The Psychology of Sigmund Freud

2206 Words5 Pages

Sigmund Freud is one of the most controversial psychologists in history to this day, yet his theories and ideas are widely known. Freud made a crucial contribution to the study of understanding hidden human motivation (Lippman, 1996). “Hardly any discipline of thought has remained unaffected by the Freudian revolution but the impact has also been uncertain” (Pollack, 1984). Freud was also known as too important to ignore, but too impossible to digest (Pollack, 1984). Freud’s theories are criticized because his theories are very far fetched and his ideas potentially make many people feel uncomfortable, but that could be exactly the point that Sigmund was trying to convey (Liff, 1998). It was said “He was a disturber of the status quo and induced considerable criticism and devaluation even from his earliest work” (Liff, 1998). There are many criticisms of his work, especially with regards to psychoanalysis. “Do not believe anything you see written about Freud or psychoanalysis, particularly when it is written by Freud or other psychoanalysts, without looking at the relevant actually happened.”- Hans Eysenck (Lambert, 1992). Eysenck also stated that “Freud was a drug-addicted fraud who consistently lied about his work, and his followers have further distorted the truth about his contributions” (Lambert, 1992). He believed that psychoanalysis was the expression of Freud’s own neurosis (Lambert, 1992). Psychoanalysis was said by Freud to be a method of removing neurosis but had no experimental support (Moore, 1994.) However, psychoanalysis has come a long way to help many people with many psychological problems. Another major criticism towards psychoanalysis was there were no experimental methods being done, and all evidence of psy... ... middle of paper ... ...us?. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 285-301. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.23.2.285 Moore, S. (1994, Mar 05). Putting freud on the couch: The new view of the father of psychoanalysis: A man driven by the desire to become famous, who interpreted evidence to suit his theories and dismissed criticism with rhetorical flourishes. The Vancouver Sun, pp. B.4-B4. http://search.proquest.com/docview/243204117?accountid=12792 Pollack, S. D. (1984). The elusive freud. Psychoanalytic Review, 71(4), 517-527. http://search.proquest.com/docview/617064991?accountid=12792 Schlesinger, H. J. (1987). Freud on the couch, again! PsycCRITIQUES, 32(4), 324-325. doi:10.1037/026977 Webster, J. (2010). Nostalgia for the days of serious freud bashing. PsycCRITIQUES, 55(12) doi:10.1037/a0018219 Wilson, Glen D. (1987). Variant Sexuality: Research and Theory. Taylor and Francis.1987. 268 Pages.

Open Document