David H. Sinason, Jerry R. Strawser, and Jay C. Thibodeau. Auditing & Assurance Services. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2011. Print.
Over one million people are employed as accountants, and most can be found in private business and industry. “Nearly 40 percent of all accountants are certified, and about 10 percent are self-employed’(Caruna, 1). In addition to openings resulting from growth, the need to replace accountants who retire or transfer to other occupations will produce thousands of job opening annually in this large occupation. The Occupational Outlook Handbook states that the expansion of accountants is related to: “increasingly complex taxation, growth in both the size and the number of business corporations required to release financial reports to stockholders, a more general use of accounting in the management of business, and outsourcing of a...
Some forensic accountants specialize in specific industries that are susceptible to fraud. Insurance and banking industries are considered a higher risk for fraud. These accountants learn their business practices of these fields in order to understand what is happening and be able to stop the fraud. They need to be discrete when they are conducting these investigations in order to keep the identity of the individuals and companies private. In the article, how forensic Accounting works, states that “they must be independent and impartial, taking into account both the financial records and the conduct of employees.” Forensic accountants are looking for signs of fraud as they are conducting their audits and examining financial statements to determine whether they are accurate and complete. They need to look beyond the numbers in order to discover the fraud that is taking place and anticipate criminal actions.
Fraud auditing is an intentional misinterpretation to obtain benefit. (Mintz and Morris 2008, p.53) It includes financial reporting frauds and misappropriation of assets, which are best represented by misstatement of debts in Enron scandal and theft of assets in Tyco International Scandal respectively.
Accounting is basically a service activity. Its purpose is to provide quantitative information that principally used by the managers, investors, tax authorities, and other decision makers to make the financial decisions within companies, organizations, and public agencies. Accounting is also widely known as the “language of business.” An accountant measures, communicates, and interprets financial activities. They prepare financial statements or reports for individuals, businesses, government agencies, or other non-profit organizations. They use the accounting systems to categorize the expenses and income to the typical groups. They also keep tract of the money received or paid out to see if the transactions are accurate and complete. Accountants are familiar with the computer operation. They use the computer...
Collecting, Analyzing and evaluating evidential matter is at the heart of forensic accountants’ work. A forensic accountant wears many hats including being an identifier of issues, gathering information and documentation, analyzing people and then reporting on their findings. There are many areas of financial disputes and investigations in which forensic accountants are typically involved which includes but is not limited to fraud investigations, construction claims, bankruptcy, business valuation, expert testimony, personal injury and wrongful death and many more. Communication skills and objectivity, investigative mentality, understanding of rules of evidence are much needed facets for a forensic accountant. So, in the process of covering
...lak, S., Clayton, M., & Pill, J. (2011). A Guide to Forensic Accounting Investigation (2nd ed.). Hoboken, N.J.: J. Wiley.
... associated to civil disputes. Forensic accountants are also identified as fraud investigators, investigative accountants, forensic auditors or fraud auditors.Forensic accountants are also increasingly playing more proactive risk reduction roles by devising and performing extended procedures as part of the statutory audit, acting as consultants to audit committees fraud deterrence engagements, and aiding in investment analyst research.
When I hear the word ‘Forensic’ the idea and image of a homicide investigation in which evidence gathered is analyzed at a laboratory to determine ‘who done it’. Shows like CSI, Bones, Law and Order depicts the forensic aspect in their broadcast. Being a registered nurse, another thought comes to mind when hearing the term ‘forensic’. I like to watch Dr. G medical examiner on the Discovery channel. That is a reality show regarding investigative research on how a person died. This is done by performing an autopsy and analyzing the pathological reason for a death to determine if foul play was involved. However, I rarely placed the thought that accounting can have a forensic aspect, too. I was always under the impression that auditors were the forensic accountants. Internal Revenue Agents to audit income tax filings to make sure all income are reported, and deductions have receipts as supporting evidence. Certified Internal Auditors to look at business operations and financial statements within a corporation to make sure internal controls are in place, financial statements are properly recorded, and government regulations have been met. External auditors perform audits for SEC compliance and to attest that the company is in good standings to ensure protection of the public interest. These auditors, in essence, would be able to detect fraud in their job when reviewing audit trails and documentations. Needless to say, I my conception have been construed. There is a whole new field of accounting that is on the rise, which specifically deals with fraud detection. This is called Forensic Accounting. This area sparked my interest.
Sometimes fraud may be created and concealed in a way that is so well-organized that it might be overlooked if auditors fail to perform reasonable care and skills. This always happens in entities that have knowledgeable people in accounting, finance and so on. Therefore, every auditor must maintain a questioning mind throughout the audit and set in his mind that material misstatement due to fraud may exist even though his past experience with the clients shows that the clients are indeed
Kent has a misconception that auditors have no specific duties regarding fraud. Furthermore, Kent also mentions that auditor provides no assurances about fraud because that is management’s job. In fact, auditors do not have duty to detect fraud. However, it is an auditor responsibility to detect material misstatements in the financial statement. Auditors are required to identify and assess the risk of material misstatement due to fraud and design procedures to detect such misstatement.
...pendence, whether pro forma or substantially, the quality of professional assurance service of professional accountants will be doubted by public and that will probably lead to serious results. The factors affecting independence of external auditors are multiple. Market competition among external auditors and the imperfection of laws regulated the external auditing industry are tow of most important factors. In order to maintain and guarantee the independence of external auditors and try to avoid the scandals like Arthur Andersen, some research on how to improve and maintain the independence of external auditors are necessary. It is possible for researchers to put emphasis on how to control the market competition among auditing organizations and enhance the ability of accounting regulators to supervise and manage the professional accounting industry in the future.
As internal auditors are integral parts of corporate governance, therefore their contribution is to ensuring the reliability and integrity for the financial statements of the company. Internal audit are also contribute in such as way where they are evaluating the operational performance of a company, ensuring the effectiveness of internal control system. Besides, internal auditors also review the financial reports to ensure its integrity and transparency so that useful and reliable information are available for the decision making. Moreover, this is to ensure a responsible governance is carried out and prevent fraud from happening. If so happen fraud occurs, internal auditors are there to carry their job to detect the fraud and correct the fraud especially in the financial statements which may threaten the reliability and quality of reports (Mihaela Ungureanu,
Auditors have a role to report an independent opinion regarding the truth and fairness of financial information presented to them by management which enhances the financial reporting system. The need for independence arises because, generally, users of financial statements do not have all the information necessary to judge the objectivity of the auditor. Auditors must not
An accountant makes sure that the Nation’s firms are run efficiently, the public records are kept accurately, and that taxes are paid properly and on time (“Accountants and Auditors”). Accounting is the study of how a business tracks their income, assets, expenses, and many other things for a period of time. They also do many other things like quality management, tax strategy, and health care benefits management (“Welcome to Careers in Accounting”). An accountant is crucial to the success of a business, without one the business tends to fail.
The evolution of auditing is a complicated history that has always been changing through historical events. Auditing always changed to meet the needs of the business environment of that day. Auditing has been around since the beginning of human civilization, focusing mainly, at first, on finding efraud. As the United States grew, the business world grew, and auditing began to play more important roles. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, people began to invest money into large corporations. The Stock Market crash of 1929 and various scandals made auditors realize that their roles in society were very important. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed, and became easier with the use of internal controls. These controls introduced the need for testing; not an in-depth detailed audit. Auditing jobs would have to change to meet the changing business world. The invention of computers impacted the auditors’ world by making their job at times easier and at times making their job more difficult. Finally, the auditors’ job of certifying and testing companies’ financial statements is the backbone of the business world.