Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of religion in society
Role of religion in society
Role of religion in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of religion in society
The aggressive competitive nature of the United States economy has caused poverty for many, while creating hostile crime-driven environments that result in an increased gap between the rich and the poor. The current state of the U. S. economy has caused an outcry of criticisms and alternatives. U. S. citizens jointly agree that the economic system in the U. S. has failed the mass majority of its citizens (Bruner, 2012). Economists agree inequality has grown immensely, but differ sharply over government action (Bruner, 2011). The hardest challenge faced when trying to reform economic structure drastically is that almost everyone has vested interests in the current economy. Most Americans’ outlook on the future has become quite dim in the recent years; people feel isolated and alone, deprived of community and the vital resources necessary to live a fulfilling life (Fleischauer, 2006). The future of the U. S. economy may seem bleak; however, the purpose of this paper is to propose a lighter future. A future filled with an overwhelming sense of individual importance, community support, and sustainable living. This future is achieved through implementing aspects of gift economics into society. Doing what one loves and sharing the result of that labor of love with one’s neighbor is the foundation of which a gift economy is built upon. Implementing a gift economy would be a way to unite and strengthen communities, along with establishing “social mechanisms” of accountability and responsibility.
Community
In today’s world if an individual is entirely financially independent, there is no need for that individual to know their neighbors. That person can go day to day requiring any goods or services they please via mo...
... middle of paper ...
...on. Investipodeia. Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/
Lapavitsas, C. (2004). Commodities and gifts: Why commodities represent more than market relations. Science & Society, 68(1), 33-56.
Leahy, T. (2013). The perils of consumption and the gift economy. Retrieved from http://www.freebay.net/site/content/view/1243/33/
Miller, D. (2012). Consumption and its consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nelson, A., & Tinnerman, F. (2011). Contact and converge. In A. Nelson & F. Tinnerman (Eds.), Life without money: Building fair and sustainable economies. (p.213-234). London: Pluto Press
Pomme van Hoof’s Video Blog #3 (2005) [Video file]. Retreived from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4lzwR4e8Vg
Richter, W. (2010). Combatting corruption, encouraging ethics: A practical guide to management ethics. (pp.110-225) (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Press.
America was once known as the land of opportunity. However, that is no longer the case. Americans are still suffering from a depression that began three years ago in 2008. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2007, the United States unemployment rates were 4.6 percent. In 2009, one year after the depression began, the unemployment rate rose to 7.6 percent. Millions of Americans are living in poverty, unable to afford the basic necessities. On the other hand, there is a minuscule percent of the population that are billionaires. Written in 2005, Holly Sklar’s essay “The Growing Gulf Between the Rich and the Rest of Us” argues that if something isn’t done about the growing inequality between the rich and the poor, the American economy as a whole will weaken. A year later, the Economist published the article, “Inequality and the American Dream” implies that the American dream is broken. Sklar’s argument sheds light on the Economist’s argument. In particular, Sklar’s use of facts regarding the wealthiest Americans, the poorest Americans, and the discussion of the impact of inequality on society provide insight into the Economist’s article.
Romal, Jane B., and Hibschweiler, Arlene M. "Improving Professionals Ethics: Steps for Implementing Change." The CPA Journal (2004). Retrieved on 16 September 2006 .
As stated by Franklin D. Roosevelt, “the test of our progression is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.” Many people may agree with this statement considering that the United States is such a wealthy country and in 2012, 46.5 million people were living in poverty in the United States and 15% of all Americans and 21.8% of children under age eighteen were in poverty.The honest truth is that many people do not know the conditions this group of people must live in on a daily basis because of the small number of people who realize the struggle there is not a great amount of service. In the article Too stressed for Success, the author Kevin Clarke asks the question “What is the cost of being poor in America?” and follows the question by explaining the great deals of problems the community of poverty goes through daily by saying, “Researchers have long known that because of a broad reduction in retail and other consumer choices experienced by America's poor, it is often simply more expensive to be poor in the United States.
Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2011). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. New York: John Wiley.
Hurst introduced the idea of a commodity in the text readings. By definition, a commodity is something that is of use, advantage, or value. More directly, Hurst showed how people by use of their skills, looks, or names, could be used as advantages in society. He uses the examples of celebrities, sports figures, and beautiful people to show that people can be commodities. All of these groups bring some sort of recognition or attraction that is beneficial to a company, firm, or individual. In return, they receive compensation for their name recognition to society. (Hurst 99-115)
...ment and the people, more Americans can see the equality promised them: equality of opportunity. Only through community, meaning effort from both citizens and government, can inequality be resolved. No one-sided approach can rectify a situation that envelops all of society. Government must set aside partisanship in order to produce targeted legislation that addresses the declining transportation, education, and economic infrastructure. Meanwhile, the community must realign their ideals and realize that together these problems can be solved. However, as long as materialism and overt individualism dominate the community and dysfunction and gridlock have a foothold in government, the schism between rich and poor will continue to grow. The two sides will “live increasingly separate lives” (Sandel), and the goal of economic equality slips father and farther from repair.
The wealth inequality debate should focus on what public policies will aid the accumulation of wealth by more, not fewer, American families. The first step American’s need to make toward transforming our consumer culture is to understand it better.
Smith, Noah. “How to Fix America's Wealth Inequality: Teach Americans to Be Cheap.” The Atlantic. Atlantic Pub., 12 March 2013. Web. 06 April 2014. .
Trevino, L., & Nelson, K. (2011). Managing business ethics - straight talk about how to
As the old saying goes, money is power. As the statistics show, some people have an insane amount of money, yet their fellow countrymen have close to nothing. In a struggling economy, unfair distribution of wealth can create real problems and unimaginable hardships for some people. For example, millions of people pay $2 for a bottle of designer water, while millions more live on less than $2 a day. If this is to one day change, wealthy people must adopt a much more magnanimous conviction towards their money.
Seawell, Buie 2010, ‘The Content and Practice of Business Ethics’, Good Business, pp. 2-18, viewed 22 October 2013, .
Growing up, I was fortunate to live a fairly comfortable life. My parents were both college educated and had well-paying jobs at Boeing in St. Louis. My three siblings and I lived in a good neighborhood in one of the top school districts in the state, and we had everything we needed: three meals every day, all our supplies for school, and the ability to participate in sports and other extra-curricular activities throughout the year. Living in that neighborhood, however, did skew my view of how the world worked. While I understood that there were some people who were homeless and struggled just to get one meal each day, I didn’t comprehend the sheer amount of people, just in St. Louis alone, who fell into that category.
Lynn Harsh (Nov. 2002). ‘Capitalism – A Deal with the Devil?’. Retrieved on Mar. 23 from:
With all this talk on economic inequality between people, looking at the history, current, trends and the predictions of the future, it is seen that basically everything that surrounds economic inequality is of some form of negativity. It can also be seen that something such as this was inevitable. The only way to go through it is by finding measures to curb the negative predictions of the future. I end here with a quote from Thomas Frank ‘’Massive inequality, we have learned, isn't the best way to run an economy after all. And when you think about it, it's also profoundly ugly’’.
Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2007). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right Fourth ed., Retrieved on July 30, 2010 from www.ecampus.phoenix.edu