The Second Amendment

1620 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Does gun control reduce crime

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” - Second Amendment. Throughout history, this sentence of twenty seven words has caused an intense debate. The polemic is that some people claim that a gun control policy is unconstitutional, while others disagree and even say it is necessary in order to reduce crime. Now, what does gun control mean? If it means to analyze who is responsible enough to own a gun by a “Universal Background Check”; that sounds right to everyone. But in the article “What Are Obama’s Gun Control Proposals? An Easy Guide” published in the National Journal by Matt Vasilogambros. The author states that the “gun-control package” that President Obama proposed “included proposals to ban assault weapons”. A firearm gives you power, to defend yourself or to kill someone else. You make the decision of how will you use that power. The constitution gives you the right to bear arms and any law that tries to revoke this is unconstitutional. If the people allow gun control it will be like opening the door to a tyrannical government, guns are not the problem, is the bad attention towards education, poverty and job opportunities.
A disarmed society is in danger of being oppressed by its government, but an armed society can cause harm within its own citizens. Many people believe that gun control is the solution to fight crime. After the fatal event of Newtown, where a shooter took the lives of 20 children and six employers at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, the gun control topic became again a very sensitive one. The American society was shocked by how 26 lives were lost within minutes. In the article “Time Line o...

... middle of paper ...

...3: 2. Print.
Natelson, Rob. "The Founders and the 2nd Amendment." Tenth Amendment Center [San Jose] 1 Apr. 2013: 3. Print.
Plumer, Brad. "Just how easy is it to buy a gun over the Internet?." The Washington Post 5 Aug. 2013: 2. Print.
R. RUMBAUGH, JAMES . "Call the Second Amendment Freedom Insurance." The New York times 4 July 1990: 2. www,nytimes.com. Web. 2 Dec. 2013.
Schwardtz, Jack. "Gun-Control Foes Misunderstand the Intent of the Second Amendment." The Daily Beast [San Jose] 18 Dec. 2012: 1. Print.
Sowell, Thomas. " Do Gun-Control Laws Control Guns? ." National Review [Washington] 22 Feb. 2013: 1. Print.
Vasilogambros, Matt. "What Are Obama's Gun Control Proposals? An Easy Guide." National Journal [New York] 16 Jan. 2013: 1. Print.
"Automatic Bibliography Maker." BibMe: Fast & Easy Bibliography Maker. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2013. .

Show More
Related

  • America Needs Background Checks for Gun Purchases

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    Carter, Gregg Lee, ed. “Federal Gun Laws.” Gun Control in the United States: A Reference

    Read More

  • Analysis Of 'The Armed Citizen In The Early Republic' By Robert E. Shalhope

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since its ratification in December of 1791, the Second Amendment has created a major controversy as Americans have been arguing over the meaning and interpretation of the amendment. Due to the controversy, “angry polarization and distortion, rather

    Read More

  • Breaking The Spell King's Approach To Civil Disobedience

    630 Words  | 2 Pages

    In America the Amendment 1 of the U.S. Constitution gives the American people the right to peaceably assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Most notably Amendment 1 is known for and most often cited as giving the Freedom of Speech. Even before this amendment was ratified people in the U.S. were protesting, as in the Boston Tea Party. Protesting has been a way to effect change in America. A question to ask is this: is there a right way or wrong way to protest.

    Read More

  • Revision of the Eighth Amendment

    887 Words  | 2 Pages

    October 5, 2013 in Cornell Law. CRS/LII Annotated Constitution of the United States. Cornell University Law School, Inc. 2013. The. Web. The Web.

    Read More

  • Gun Control: America Needs Better Background Checks

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    Doeden, Matt. Gun Control: Preventing Violence or Crushing Constitutional Rights? Minneapolis: Lerner, 2012. 7- 61-63. Print.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment: Why It Is Important to Our Country

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    One reason we must have the second amendment is to protect the freedom for which our country fought so hard to win. The Declaration of Independence states: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”[1] However, if these rights were ‘self-evident’, why did the founding fathers need to grant them to the states? We might as well ask why man is the way that he is, imperfect. We all wonder about this sad truth, but the fact remains that man is fallen. These rights are self-evident, obvious to human reason, but because humans are fallen, we are sometimes blinded to these apparent truths and we err in our rationality. King George was blind to these unalienable rights, as were Na...

    Read More

  • The Controversy of the Second Amendment of the Constitution

    997 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Second Amendment to the Constitution(Second Amendment) of the United States of America(USA) is one of the most controversial. The Second Amendment specifically grants that, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed"

    Read More

  • The First Amendment

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    The First Amendment is the first section of the Bill of Rights and is often considered the most important part of the U.S Constitution because it guarantees the citizens of United States the essential personal freedoms of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly and the freedom to petition the Government. Thanks to the rights granted by the First Amendment, Americans are able to live in a country where they can freely express themselves, speak their mind, pray without interference, protest in peace and where their opinions are taken into consideration, which is something not many other nationalities have the fortune of saying. The Founding Fathers were the framers of the Constitution of the U.S., and the responsible for the elaboration of the First Amendment. The majority of the Founding Fathers were enlightenment thinkers who were in love with liberty, and thought that basic political rights were inevitable for man’s nature. After having experienced the tyranny from their mother countries, the Founding Fathers carefully constructed the Constitution of the United States in a way where tyranny was avoided and a government for the people, by the people and of the people was developed, which is clearly reflected in the Constitution. At the time of inception of the United States, the Founding Fathers created the First Amendment in order to ensure that the government would not interfere with Americans’ basic civil rights. The rights outlined on the First Amendment were considered so important by these leaders that many states refused to ratify the Constitution of the United Sates until there was a conjecture of amendments that would protect individual rights in the future.

    Read More

  • An Argument for Gun Control

    2438 Words  | 5 Pages

    Rauch, Jonathan. “The Right Kind of Gun Rights.” National Journal Vol. 40 Issue 11. Academic Search Complete. 15 Mar. 2013. Web. 6 June 2015.

    Read More

  • District of Columbia v. Heller: The Use and Permit of Handguns

    1536 Words  | 4 Pages

    Jonsson, Patrik. "Gun Debate: Is Price of an Armed America a More Dangerous America?" Christian Science Monitor. 02 Feb. 2014: n. p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.

    Read More

  • Poverty and Crime in America

    3673 Words  | 8 Pages

    Wilson, H. (2007). Guns, gun control, and elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

    2184 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals’ access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted.

    Read More

  • The Effects and Consequences of Gun Control

    2071 Words  | 5 Pages

    “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms. Although this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive; they exacerbate the problem instead of fixing it. Besides the fact that the American Constitution guarantees its citizens the right to bear arms, the idea of restricting gun ownership in order to reduce firearm-related violence would ultimately fail given the previous experiments of gun control in England and in numerous states.

    Read More

  • Informative Speech For Gun Ownership

    650 Words  | 2 Pages

    Professional champions of civil rights and civil liberties have been unwilling to defend the underlying principle of the right to arms. Even the conservative defense has been timid and often inept, tied less, one suspects, to abiding principle and more to the dynamics of contemporary Republican politics. Thus a right older than the Republic, one that the drafters of two constitutional amendments the Second and the Fourteenth intended to protect, and a right whose critical importance has been painfully revealed by twentieth-century history, is left undefended by the lawyers, writers, and scholars we routinely expect to defend other constitutional rights. Instead, the Second Amendment’s intellectual as well as political defense has been left in the unlikely hands of the National Rifle Association (NRA). And although the NRA deserves considerably better than the demonized reputation it has acquired, it should not be the sole or even principal voice in defense of a major constitutional provision.

    Read More

  • Should Gun Control Laws be Stricter?

    1343 Words  | 3 Pages

    Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says “The term gun control as it is used in the United States refers to any action taken by the federal government or by state or local governments to regulate, through legislation, the sale, purchase, safety, and use of handguns and other types of firearms by individual citizens.” According to this idea gun control laws should be stricter and people should not be able to have access to guns easily. However, there are many other people who believe this idea is not a good solution and never help. This essay will demonstrate for and against views about the topic. People who agree with this idea consider: firstly, stricter laws will reduce violence and gun control means crime control. Secondly, some research shows people with gun are more at risks of getting shot. Thirdly, guns can always be misused by their owners and finally, stricter law is the best and the faster way to control crime and make community safe. While opponents say first of all, guns are necessary for people safety and protection. Secondly, guns are not the only tools for killing and violence; there are other weapons too and finally, gun ownership is human rights.

    Read More

More about The Second Amendment

Open Document