One of the primary reasons for parents choosing to send their child to a private school is due to the many pre-conceived notions that private schools carry regarding their overall reputations. There are three main misconceptions that will be addressed here. These misconceptions are: the misconception of parental choice in selecting a school; more qualified teachers with the most current teaching knowledge; and the myth that private schools are more successful than public schools.
Many proponents of a nationwide standardized voucher program argue that such a system will provide parents and students with the opportunity to choose the school in which the child will attend. In fact, the opposite is true. Unlike public schools that are required by law to accept every child, private schools can choose who their students will be. Private schools do not need to accept the fifth grader who is autistic or the eighth grader reading at a third grade level. These factors simplify education and therefore further resources can be placed on the “norm” as opposed to students with disabilities. Indeed, in the voucher system, there is very little parental choice instead the choice is dependent on the private institution (Myth vs. Fact, 2002).
The misconception of parental choice can also correlate to the next misconception, which is that private schools are more successful than public schools. This idea is misleading as well. To date, there is no statistical data that shows private schools are achieving at a greater level than students in public schools. The reason for this can be several fold. First, we have the issue of accountability; second, we have the issue of the liberty of private schools to pick and choose their students;...
... middle of paper ...
...ristian Schools International responded with, “No… every class is permeated with Christian religious viewpoint.” We can argue that these responses only further exemplify the need of a separation between church and state.
The separation of church and state is one of the most cherished features of our democracy. A voucher system would compel taxpayers to subsidize religious teachings with which they may disagree. Instead of relying on vouchers to “save” the American educational system, we should continue to search for solutions that will be available to every student such as: smaller classes, improved teacher training, and adequate resources. Voucher programs clearly fall short of the separation of church and state notion. Let us not undermine the great tradition of this separation, and continue to take into account the important legacy of the First Amendment.
The idea that vouchers give parents a choice of schools for their children is simply incorrect. The only people who have any real choice in the matter are the private...
She realized that choice and accountability were not the answer, but that curriculum and instruction were more viable solutions to America’s educational dilemma. Ravitch suggests that to abandon public schools is to abandon the institution that supports our concepts of democracy and citizenship and to the promise of American life (Ravitch, 2011, p. 12-14). The idea of school choice is rooted in Milton Friedman’s essay concerning the government’s role in education. Friedman asserted that society should support and contribute to the maximum freedom of the individual or the family. He maintained that the government should provide vouchers to help support parents financially on their children’s education, which parents could use at the school of their choosing; so long as the school met set standards. Therefore, this creation of choice would stimulate competition, which Friedman believed would increase the development and improvement of nonpublic schools, as well as, create a variety of school options (Ravitch, 2011, p. 115). As a result of the choice movement, the public received three versions of school choice: voucher schools, private schools, and charter schools. Each of these schools receives public funding, but do not operate as traditional public schools, and are not managed by a government agency (Ravitch, 2011, p. 121). Charter schools became the most popular choice of this new
Why would anyone wish to withhold support for a program that has the potential to revolutionize the, often, insufficient American education system? This question has undoubtedly entered the mind of proponents of education voucher systems across the country. However, despite the pressure placed on legislators everywhere, close scrutiny of the real issues should not be clouded by public fervor. It is my belief that, after a thorough examination of the merits of such programs, school vouchers would be a gross detriment to both the American education system and the nation itself.
Vouchers have grown into an important and powerful tool that government can use to provide directed goods and services to specific groups. Voucher systems have become a highly effective tool that is not only used for food/nutritional and housing services, but secondary educational and child-care services, as well. Although voucher systems continue to remain a heated public and political debate, success stories, as the one mentioned in the case examined will only give rise to such systems in the provisioning of public education in years to come.
Public School Choice is an easy program to understand and it contains many advantages but also many disadvantages. Public School Choice is when parents can elect to send their children out of a school that has not made adequate yearly progress for two consecutive years into a school that has made progress. (McClure, 2002) If there are no available schools within the original school district, then a family can choose to send their children to another district. This only happens when the other schools in the original district are all labeled as ‘underachieving schools’ and have not made the adequate yearly progress. (McClure, 2002)
Lately we have seen proposals for vouchers. These vouchers are public money given to low income family so they may send their kids to private schools. Most of the schools who use this program are religious. In the Cleveland voucher program we see there were 3,761 children are enrolled and 96 percent of those children are attending religious schools. Also 82 percent of the participating schools were sectarian. This voucher program was challenged in the 6th circuit court with the Simmons-Harris v. Zelman case. It was ruled the Cleveland voucher program “clearly has the impermissible effect on promoting sectarian schools”.
Recent trends toward privatizing schools and relieving them of state requirements wrongly imply that schools should mirror the desires of parents and ignore the public's interest in having citizens educated for democracy.
Strauss, Valerie. "Vouchers and the Future of Public Education." Web log post. Washington Post. The Washington Post, 05 June 2012. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.
The pros and cons in the school voucher debate. 2002. Pagewise, Inc. 3 Jan. 2005. .
Private schools charge tuition, this tuition is used to fund the school, pay teachers and any other expense the school faces. (Niche) For many private schools, this cost is far less than favorable “charges at many private secondary boarding schools are now touching $50,000. Outrageous, many say.” (Asen) Many Americans are incapable of even affording private school, making it as an option not only unfavorable but also impossible. If a family can 't afford the steep tuition of private school that leaves public school as the only option. “ Public education to mean schools that were publicly supported, publicly controlled, open to all, and tuition-free.” (Cutler III 442) Public schools are funded by the Government so the quality of the school isn 't dependent on how much tuition is. When it comes down to it, Private school could supply students with beautiful atmosphere and higher paid/more motivated teachers if one is willing to pay the price, while public school is free and the government is in
Throughout the country, students and parents have access to additional schooling options through busing efforts, magnet schools, charter schools, open enrollment initiatives and tuition vouchers. At the most basic level, the contention lies debate to decide whether or not school choice should be an option. Is it a good idea or bad idea? Some experts feel that educational choice is a core freedom and therefore asking if it is a good idea is a mute-point (Fuller, 2002). On a deeper level of this debate are low-income families who seemingly have the most to gain from the opportunity to reach outside restrictions of their neighborhoods to access quality learning (Archbald,
Today, a solid education is what any parent should desire for their child. Without that education there is really no successful future ahead of them. Many parents and teachers have been very supportive of the Common Core Standards, but many are against it and feel that it puts an unnecessary strain on students, parents, and teachers. Several states now offer vouchers that give students the opportunity to attend private schools if the student or parents feel that their education goals are not being met through the public school system. But how beneficial are these vouchers to everyone, including taxpayers? It seems that more research needs to be done to see what the real cost is, if it truly allows children from low income families to attend without a financial burden, and to see if the students transferring from public schools to private schools are becoming more successful in achieving their educational goals.
Many people in today’s society believe it’s wise to send their children to private schools. In making the decision on whether to put children in public or private schools, they look to four main factors: curriculum, class size, the graduation rate, and cost. When people have to pay for something, their first thought is, “Will I be getting what I’m paying for?” With a private school education, the amount you have to pay is usually well worth it. Public schools offer diversity. Here students can find people who are just like them and can associate better. Wherever you live, you have to send your child to the closest school. There’s no choice on what public school you can send your child to, whereas for private schools you can pick to send your child there. It’s not an easy choice for parents to decide, but many factors point toward a guarantee that a good education would be achieved, which is most important.
For some parents, deciding on a school for their children can be a difficult decision. Many parents do not spend much time thinking about it; they place their children into the local school designated by where they live. Others attended a private school themselves and found that it was a beneficial experience and therefore want the same for their kids. But which is better: private schools or public schools? While there are many advantages and disadvantages in each (nothing is going to be absolutely perfect), we are going to focus on the benefits of an education in the public school system, or in other words, schools funded by the government that are for anyone to attend. An accurate definition found in the Encyclopedia of American Education (1996) states: “Any elementary or secondary school under control of elected or appointed civil authority, supported entirely by public tax monies, and, with few exceptions, open to all students in a designated district, free of any tuition charges.” (780) These include elementary, secondary schools and vocational schools. Public schools are a good choice in education because they provide a wide variety of subjects to study, are diverse in their student body, available to everyone, yet can sometimes be misunderstood.
There are many decisions for parents to choose private or public school for their kids. Every parent wants what is best for his or her child. A person's education is one of the most important aspects in determining whether or not they will become a productive member of society. Education is so important. We need to look at both public and private schools to find out if there is a difference. Private schools are a better choice than public school for many reasons. Private encourages strong quality teaching, encourages higher education learning, and inhibit the rampant of bullying.