The Medibank Australia was founded by the Australian government in 1976, as the Medibank is a largest private health insurer in Australia. The government believes now it’s time for them to move forward and privatise the Medibank at the end of this financial year or next financial year. The reasons why the government is privatising Medibank, is to retain the service and excellence of stages of Medibank clients, ensure the sale development treats medibank workers in a decent manner, as well as to reduce any problems sole over the post years, such as liabilities of the government. Thus, it will help the government by bringing more powers within the business of private health insurance, by competing with others country.
Moreover, privatising Medibank will bring great values and health result to all the residents in Australia. On one hand, the government will still put a massive useful, virtuous and viable for the private health insurance business (Medibank. 2014). This essay will examine the goods and service that privatization provides and why the Australian government should privatise the Medibank
One of the good reason why the Australian government should privatise the Medibank to the business owner, is since that public sector works are undertaken to meet the needs of community whereby the private sector works are more straightforward with a massive focusing on achieving the prospects of profit. By selling the Medibank to the private sector, means the Australian government will be able to receive profit from it which could help those residents in need as well as supporting the states with 15 percent of payments to help the Australian government with a new equipment that they required, instance building roads, education and new...
... middle of paper ...
...(Csaba, Laszlo, 1994 p28).
Works Cited
Medibank. 2014. Privatisation of Medibank. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.medibank.com.au/about-us/privatisation/. [Accessed 05 May 14].
The Australian. 2014. National Affairs. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/coalitions-10bn-asset-clearance/story-fn59niix-1226905277289#. [Accessed 06 May 14].
Hubbard, R, Glenn, 2013. Essential of Economics. 2nd ed. Australia: Pearson Australia
Fran Collyer, Jim McMaster and Roger Wettenhall, 2001. Public Enterprise Divestment. 1st ed. Pacific Institute of Management and Development: South Pacific.vernment
Roth, Gabriel, 1987. The Private Provision of Public Service in Developing Countries. 1st ed. United State of America: Oxford University
Csaba, Laszlo, 1994. Privatization, Liberalization and Destruction. 1st ed. England: Dartmouth
Willis, E, Reynolds, L & Keleher, H 2012, Understanding the australian health care system, Mosby Elesvier, Chatswood, NSW.
In this paper, there will be a comparative analysis to the United States (U.S.) healthcare system and Canadians healthcare system highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of both.
I agree with Heath’s argument that a two-tier health care system is effective as long as it does not undermine the integrity of the public insurance mechanism. The main argument against the two-tier health care system is that doctors will turn away from the public sector to pursue a higher income within a private practice. The concern arises that this will cause a scarcity of doctors within the public sector. I believe this argument is invalid and will discuss throughout this paper why the two-tier system improves upon health care systems in many ways.
On December 29th, 1999, Nancy MacBeth leader of the Alberta liberal party was cited in the Edmonton Journal as saying: “ There’s ‘ample evidence’ that the Alberta government’s plan to expand the role of private health-care will contravene the Canada Health Act.” This is the strongest argument against privatization. It reflects the fears of many Albertans and Canadians; the fear that a two-tier system similar to that of the United States will develop. The fear that the system which was built upon values reflected in five principles will be eroded and replaced and that they will be the ones left to suffer the consequences. Privatization of health care would undermine the principles of the Canada Health Act and as such would undermine the integrity of the health care system.
Australia has an ageing population, an ageing population by its very nature dictates a bigger burden than there already is on the health care system. It also means more money will be spent on health care as the progression increases. The privatisation of Medibank will create more competition in the health insurance market; the health insurance business is valued at $4 billion dollars, which would in turn help Australia’s economic position. Privatisation would allow for create a free market and allow for regulation to focus on competition of the market.
Recently, Canada’s health-care delivery system has undergone changes, affecting access to services. Although Canada’s public health-care system is universal, privatization of health-care services has increased in the past two decades (Ives et al., 2015, p. 150-151). Privatization is “a
Newman, Alex. “Examining Healthcare: A Look Around the Globe at Nationalized Systems.” The New American. 15 Sep. 2008: 10. eLibrary. Web. 04 Nov. 2013.
The introductory of Canada’s health care system in the mid-20th century, known as Medicare, led the country into the proud tradition of a public health care system, opposite to America’s privatized health care system in the south. Though Canada’s health care system still holds some aspects of a privatized system, it is still readily available for all citizens throughout the nation. After continuous research, it is clear to state that public health care and the association it has with welfare state liberalism is by far a more favourable option for Canada, than that of private health care and the association it has with neo-conservatism. To help understand why public health care is a better and more favourable option for Canada, it is fundamental
Applying Australia as a specific example, it can be rationalized that the introduction of a parallel public and private system in Canada could be economically miscalculated. Australia’s health care system incorporates both parallel public/private and co-payment models in an attempt to balances public financing with out-of-pocket payments and private insurance (Tuohy et al., 2004). Historically, private insurance has been declining in Australia for a variety of reasons. In the late 1990s, the Australian government attempted to address these various reasons to increase the private insurance market through unprecedented levels—over $2 billion per year-of public subsidy. These efforts were successful in reversing the decline, but only occurred through a highly debatable use of public funds (Tuohy et al., 2004). Thus, Australians were paying taxes to support both systems, creating a highly unstable system marked by economic uncertainty that could similarly plague a “two-tier” system in
The Australian health care system comprises both the public and the private health sub-sectors. The health care system concerns itself with the financing, formulation, implementation, evaluation, and reforming of health services. The main sources of f...
Healthcare plays an important role in almost every person’s life at one point or another. Many times, one can get caught without, or underinsured and it can be detrimental to their livelihood. With the rising cost of healthcare, it is likely that having a national healthcare policy in place, and as an individual, being able to afford and obtain adequate health insurance has not been required until now. With the new national healthcare plan, it is required for all citizens to obtain and maintain some sort of public or private insurance policy. The rising costs can be attributed to many things. A significant reason for the astronomical cost of health care is because of the staggering amount of uninsured or underinsured individuals receiving medical attention and almost many never paying the bill. Those who do have insurance have seen a gradual increase in their premiums and deductibles to make up for this.
The basis of health reform is built on the fundamental structures of politics, medicine, and society. Medicine is a continuously changing field that requires the adaptation to different techniques and situations. Contradicting the evolving medical field, the advancement of health policies have remained at a standstill as changes are rarely made. The loss of resources and efficiency in the overall health system is the result of a lack of correlation between the evolving field of medicine and the progression of an inclusive health insurance. Antonia Maioni, the author of Parting at the Crossroads: The Development of Health Insurance in Canada and the United States, emphasize the vast similarities pertaining to healthcare services, medical research
With the continued rise in health care cost, Nathan Kaufman wrote an article where he expressed a belief that a failure in the U.S. health care system is inevitable. Kaufman compares the fall of the health care system to the epic collapse of the real state market in 2007. In this essay we will explore how the rising cost of health care effects will affect a case in the market and how organizations can prepare for the assumed crash if the U.S. health care system.
M. Petrescu, e. a. (2010). Public Management: between the Traditional and New Model. Review of International Comparative 408 Management , 411.
Good, David A. “The Politics of Public Management.” University of Toronto Press Inc., (2003). P. 1-233.