Introduction
This paper examines certain key financial ratios for three companies’ which operate in the market of gold. Presented are analyses and comparisons of the companies for the three most recent years, 2004, 2005, 2006. The focal point of the original analysis was Royal Gold. Two other strong companies in the gold market are Newmont Mining and Barrick Gold Corporation.
Royal Gold, Inc. is a Denver, Colorado based company. It is primarily in the business of buying and selling gold royalties. Newmont Mining is also a Denver, Colorado company. Newmont is one of the world’s leading gold mining companies. Barrick Gold is headquartered in Toronto, Canada but is traded on both the Canadian stock exchange and the New York stock exchange. Barrick’s strategy is exploration and operating of gold and copper mines and a pipeline operation.
Royal Gold differs from Barrick and Newmont because Royal Gold does not operate and finance actual mining operations. Barrick and Newmont were selected because it is the quantity mined and the price of gold that unites them.
PE Ratio
PE Ratio
2006 2005 2004
Royal Gold Inc 34 62 34
Newmont Mining Corp 25 67 47
Barrick Gold Corp 17 35 40
The following is a visual graph of the data above.
The first financial ratio of the analysis is the Price to Earnings ratio (“P/E ratio”). The ratio is computed by dividing the price of one share of common stock, by the earnings per share of common stock. This analysis uses diluted earnings per share which assumes the issuance of new stock for all existing stock options. Also, the price of the stock was computed as an average of the fourth quarter high and low stock prices published in the 10K report of each company, because the year end stock prices were not listed for all the companies. Because the P/E ratio measures the relative costliness of different stocks, in relation to their income, it provides a useful place to begin the analysis.
A comparison of the PE Ratio for these three companies shows a great deal about how investors view Royal Gold Inc. in comparison to competitors in the industry. All three companies have had ups and downs over the past three years yet Royal Gold has remained fairly solid. The prospect of strong growth appears to nearly double the PE Ratio from 2004 to 2005 for Royal Gold and Newmont Mining Corp.
The stock price is currently 103.31, down from a recent high of 121.50. The P/E ratio is declining at 28 and beta at .67, which is expected to grow closer to 1.0. A recent earnings surprise last December yielded a 15% difference from the lower expectations and the latest earnings reports late last month also surprised investors. Estimates for the 2000 fiscal year are being raised by a large majority of analyst who believe that earnings per share will increase and the stock price will reach close to 150.
The first method we will review is the accounting method. Through this accounting approach we will analyze specific ratios and their possible impact on the company's performance. The specific ratios we will review include the return on total assets, return on equity, gross profit margin, earnings per share, price earnings ratio, debt to assets, debt to equity, accounts receivable turnover, total asset turnover, fixed asset turnover, and average collection period. I will explain each ratio in greater detail, and why I have included it in this analysis, when I give the results of each specific ratio calculation.
This analysis will identify the current value of the company at a stand-alone value and explain why Nestle Food would want to buy this company and the synergies involved for their reasoning. We will also discuss who will benefit if Reynolds Metals were to sell to Nestle or were to create an IPO. Finally we will provide a recommendation for Reynolds Metals that will be most beneficial to the company financial needs.
The main communication problem Barrick Gold is facing is the fact that the company didn’t go according to plan, and didn’t stick to the promises they made. When a company like Barrick is faced with such accusations, the companies name becomes distorted as for its reputation. This caused legal disputes against the company.
This report will critically review the capital structure of the Royal Mail (RM) and the implications this has for the company with reference to its apparent value and the return required by equity investors. The report will take data from the latest set of accounts published by the RM and it accompanying investor reports. It will also refer to investors analysis and news item in an attempt to gain a qualitative impression of RM’s share value.. The numerical analysis will not use information that relates to time past the last full accounting period, however the conclusion will attempt reconcile any share price movement with the analysis. The report will assess three models for their suitability in analysing the capital structure of the RM, (Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the dividend valuation model).
Firstly, based on the profitability, P&G has earned higher profit from each dollar of revenue which is 13.4% compared to C-P 12.9% for the recent year 2013. In addition, P&G also has higher EPS of US$4.04 compare to C-P US$2.41. In contrast, C-P register a Gross Profit of 58.7% and Return on Equity of 91.0% as opposed to P&G’s 49.6% and 17.0% respectively. C-P seems to rely heavily on debt and this has helped to improve the Return of Equity. P&G also has its downside in asset turnover ratio (0.62) and fixed turnover
The ratio of 1.7 for the last two years indicates consistency, although a lower number is preferred. As a company produces high value product, this could be a satisfactory ratio. By comparing it to 2011 when a ratio was 2.9, in the last two years a ratio improved
Not since the late 1970s has gold been so popular. For many years, gold was an afterthought. No one wanted to deal with it. It's heavy, hard to store safely (especially in any kind of volume), and it's expensive to ship. It lacks convenience, liquidity, and the market can be confusing.
Ratio analysis are useful tools when judging the performance of a company by weighing and evaluating the operating performance (Block-Hirt). There are 13 significant ratios that can separate by four main categories, profitability, asset utilization, liquidity and debt utilization ratios. The ratio analysis covered here consists of eight various ratios with at least one from each of these main categories. These ratios were used to compare and contrast the performance of Verizon versus AT& T over the years 2005 and 2006.
The article Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy was written in 1968 by Edward I. Altman. The purpose of the article is to address the quality of ratio analysis as an analytical technique. At the time, some academicians were moving away from ratio analysis and moving toward statistical analysis. The article attempted to determine if ratio analysis should be continued, eliminated and replaced by statistical analysis or serve together with statistical analysis as cofactors in financial analysis. The example case used in the article was the prediction of corporate bankruptcy.
The companies I have selected for this assignment is Malaysia Steel Works (KL) Bhd (5098) and Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. (7153), both of the company is from industrial products sector and its share is traded in main market.
The final model used to compute the cost of capital was the earning capitalization model. The problem with this model is that it does not take into consideration the growth of the company. Therefore we chose to reject this calculation. The earnings capitalization model calculations were found this way:
When buying gold, there are things that need to be taken into consideration. The purpose of buying gold will determine the kind of gold that is bought. One gold expert advised buying contemporary gold bullion coins if the purpose is prize movement capitalization or hedging financial uncertainties. Pre-1933 gold coins are good...
Any successful business owner or investor is constantly evaluating the performance of the companies they are involved with, comparing historical figures with its industry competitors, and even with successful businesses from other industries. To complete a thorough examination of any company's effectiveness, however, more needs to be looked at than the easily attainable numbers like sales, profits, and total assets. Luckily, there are many well-tested ratios out there that make the task a bit less daunting. Financial ratio analysis helps identify and quantify a company's strengths and weaknesses, evaluate its financial position, and shows potential risks. As with any other form of analysis, financial ratios aren't definitive and their results shouldn't be viewed as the only possibilities. However, when used in conjuncture with various other business evaluation processes, financial ratios are invaluable. By examining Ford Motor Company's financial ratios, along with a few other company factors, this report will give a clear picture of how the company is doing now and should do in the future.