The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states, that since there is a necessity for a Free State and regulated militia, the right of the American people to keep and bear arms would not be infringed by the United States government. One cannot stop and wonder the calamities that are caused by guns in their completely proper usage. This nation needs to have a talk over its malignant obsession with guns. Let those, who, of course, will reject such a policy, however strongly it is supported by evidence, tell us what they are going to do about gun violence. Improve mental health services? A good idea, assuming they will vote for the required spending, as well as recognize that there is no way such an improvement will make more than a marginal difference given the difficulties in both diagnosing who is prone to violence and in treating those individuals. Enforce the laws on the books? Let them remove the blocks they have put in place to prevent these laws from being enforced. There are many viable options to debate for gun control, even if domestic disarmament does not become the norm, but it at least, can move the discussion to the left more. If concessions are given before the argument begins then one will not be successful in debating and controlling gun violence. Multitudes of facts about gun violence hinder the belief many have for keeping their weapons. One of the most logical and most disturbing facts is that shooting sprees are not rare in the United States. “Since 1982, there have been at least 61 mass murders carried out with firearms across the country, with the killings unfolding in 30 states from Massachusetts to Hawaii, and in most cases, the killers had obtained their weapons legally” (Klein). As bluntl... ... middle of paper ... ...legal weapons in the hands of bad people. The United States should cease it obsession with weapons and at least attempt to hinder this development with any means necessary. This nation must limit the amounts of weapons in the hands of criminals and those that would use them incorrectly. Works Cited Florida, Richard. Atlantic Cities Place Matters. 22 January 2013. 20 February 2013 . Klein, Ezra. Washington Post. 14 December 2012. 20 February 2013 . Miller, Matthew, Deborah Azrael and David Hemenway. Harvard School Of Public Health. 15 December 2012. 20 february 2013. Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York: Penguin Books, 1937.
According to www.archives.gov, the second amendment of the United States Constitution reads that: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment is
... can be put into place so that gun control does not limit law-abiding citizens from keeping guns on their property or person and protecting themselves or others when necessary.
The controversy over assault rifles is one of the most problematic issues related to the contributions of gangs, drug traffickers, and most criminal activity. More often than not, criminals have access to the weapons of their choice more easily than it should be. Getting them from licensed dealers, black markets, and family members’ homes, the availability of these militia weapons has become to effortless to obtain. The rise of criminal activity is part of the reason more than one-third of high school students have easy access to a weapon or gun. “Four out of five guns brought to school are actually brought from their own homes” (Page par 2). This is one of the biggest problems when faced with where criminals get their guns. They either steal them from relative’s homes, ask to borrow them, or steal them from licensed sellers. There are a lot of ways people can get guns. People who should not be able to purchase a firearm are allowed to, and illegal transactions are also a huge issue with criminals getting their guns. For all these reasons that is why Government should require restricted gun ownership to protect society, prevent crime, and allow for recreational use.
...ough tougher gun regulations. It is reasonable to state that disarming civilians through stricter gun laws is the best method to reduce crime. As President Barack Obama stated during the Obama-Romney 2012 debate on October 16th, 2012, “We're a nation that believes in the Second Amendment, and I believe in the Second Amendment...My belief is that we have to enforce the laws we've already got, make sure that we're keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, those who are mentally ill. We've done a much better job in terms of background checks, but we've got more to do when it comes to enforcement. But weapons that were designed for soldiers in war theaters don't belong on our streets. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced. But part of it is also looking at other sources of the violence” ("Barack Obama on Gun Control", n.d., para. 3).
When it comes to controversial topics in today’s society, there are so many that it can be difficult to be a straight shooter. Among all of them, however, debate over gun control has been prevalent for so long, it is something many people can easily set their sights on. It is an issue everybody should have an opinion on, as it is vastly important, potentially threatening, and all too present in modern society. Many find the mere concept of gun control invasive to their constitutional rights, while others see lack of gun control to be astoundingly dangerous and entirely chimerical. Protection of oneself and their rights may or may not be more important than hundreds of lives lost potentially due to fairly unrestricted gun ownership. The mere question would bring many to ear-shattering debate, and for good reason. Screams of constitutional neglect and of humanistic lethargy would likely be heard miles away. This debate would be very much on target though, as there are many valid points from either side and it is a topic that must be thought out very carefully to avoid potential catastrophe. Recent events leading to deaths of many American citizens enough to dictate the need for stricter gun control, although such action may really be meaningless and infringe upon the core rights established by the country’s founders themselves, meaning some values of gun control may help, but ultimately it is a futile attempt.
The second amendment says, "A well regulated militia being necessary to security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The second amendment was made for two things. It is there for first, to guarantee the individuals right to have arms for self-defense and self-preservation. The second reason is related to the militia. The right to carry a handgun for self-protection is a privilege of citizenship. The confusion is the right of the state or the individual. The regulation of handguns could be looked at as unconstitutional. The amendment is for the people and not the state.
One of the most controversial topics of the year is the argument on guns and the government attempting to ban and control certain guns. This topic has always been in disagreement among the American public but has recently become much more popular after several large-scale shootings such as the infamous Sandy Hook. Despite gun control appearing to be the solution to these tragic events, controlling and banning guns will simply not work. Why will it not work and why is it so bad? Because it has not worked before, current gun control laws and attempted laws target the wrong guns, banning the targeted guns or any guns for that matter will not prevent mass shootings, and it infringes on our constitutional rights as Americans. Together, we will not only be addressing these issues, but we will provide well thought out answers to many arguments that pro-gun control advocates can retaliate with.
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.
The second amendment of the United States Constitution was created to ensure that the citizens are able to protect themselves when they feel harm. When the second amendment was created the times were different and gun violence was not such a debatable issue. The founding fathers never expected that 68% of the murders in the United States are composed of the use of firearms. The framers of the United states constitution put in place the second amendment to protect citizens from attacks and slave revolts. Due to the recent events involving weapon use, the citizens of the United States should be protected by placing strict restrictions on the use of weapons.
The Framers created the Second Amendment to allow states the option to form militias or armies to prevent another uprising similar to Shay`s Rebellion. Since the federal government had no standing military this significant event showed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation. Today, United States citizens exercise this right regularly for protection, hunting or collection purposes; either way this right is extremely popular amongst citizens and gun owners. However, a plethora of individuals have abused the right of owning gun through senseless acts of violence. The more people learn about the violence and crime rates in our own country, the quicker everyone will realize that we need immediate change before there`s a war between people and guns.
Gun restriction is a controversial issue in the United States nowadays. This issue needs to be resolved sooner than later because civilian’s lives might be in danger. Many civilians in the United States believe that gun control violates the second Amendment "right to bear arms". However, guns are harmful weapons that shouldn't be played with. They need to be restricted. Guns especially should be restricted from people with criminal records and people with mental illness who have records of acting violent. Finally, implementing stricter gun laws might help save lives and reduce gun violence and firearm death rate in the United States.
Not everyone is here to do the right thing so taking a little more time to evaluate every single person purchasing a gun will most likely lower gun violence. For example we could have gun owner go through a test every couple months to keep your gun license and to make sure you're in the right state of mind to own a gun. We could also have safety courses offered for the families of those who own a gun. Somewhat of a what not to do around guns seminar to keep the families safe as
Living in the South, firearms are a part of people's’ lives, as some like to hunt or shoot for fun. Some people respect firearms, as they are used to protect the country. In other parts of the country, guns are perceived as highly dangerous weapons that cause crime to happen. Both of these points are true, and people on both sides will not give up their opinion. Siding with the “guns are dangerous” side, it is true that firearms are used in a deadly capacity more often than used recreationally. Several things have been done to try to prevent gun violence, but the amount of firearm related deaths remains high. In order to prevent this, legislation needs to restrict the limits of gun distribution and production, be made aware of those who own a firearm, and educate the people who like to use guns.
“Preventing everyday gun violence is hard, and it’s not going to happen overnight. Curing gun violence of criminals would require serious attempts to understand how guns get into their hands in the first place. Criminals have only a few ways to get a gun, assuming they can’t pass a background check — buying it at a gun show or online, buying it on the black market, or stealing it”(Johnson). As long as the guns are generally owned by people, criminals can always find the way to get guns and maximize their damage to the society. “We know that this is so, because, in societies that have effective gun control, children rarely, rarely, rarely die of gunshots. Let’s worry tomorrow about the problem of Evil. Let’s worry more about making sure that when the Problem of Evil appears in a first-grade classroom, it is armed with a penknife”(Gopnik). Taking away criminals’ tools can be an efficient way to protect people for getting hurt badly, however “‘Politicians are far too cowardly to address gun violence . . . which keeps us from taking practical measures to avoid senseless shootings’”(Baum). Therefore, the government should be blamed for neglecting the fact that gun increases the damage of the violence. Hence, the government should carry out strict gun regulations in order to keep the nation in
Both supporters and opponents of gun control agree that some means should be found to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Not surprisingly, the two sides approach the issue differently. The two different strategies for gun control involve “deterrence” (discouraging by instilling fear) and “ interdiction” (legally forbidding the use of) Advocates of deterrence, most notably the Second Amendment Foundation and the NRA, recommend consistent enforcement of current laws and instituting tougher penalties to discourage individuals from using firearms in cr...