Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
NATIONAL IDENTITY AND ITS ELEMENTS
NATIONAL IDENTITY AND ITS ELEMENTS
NATIONAL IDENTITY AND ITS ELEMENTS
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: NATIONAL IDENTITY AND ITS ELEMENTS
Questions and Answers:
(2) How does a brand name or country of origin work as a heuristic?
(3) Do ratings change as a function of the country of origin?
(4) Are there any significant differences or similarities between domestic versus foreign brands for EACH fashion product (eg. A Chinese luxury brand versus an Australian luxury brand)?
(5) What are the implications for companies and businesses that use country of origin as a way of advertising / promoting their product and brands?
a) Based on the results in question 4a,
(2) How does a brand name or country of origin work as a heuristic(2 marks)?
Heuristic or rules of thumb are general decision making strategies people use that are based on little information, yet very often correct; heuristics are mental shortcuts that reduce the cognitive burden associated with decision making (Shah & Oppenheimer, 2008). In this case, consumers always see an Italian product with the exemplar of luxury brand. Thus, they may assume all Italian based product is always expensive, exclusive, unique, high price and comfortable. Meanwhile, consumer may also assume that all products from China were all low quality, cheap and not long lasting based on what they heard and see on the television or friends.
(3) Do ratings change as a function of the country of origin? Explain why or why not. (4 marks)
Yes. It is because the perceived theoretical relationship between the cue of country of origin and the attributes of a product is largely conducted by product-country images, among which quality as a representative of a country’s production has an important effect on consumers’ evaluations of products (Broniarczyk & Alba, 1994). For example, Korean music has been famous worldw...
... middle of paper ...
... Decision Outcomes”. Student Pulse.http://www.studentpulse.com/articles/180/2/decision-making-factors-that-influence-decision-making-heuristics-used-and-decision-outcomes
Klein, Jill Gabrielle, Richard Ettenson and Marlene D. Morris (1998). "The Animosity Model of Foreign Product Purchase: An Empirical Test in the People's Republic of China", Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89-100
Shah, A.K., & Oppenheimer, D.M. (2008).Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207-222. DOI: 1.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207.
Shimp, Terence A. and Subhash Sharma (1987), "Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE", Journal of Marketing Research 24(3), 280-289
Tversky, Amos and David Kahneman. 1974. “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”. Science 185: 1124-1131. http://turtletrader.com/heuristics.pdf
Characteristics of our society reflect in the outcome of purchasing tendencies. How many of us can honestly say we make a valid effort to purchase goods made in our own country? In our face paced world where both parents are in the work force, raising children, social activities and everything else, who has time to make an effort? Most often, consumers only care about marking off the s...
Decision making theories and models largely derive from the fields of psychology and economics. The Lens Model (Brunswik, 1952) was a conceptual design, sparking a plethora of literature outlining subsequent models and theories on judgements and decision making. Brunswik set out that an individual uses fallible ‘cues’ from their environment while trying to be as empirically accurate as possible in making judgements. Hammond (1967), an architect of modern decision making theory built on this conceptual model with his Cognitive Continuum Theory (CCT), which looks at the combination of an individual’s cognitive ability and their use of situational ‘cues’ when making a decision (Hammond et al, 1967; & Hammond, 2000). CCT works on the notion that decision making is based on a certain systematic process: the analysis
His first book Attention and Effort was published in 1973, in which he focused his study on attention, which was seen as an irrelevant topic of choice to work on during Titchener’s time (Kahneman, 1973). However, Dr. Daniel Kahneman concerned himself with the concept of attention since it may be or is one of the foundations that take part in hesitation within decision making, including the different subsets attention has when it comes to our mental processes. In Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982), the book looks at judgment and the attributions of behavior through predicting the possibilitie(s) of choices. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology was published in 1999, which mainly concentrates on the scientific effort to comprehend the concept of human pain and pleasure; one of Kahneman’s most well known works in social psychology. Then in 2000, he and along with colleagues published Choices, Values, and Frames, as they discussed their alternative of prospect theory and elaborates on the approaches towards the efficacy of choices people make. The fifth book, Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, was released in 2002 to try and help answer subjective questions of complex situation of the world/life through an objective perspective. Lastly, Kahneman’s most recent work was issued in 2011, Thinking, Fast and
Price, H. R., et al, (1982). Principles in Psychology. New York : Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
The most dominant of the heuristics present is representativeness. Representativeness occurs when someone relates a present event to a similar event in our human database or memory. The result is that the decision involving the future event is based on the outcome of the past event.
Chandrasen & Paliwoda (2010) divided into three subcontracts i) country of manufacture product specific image ii) country of manufactures overall image iii) country of brand overall image. According to Chandrasen & Paliwoda (2010) with the passage of time both brand and country images changed and so was the perceived trait of products related with a country also changed. The most important factor which influences COO concept was globalization. As the global economy expanded and reached geographic borders and number of alliances increased, the world has become a more allied and co-dependent place. Although there were many disagreements about impact of globalization, it cannot be ignored. Various past remote countries suddenly uncovered to the World economy, and their population start shaping mind-set about international brands and their COO.
Assuming a country had a favorable political, legal and economic environment; its cultural environment was evaluated. Culture impacts demand and the marketing mix; therefore, if a country's culture was deemed unfavorable, it was not included in the top ten ranking. Similarly, if a country's culture seemed especially favorable, that aspect is denoted later in the analysis. Cultural factors considered in this analysis:
Schiffman, L., O’Cass, A., Paladino, A., D’Alessandro, S. & Bednall, D. (2011). Consumer behaviour. (5th ed). Australia: Pearson.
Porter (1998) perspectives demand conditions regarding the extent of the home market and advanced and demanding buyers. That is, if the measure of home demand is huge, firms will contribute to harvest economies of scale. In nations where the local buyers (either modern buyers or consumers) are the world’s most refined and demanding, organizations are compelled to meet exclusive expectations, to redesign, and to react to intense difficulties. Porter (1998) sees a wide mixture of explanations behind strangely demanding needs: social norms, distribution channels, and national passions. To make the determinant clearer Korean consumers are infamous for being demanding. As one director of a multinational organization working in Korea once admitted. "Once we can fulfill Korean consumers, then we are certain of our achievement in different nations, as well" (Kim, personal communication, August 13, 2000). Korean fashion consumers are additionally greatly demanding. Because of their Confucian legacy, they are delicate about their appearance. They accept they lose face in the event that they are not legitimately wearing an open setting. This conviction can clarify their higher propensity to fashion cognizance and brand dependability (Jin and Koh, 1999). Also, the high import rates of prestigious global fashion brands (The US Commercial Service,
On the otherhand, South Korea is on the fit in stage which means they use and consume luxury brands to show their status, wealth to the other people in their environment. Japan is in the fifhth stage of “ The spread of Luxury Model” which is named as a “a way of life”. (Chadha and Husband 2006: 46). Therefore, Japanese people have high expectations from luxury brands according to the characteristics above.
According to Kotler, market segmentation can be defined as ‘grouping buyers according to their separate products or their desired marketing mix (Kotler, 2013). This report will focus on the psychographic aspect of market segmentation. The concept of psychographic segmentation is defined as ‘grouping consumers according to their social class, lifestyle or personal characteristics (Kotler, 2013). Ultimately this will have a large impact on consumer behaviour towards luxury goods. Consumer behaviour is heavily impacted upon by psychographic behaviour, therefore making it an important aspect of market segmentation. Luxury goods are promoted effectively through firms’ careful consideration of consumers’ psychographic attributes.
A number of statistical studies have explored the effect of country-of-origin on consumers’ perceptions of products and how it influences the decision-making process. Studies by Heslop and Papadopoulous (1993, 2000) concluded that COO image is one of the most important influences on decision making for foreign-made products. These studies revealed that buyers evaluate COO using multiple criteria including the country’s level of advancement, the buyer’s feelings about the people of the country and the buyer’s desire to be more closely aligned with the country. In addition, a study by Liefeld and Wall (1987, 1991, 1993) found a positive relationship between product evaluation and the degree of economic development of the COO. Support of these finding was found in a study by Wang and Lamb (1983) in which it was determined that U.S. consumers evaluate products according to the country in which they are produced. Culture, political situation and economic development of the source country were contributing factors to this evaluation criterion.
Shiffman, L.G. & Kanuk, L.L. 2010. Consumer behaviour. 10th ed. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Nowadays, Global marketing is developing in this modern and competitive era, Country of Origin, as a significant parameter, has been studied by several researchers and has been shown that it has an effect on the behavior of consumers and on their purchasing. Other studies say that consumers also care where the products came from, where they were made and that, consumers are considering these things when evaluating the quality of products, (Parkvithee & Miranda,
Mooij, M.de. (2004). Consumer Behavior and Culture, Sage Publications, Page 102, Page 119, Page 274, Page 275