Roman and Spartan Warriors

1280 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ancient greek and roman military

Introduction
Ancient Greece, Sparta especially, and Ancient Rome were best known for their military tactics and strategies. In the Greek city-state Sparta, military went as far as making every male citizen a hoplite, warriors of Ancient Greece, and go through a mandatory training program, agoge, or put through public humiliation (Park and Love). It is impossible to say that both Rome and Sparta neglected the idea of implementing warfare into their daily lives.
Ancient Sparta was the head of the Greek military, at one point the only Greek military. Genius tactics at the time led Sparta to become famous throughout the Mediterranean region as the strongest military force. The hoplites were known for their round shield and carried long spears with short swords (Sidebottom). During times of war, a military formation known as the phalanx, in which was essentially warriors standing in a box formation supporting one another, was used to essentially “push” the other side, striking down the other side by either being trampled or stabbed by the short swords of the opposing side. This basic formation was the very heart and soul of Greek warfare.
Rome, on the other hand, was improving upon their military as well. Rome’s military was not as original, as they used the same formation of the phalanx at one point in time and even modified tactics used by their enemies; eventually though, Rome developed new tactics and different fighters, including cavalry or alae (Watson). The Roman military system was basically tripartite, or in a three-part system with each part focused on a specific area or spread out amongst the empire (Watson). This military system helped lead Rome to eventually become the largest empire the world had not previ...

... middle of paper ...

...nt Warfare: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, GBR. Ebook. 21 Nov. 2013
Rice, Rob S. Ancient Roman Warfare. Gareth Stevens, 2009. Web. 11 May. 2014
Sidebottom, Harry. Ancient Warfare: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, GBR. Ebook. 21 Nov. 2013
Sidnell, Phillib. Warhorse: Cavalry in Ancient Warfare. London: Hambledon Continuum, Ebook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 10 Dec. 2013
Tucci, Jim. “Warfare in the Ancient World” The Journal of Military History. 74.3 (2010): 879-99. Proquest. Web. 22 Nov. 2013
Warnock, Michael T., Jr. “The American Hoplite: Evolution of the Infrantryman” Infantry 97.6 (2008): 43-6. Proquest. Web. 22 Nov. 2013
Watson, George Ronald. The Roman Soldier. Cornell University Press, 1985. Web. 1 Apr. 2014
W.G. Runciman. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. Vol. 4. No. 4 (Dec. 1998) p. 731-751 Great Britain and Ireland. 3 Nov. 2013

Show More
Related

  • Dbq Compare And Contrast Sparta And Athens

    585 Words  | 2 Pages

    “reach them to endure pain and conquer in battle.” (Document 11). Sparta was especially known for their strong army force. From age seven, all boys were trained not to express their pain and become great soldiers on the battlefield. Unlike Sparta, Athens’ main focus was not on the military. “For we are lovers of beauty, yet with no extravagance and lovers of wisdom, yet without weakness.” (Document 9). Athens was essentially based upon the arts and intelligence. Instead of boys going through years and years of military training, Athenians learned subjects like literature, art, and arithmetic.

    Read More

  • Augustus Military Power Essay

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    During his reign, Augustus made a number of changes how the Roman military operated. As Rome shifted from a Republic to Empire and the ideas of what Rome was to be was carefully being crafted by Augustus to fit his own narrative, the army went through a number of changes to support the new dynamic of Empire and Emperor. These changes to the army allowed the army to grow to fit its new role, and helped Rome to become a true military power.

    Read More

  • Roman and Greek Military

    747 Words  | 2 Pages

    Greeks and Romans are famous for the strategy's that they used. The Greeks main strategy was called the Phanlax. They basically have a rectangle of troops and each on...

    Read More

  • Roman Legions Dbq

    136 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rome had many great generals over its years, because of this they had great tactics that allowed them to

    Read More

  • Rome and America

    645 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rome could not have succeeded without the personal freedom and individuality granted to its citizens. This nurtured a creative and inventive mind, which would not be hindered by the limitations of oppressive monarchies. People lived for their own greater good more than the government, as in America. America and Rome both produced technologies that made their economies dominate over their neighbors, appreciating the value of their currencies. A strong sense of peace and order helped each country thrive, as the fear of trading and making money dissipated. The Roman military was the most advanced of its day. Soldiers were more equipped and armed than any other army, and the best methods of siege craft were employed in battle. The American military shares the sam...

    Read More

  • Gaius Marius Research Paper

    1251 Words  | 3 Pages

    When we think of the great empires of the past, the one that probably influenced western culture the most, would have to be the Roman Empire. It was so large that at the height of it’s power, the Roman Empire encompassed all of the Mediterranean sea going as far north as Britain, and as far east as ancient Babylon. Many different people groups and cultures were affected by the Roman Empire. They built many great wonders, many roads to connect the empire, and achieved many great feats through the might of their Empire. All of these things were possible because of one reason, the Roman military was the most dominant, cohesive, brilliant fighting force the world had ever seen. The Roman army made every great accomplishment of the empire possible. But there was a time when the Roman Republic was not powerful at all. It’s military reflected that, it was a mere collection of land holders that would fight only when needed. There was no professional force to speak of. But as time progresses and the Roman Republic evolved, so too did her military. And this transformation was due to one man, Gaius Marius. Gaius took the Roman Army and radically changed every aspect of them. He created a full time, professional army of disciplined men. And organized them into the famous legions. Without the reforms of Gaius Marius, the great Roman Empire that we all know and have studied, never would have existed.

    Read More

  • The Roman Military

    463 Words  | 1 Pages

    The strength of the Roman military was the string that held the Roman Empire together for as long as it lasted. The military was made up of strictly disciplined men whom were ready and willing to serve their emperor.

    Read More

  • The Roman Empire and Risk

    1097 Words  | 3 Pages

    Simkin, John. “ Military Tactics of the Roman Army.” spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk. Spartacus Educational, Sept. 1997- June 2013. Web. 9 Nov. 2013.

    Read More

  • The Roman Army And The Development Of The Great Roman Empire

    654 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the prominent reasons for this great empire was the army. The Roman army was overly effective, organized, respected and professional. The army knew how to conquer and evolve as they grew. The major pillar to the development of the Roman Empire was its military might. The Roman military is thought to be the most successful and powerful military in human history. Fiero (2013) stated, “Rome’s highly disciplined army was the backbone of the Empire”. The Roman army was extremely organized and knew how to adapt. The army had endurance to defend against invasions from their enemies and to expand the empire throughout the Western world. The army was disciplined and originally all citizens, who served terms of two years. As the scope of Roman expansion shifted and the need for a larger force increased, most devoted twenty five years or more to the army. Military service was also a tool used to incorporate conquered societies into Roman life and culture.

    Read More

  • Rise of the Roman Republic

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many political, economic, sociological causes to the growth and expansion of the Roman republic and later the Roman Empire, but one major factor of expansion that the Romans are most famous for is there Army. There Army was famous for their harsh discipline amongst their own ranks and there mercifulness brutality amongst their enemies. According to our text Roman warfare was characterized by great ferocity and the Roman pursuit of victory was relentless. The Romans had a pragmatic view towards atrocity and massacre that viewed almost any act as justifiable if it eased the path of victory (Goldsworthy 2000) p. 24. The hoplite phalanx which originated by the Greeks and later adopted by the Roman army, demanded great discipline and adherence to orders in order for this group of soldiers...

    Read More

  • The Rise of Rome

    597 Words  | 2 Pages

    The military might of Rome was second to none in its prime. Victorious battle after battle did nothing but increase Rome’s population of young men suited for combat, increase Rome’s borders, and increase Rome’s influence over its people and the surrounding people. With such great generals as Alexander the Great, Pompey the Great, and Julius Caesar Rome won many decisive battles. At its largest times, Rome controlled most of the Middle East, Asia Minor, present day Europe, and Egypt. It’s is hard to state that conquering and controlling all of the surrounding territory didn’t help aid in Rome’s great success. But would they have been so successful militarily if they didn’t have the trade routes or the technology?

    Read More

  • Acquisitive Vs. Satisfied Powers

    1014 Words  | 3 Pages

    Greek warfare centered on the hoplite, a fairly heavy infantryman, whose main tactic was the phalanx. The hoplite was very effective in flat, open terrain, and they were generally reinforced by fewer types of support troops. The hoplite was armed with a spear and heavy armor. The phalanx was a tightly packed group of hoplites forming a shield wall. Their best (and pretty much only) tactic was to bash the enemy shield wall with their own shields, while the men at the front stabbed over and under with their spears. The downside was that the movements were predictable and the hoplite had little versatility in rough terrain. The hoplite had little use outside of the phalanx as their heavy armor limited movement and visibility. This limited their command options, tactics and

    Read More

  • Exploring the Notoriety of the Roman Army

    1608 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Roman army was known for its discipline, organization, and innovation, which allowed Rome to build an empire that would dominate the Mediterranean world. Also known for its longevity of survival, the Roman army was one of the most effective fighting forces in military history. Greek biographer Plutarch credits the founder of Rome, Romulus, with creating legionary forces that fought in a form of a militia, with recruitment dependent on a citizen’s social standing. Rome had six classes of wealth upon Rome’s citizens; the lowest group had no land and were excluded from the military, while the highest group, the equites, formed the cavalry.

    Read More

  • Difference Between Greek and Roman Warfare

    410 Words  | 1 Pages

    The main difference between Greek and Roman warfare was the formations that they fought in. The Grecian armies all used the phalanx as a fighting formation while the Romans used the maniple. The phalanx was one mass formation that consisted of infantry eight deep. The maniple formation was actually a group of formations in a checkerboard pattern. Each maniple consisted of about 120 men and when employed in Italy, the Romans used thirty maniples. The maniple proved to be a better formation, because the phalanx left no room for maneuvering after engagement.

    Read More

  • Greek Golden Age Essay

    1034 Words  | 3 Pages

    Because of the tranquil times, the civilization’s society had more time to focus on writing, math, astronomy, and artistic fields, as well as trade and metallurgy. Out of all the city-states of Greece, two excelled over all the rest, Sparta and Athens. Even though they were the most advanced and strong civilizations, they were bitter enemies. While Athens focused mainly on the people’s democracy and citizen rights, Sparta were ferocious and enslaved its original inhabitants, making them unable to leave and kept under a close eye to prevent insurgence (History of Greece:The Golden Age of Greece). Additionally, Sparta had strict and trained soldiers that underwent intense physical exercising and instruction.

    Read More

More about Roman and Spartan Warriors

Open Document