The Pros and Cons of Nuclear Power

980 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negative impact of nuclear power

There is only one earth, if we do not treat it with the respect it deserves today it could be gone tomorrow. With all of the environmentally unsafe things that we do major changes need to take place to make sure that does not happen. Air pollution, water pollution, and soil pollution all take place on a day to day basis. One major substance the vast majority of the planet uses today, fossil fuels. The burning of these fuels, such as coal or oil, gives us the power to be the productive people we are today but it is having a lasting effect on our own mother earth. There are many solutions bouncing around in the heads of many today, solar power, hydro power, and windmills. Those solutions, like many others, come with a set of problems like being expensive to start up, they are not possible in every location and the energy output would vary with the changing climate. Nuclear power on the other hand has the potential to be very efficient and the sooner it is adopted to the world today in wide scale use the better off we will be. Both the Union of Concerned Scientist in “Nuclear Power is an Environmentally Unsound way to Reduce Pollution” and Peter Schwartz and Spencer Reise in “Nuclear Power is the Beat Way to Address Global Warming” both argue for their possible solutions to preserve the planet but as you can see by the titles they use two completely different approaches.

What is more valuable today, the lives of people or the life of the planet? Arguments for this subject could go either way, Union of Concerned Scientist (UCS) wrote in “Nuclear Power Is an Environmentally Unsound Way to Reduce Pollution” that people should be the utmost concern. If the U.S. was to produce a large amount of plants it would cost quite a b...

... middle of paper ...

...ed solutions in a better fashion.

Works Cited

Schwartz, Peter and Reise, Spencer. "Nuclear Power Is the Best Way to Address Global Warming" The Environment. Louise Gerdes, Ed. Opposing Viewpoints® Series. Greenhaven Press, 2009. Peter Schwartz and Spencer Reise, "Nuclear Now!: How Clean, Green Atomic Energy Can Stop Global Warming," WIRED, vol. 13, February 2005. Copyright © 2005 Conde Nast Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission. Web

Union of Concerned Scientists. "Nuclear Power Is an Environmentally Unsound Way to Reduce Pollution". The Environment. Louise Gerdes, Ed. Opposing Viewpoints® Series. Greenhaven Press, 2009. Union of Concerned Scientists, "Nuclear Power and Global Warming," Union of Concerned Scientists: Position Paper, March 2007, pp. 1-4. Copyright © 2007 Union of Concerned Scientists. Reproduced by permission. Web.

.

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Waste

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    Radioactive Waste One of the most talked about opposition to nuclear fission is the radioactive waste it produces. Radioactive waste is what is left behind after using a reactor to make electricity. There are two levels of waste, low and high, but both are regulated by the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. High level waste is made up of fuel that’s been used directly in the reactor, which is highly radioactive but can still be disposed of. Low-level waste is the contaminated items that have been exposed to radiation.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Fukushima Nuclear Power

    1379 Words  | 3 Pages

    Energy is undoubtedly one of the most important issues facing the world today. While fossil fuels may produce enough energy at a low cost, it also has severe environmental impacts on the world. Wind energy is a clean source, but is also extremely expensive to maintain. Nuclear energy may be the best energy alternative to coals and oil, with the ability to produce much more energy with relatively low cost, while also being more environmentally sound.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech: We Must Use Alternative Power Sources Instead of Nuclear Energy

    1650 Words  | 4 Pages

    (Action): If we don’t do our part to stop the expansion of nuclear power plants, the future of our planet will be bleaker. Every year, thousands of more pounds of nuclear waste will be buried underground and the damage to our environment increases. There are more efficient energy sources other than nuclear power and we must do our part today to prevent a catastrophic future for our children. The dangers that nuclear power plants pose for the United States are very real. There are many alternative renewable sources of energy available to us such as wind and solar power, which provide a much safer and efficient alternative to nuclear power. You alone have the power to speak up and act against the expansion of this dangerous energy. The future of our environment’s safety and our nation’s energy supply lies in your hands.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Technology After the World War II

    953 Words  | 2 Pages

    Not only is nuclear power friendly to the environment, but it is almost always available, and many countries are starting to use it more. Renewable energy sources like solar and wind en...

    Read More

  • Nuclear Power Essay

    698 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, there are different opinions on the issue of the use of nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is only one of many energy options. Nuclear power can decrease pollution to the environment because it does not produce harming gases like other plants do. However, there are also drawbacks that can influences human health by emitting radioactive substances. Thus, all parties should make a deeper research and analysis based on the argument to decide the use of nuclear energy as a safe and cost effective source of energy.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On Nuclear Power

    949 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Face it. Nukes are the most climate-friendly industrial-scale form of energy” (Power, Reiss, Pearlstein, 655). This statement is what I’m trying to promote through my argument. It also ties Inconvenient Truths: 10 Green Heresies by Matt Powers, Spencer Reiss, and Jonanna Pearlstein and Nuclear Power is Best Energy Source: Potchef Stroom together by bring out the main point all authors are trying to get across. Global warming has been a big concern for years now and one of the biggest causes for it, is the burning of fossil fuels to get energy. People that live in the United States of America use a huge amount of energy in their daily lives and that amount continues to grow with our population growing with it. My purpose of this piece is to persuade people to switch to nuclear power for a cleaner energy source because it’s the cleanest energy source.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Global Warming

    1579 Words  | 4 Pages

    Media coverage of such cases have made the public less comfortable with the idea of moving further towards nuclear power and they only opt for reducing human activities to reduce global warming. It is true that there have been some notable disasters involving nuclear power, but compared to other power systems, nuclear power has an impressive track record. First, it is less harmful and second, it will be able to cater for the growing world population. Nuclear power produces clean energy and it delivers it at a cost that is competitive in the energy market (Patterson). According to the US Energy Information Administration, there are currently 65 such plants in the Unite States (National Research Council). They produce 19 percent of the total US energy generation.

    Read More

  • Does Hunting Help or Hurt the Environment

    1401 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...unting Hurt or Help the Environment? Scientific American. EarthTalk, New York. Print November 10, 2009

    Read More

  • Chernobyl

    451 Words  | 1 Pages

    Nuclear power has always been a controversial issue because of its inherent danger and the amount of waste that the plants produce. Once considered a relatively safe form for generating energy, nuclear power has caused more problems than it has solved. While it has reduced the amount of traditional natural resources (fossil fuels), used to generate power like coal, wood, and oil, nuclear generating plants have become anachronisms. Maintaining them and keeping them safe has become a problem of immense proportion. As the plants age and other technology becomes available, what to do with these “eyesores” is a consuming issue for many government agencies and environmental groups. No one knows what to do about the problem and in many areas of the world, another nuclear meltdown is an accident waiting to happen. Despite a vast array of safety measures, a break in reactor pipe or a leak in a containment vessel, could spell another environmental disaster for the world.

    Read More

  • Ethos, Pathos and Nuclear Energy

    1278 Words  | 3 Pages

    Something always curious and provoking happens in science writing. Gwyneth Cravens is an author of five novels and many publications, and one who studies a topic in great detail. She creates an enormous work about nuclear energy for the last decade. Cravens’s research in her last published book titled Power to Save the World: The Truth About Nuclear Energy has led her to do an about-face on the issue. In her article “Better Energy” which was published in May 2008 in Discover magazine, she disputes and claims that nuclear energy is currently best alternative and should be considered as our future energy source. At the beginning “Better Energy” she commences by introducing James Lovelock, who was greatly honored in the green movement for creating the Gaia hypothesis, which combines everything on earth as entirely organic. In the past Lovelock opposed nuclear energy. Unfortunately, to his fans, he changed his views beginning to support nuclear energy. Throughout the article Cravens goes with the explanation how the use of nuclear energy will be able to soft issue about global warming. Current fossil fuel power plants cause serious health problems in thousands of Americans, furthermore, continue to drive the warming. She tries to prove to the audience that currently there is no possibility that U.S. nation can use any of renewable energy sources such as the wind and sun (in which she looks to find common with public views about this case), and that nuclear energy is safe, and this is the best option to get the necessary amount of needed energy.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

    1262 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1945, when the Americans bombed Hiroshima, Japan, approximately 140,000 men and women were instantly killed by the effects of American nuclear defense. With such extreme brutality and force how many people must die for one to finally realize the strengths of nuclear bombs and what damage they can cause. Nuclear weapons should be outlawed because they kill thousands of innocent humans at a time, destroy the environment, and inviolate human’s right to moral and personal freedoms.

    Read More

  • The Impact of Nuclear Power

    1546 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nuclear power, the use of exothermic nuclear processes to produce an enormous amount of electricity and heat for domestic, medical, military and industrial purposes i.e. “By the end of 2012 2346.3 kilowatt hours (KWh) of electricity was generated by nuclear reactors around the world” (International atomic energy agency Vienna, 2013, p.13). However, with that been said it is evident that the process of generating electricity from a nuclear reactor has numerous health and environmental safety issues.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Environmental Philosophy

    1229 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...contemporary environmental crisis, we are able to gather a concise understanding of issues that are often hard to explain yet alone understand. Wealth has become a power system evoking dualism of the western and third world. Power and quality of life is measured against the wealth of an individual. This is a result of human’s tendency to over utilize and eventually deplete the resources available to them inevitably leading to overpopulation. In the next fifty years, the success of the environmental movement may depend much more on its ability to change ethics and values. Environmental philosophy gives an invaluable lens into the issues of overpopulation by deconstructing complex dynamics within society. By spreading ideas within environmental philosophy to all different corners of the globe then everyone will have a chance to learn how to live rightly in the world.

    Read More

  • Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy

    1323 Words  | 3 Pages

    As one of the greatest alternatives to fossil fuels, an important advantage of nuclear energy is the significantly lower emission rate of CO2 in comparison to plants which use coal and natural gas.2 Nuclear power is not reliant on fossil fuels and therefore producing energy by this method reduces pollution and the contribution to climate change. However, whilst the actual process of generating energy releases few emissions, uranium must be mined and purified and in the past this has not always been an environmentally clean process.2 Ultimately, uranium will one day run out, but nuclear reactors are versatile and may also run on Thorium. Despite being finite, this would allow nuclear power stations to function for a longer period of time.

    Read More

  • Recycling to Preserve Our Environment

    488 Words  | 1 Pages

    Many people assume that the environment is not in danger. They believe that as technology advances, we do not need to worry about renewing natural resources, recycling, and finding new ways to produce energy. They state that one person in the world does not make a large difference. In reality, each individual's contribution greatly affects our environment. Our natural resources are slowly disappearing, and we must work together to save them and the Earth from ruin.

    Read More

More about The Pros and Cons of Nuclear Power

Open Document