In the past, there have been several studies about eye-gaze patterns in turn-taking. One of these studies is that of Vertegaal et al (2001), which was to verify if eye gaze could predict to whom conversational partners are speaking or listening to in a multi-user environment. By multi-user environments the experimenters mean a conversation with three or more actors involved. In their introduction Vertegaal et al (2001) present several different predictions about the research. In their first hypothesis they argue that “significantly more time is spent gazing at the individual one listens or speaks to, than at others” (p.302). But to prevent the bias of participants also looking at other conversational partners, they added the second hypothesis …show more content…
(1968). The Effects of Visibility on Interaction in a Dyad. Human Relations, 21, 3-17.
Argyle, M. and Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and Mutual Gaze. London: Cambridge University Press.
Beattie, G. (1980.). The role of language production processes in the organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction. In B. Butterworth (Ed.) Language Production, 1, 69-107.
Chapple, E.D. (1939). Quantitative analysis of the interaction of individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 25, 58–67.
Cline, M.G. (1967). The perception of where a person is looking. American Journal of Psychology, 80, 41-50.
Duncan, S. Jr, Fiske, DW (1977). Face-to-Face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory (Wiley, New York).
Foulsham, T., & Sanderson, L. A. (2013). Look who's talking? Sound changes gaze behaviour in a dynamic social scene. Visual Cognition, 21(7), 922-944.
Goffman, E (1964). Behavior in public places. Glencoe, 111: The Free Press.
Hirvenkari, L., Ruusuvuori, J., Saarinen, V. M., Kivioja, M., Peräkylä, A., & Hari, R. (2013). Influence of Turn-Taking in a Two-Person Conversation on the Gaze of a Viewer. PloS one, 8(8), e71569.
Isaacs, E. and Tang, J. (1993) What video can and can’t do for collaboration: a case study. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia ’93. Anaheim, CA:
…show more content…
(1998). Grondslagen van interculturele communicatie. Studieveld en werkterrein. Houten/Diegem: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587-10592.
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587-10592.
Ten Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2004). Durational aspects of turn-taking in spontaneous face-to-face and telephone dialogues. In Text, speech and dialogue, 563- 570.
Vertegaal, R. Van der Veer, G.C., and Vons, H. (2000). Effects of Gaze on Multiparty Mediated Communication. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface. Montreal, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 95-102.
Vertegaal, R., Slagter, R., van der Veer, G., & Nijholt, A. (2001). Eye gaze patterns in conversations: there is more to conversational agents than meets the eyes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems,
Although many see it as a disadvantage, cross hand-eye dominance may also be advantageous in the sports realm. As described above, cross dominance has been proved to increase success in certain sports like baseball and basketball. There have been multiple experiments that have tested the effects of cross hand-eye dominance on the percentage of free throws a person can make. Most people have hypothesized that the people who are cross hand-eye dominant have a greater chance of making their free throws. This is because when you shoot a free throw people usually shoot at face level which may block the eye on the same side of the shooting hand. Now if you are cross hand-eye dominant, you would not face this problem because the side of your body
Though the term “inattentional blindness” would not be conceived until 1998, the concept itself is not new. As cited by Simons and Chabris, Hungarian neurologist and psychiatrist Rezso Balint wrote in 1907 “It is a well-known phenomenon that we do not notice anything happening in our surroundings while being absorbed in the inspection of something…” (1999). Using the term “selective looking,” Ulric Neisser, an American psychologist, demonstrated this idea in 1979. In his study, he instructed subjects to count the number of times a group of participants threw a basketball to each other. While the subjects were focused on this attention demanding task, a woman with an umbrella walked in the middle of the participants. At th...
The man is chained to the desk, and a beaming light pierces his robin egg-colored eyes. The next thing he hears are muffled voices. The voices now become more clear, and then the first words become comprehensible,”We caught you”. The man then hangs his head in mortification. He was a world class criminal, and had never been snagged before, until now. He has no idea how they captured him. He had hacked into the police department's network and checked on their painfully slow, monotonous progression of their investigation into his previous offenses. Then he remembers the story he heard flash on to the news, “Police Department need to hire more Shrinks to help Reduce Crime.” He then had that moment that in the movies, lightbulb magically appears
Shapiro, F. (2001). Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures (2nd ed.). New York, New York: Guilford Press.
[18] Tranel, D., Damasio, A.R., 1985. Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science 228, 1453–1454.
Is the male gaze still a relevant concept? Using historical and contemporary visual examples, assess whether the male gaze still exists.
People want full attention and full eye contact, to ensure interest in the topic being discussed. I discovered that when I would talk to someone with my back completely turned to someone was when they were offended the most, rather than when I just didn’t make eye contact but was faced in their general vicinity. I think that most people reacted negatively towards this experiment because of the social norm that involves being polite and attentive towards a stranger. Being rude to someone whom I’ve never met before for no reason broke the common social norms of politeness. From this experiment I learned that it is greatly important to make eye contact with someone during any type of conversation. If not, it is seen as very rude and will result in negative reactions or attitudes, and give the impression to whomever I am engaging in conversation that I am not interested in what they are saying to
Muller, N. G., Bartelt, O. A., Donner, T. H., Villringer, A. & Brandt, S. A. (2003). A physiological correlate of the “zoom lens” of visual attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(9): 3561-3565.
His attention skills do affect his use of eye-contact, in that if he is not attending to what is being said he will not look at the adult.
Eye gaze is essential for evaluating the following objects: liking and attraction, attentiveness, competence, social skills and mental health, credibility, and dominance (Kleinke, 1986), these evaluations provide information about the target of another person’s attention and expression. Therefore, eye gaze helps to obtain information about communicative intentions and future behaviour (Baron-Cohen, 1995). Moreover, according to Patterson’s distinguish between communicative behaviours and indicative behaviours in 1982, only communicative behaviours are driven by a goal or purpose. Thus when infants are using eye gaze for communication, they are subjective to process the information transition. This statement also be demonstrated by many studies. For instance, D 'Entremont and his colleagues tested 24 infants form 3- to 6-month-olds in 1997 and they found that 73% participants followed the adults’ head-turn behaviour to change the direction of their eye
Eye contact can determine a person’s attitude and true feelings. People use eye contact in social situations to determine how and what a person is truly feeling. The amount of distance a person is from another along with the amount of eye contact used, can change the attraction level between two individual. This attraction can change the attitude of both parties towards each other (Goldman, 1980).
Surprise! Eye contact is a sign that you happen to be a great listener! Now what has the eye got to do with listening? When you keep eye contact with the person you are talking to it indicates that you are focused and paying attention. It means that you are actually listening to what the person has to say. That is where the saying "Don't just listen with your ears" comes from. So "listen" more than talk, everyone loves a good listener especially the opposite gender!
Looking people in the eyes is a type of nonverbal communication. When I used to speak to someone, I would never look them in the eyes, I thought it was very awkward and I didn’t like to do it. I did this for the first 11 years of my life. I
I learned a lot about Human Communication in this class when I read the chapter about Nonverbal Communication. Nonverbal Communication is the process of using messages that are not words to generate meaning. I learned that it happens every day. I also learned that is very hard to read or understand depending on the person you are speaking to or with. Verbal and Nonverbal codes work in conjunction with each other. The words we speak or say are used in conjunction six different ways: to repeat, to emphasize, to complement, to contradict, to substitute, and to regulate. I never knew until reading this chapter that we do these things all most every time we communicate. These are things I took for granted until now. I now know that I will pay
...tention to how people react to one another’s comments, guessing the relationship between the people and guessing how each feels about what is being said. This can inform individuals to better understand the use of body language when conversing with other people. It is also important to take into account individual differences. Different cultures use different non-verbal gestures. Frequently, when observing these gestures alone the observer can get the wrong impression, for instance, the listener can subconsciously cross their arms. This does not mean that they are bored or annoyed with the speaker; it can be a gesture that they are comfortable with. Viewing gestures as a whole will prevent these misunderstandings. Non-verbal gestures are not only physical, for example; the tone of voice addressing a child will be different from the way it is addressed to an adult.