The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia

:: 5 Works Cited
Length: 1265 words (3.6 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Excellent
Open Document
Need writing help? Check your paper »

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Text Preview

More ↓

“Euthanasia is defined as a deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending life of another person to relieve that person's suffering and where the act is the cause of death.”(Gupta, Bhatnagar and Mishra) Some define it as mercy killing. Euthanasia may be voluntary, non voluntary and involuntary. When terminally ill patient consented to end his or her life, it is called voluntary euthanasia. Non voluntary euthanasia occurs when the suffering person never consented nor requested to end a life. These patients are incompetent to decide because they are either minor, in a comatose stage or have mental conditions. Involuntary euthanasia is conducted when it is against the will of the patient (Gupta, Bhatnagar, Mishra). Euthanasia can be either passive or active. Passive euthanasia means life-sustaining treatments are withheld and nothing is done to keep the patient alive. Active euthanasia occurs when a physician do something by giving drugs or substances that ends a patient’s life. (Medical News Today)
Our values, opinions and beliefs depend on what culture, religion and the society we come from. People who are against view euthanasia as murder and that we must respect the value of life. Those who are in favor of euthanasia believe that doing such act eliminates the patient’s pain and suffering. Also, the right to die allows the person to die with dignity. Euthanasia may involve taking a human’s life, but not all forms of killing are wrong nor consider as murder. It depends on the underlying reasons and intentions. If you value a person’s life and the cause of death is for the patient’s benefit and not one’s personal interest, then euthanasia is permissible.
Pain and suffering is one reason people support euthanasia. “Pain-relief treatment could or even would shorten life”. (32) Yet, it is justified if the purpose is to comfort and relieve pain. Providing adequate amount of pain-relief treatment is also a way to extend life. It lessens the patient’s distress psychologically and physically. (Somerville) Going beyond the limit by overdosing the patient will poison the body and hastens death. In this case, it is unacceptable because its intention is to kill a person’s life and not to comfort.
An Interview by Lesley Martin is an example of euthanasia. Lesley is a registered nurse who relocated to New Zealand to take care of her mother, Joy. She was diagnosed with bowel cancer. After surgery, multiple interventions and other complications, her condition deteriorated and was dying.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia." 123HelpMe.com. 18 Dec 2017
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=232863>.
Title Length Color Rating  
Active Euthanasia Pros and Cons Essay - Abstract Euthanasia is a long debated topic, going back for decades in our country alone. Both sides of the topic have valid points morally and ethically. The Netherlands have had euthanasia laws in effect since 1973. America has very few states with legislation on the books: Oregon enacted in 1997, Washington 2008. Germany experimented with Active Euthanasia in the 1930’s, resulting in one of the most horrendous genocides in the past millennium. No where else do we have a cohort more at risk than the elderly, as they fall prey to the pressures of getting out of the way, and with a burgeoning population of baby boomers now becoming the elderly our system already strained now faces even mor...   [tags: Euthanasia Essays]
:: 9 Works Cited
1625 words
(4.6 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Euthanasia: The Pros and Cons Essay - Euthanasia: The pros Anatomy Durkos Sarah Carter Jan 6, 2013 Over the years there has been a debate on whether euthanasia is a “humane” form of death. Some believe it isn't humane and others believe euthanasia is personal choice. Euthanasia is legal Australia and in four states in the united states. The legality of euthanasia is based on ethics primarily. I am pro euthanasia for many reasons; Euthanasia is cheaper, it ends the suffering of patients, and self determinism. Euthanasia is the assisted ending of a person life in response to pain and suffering....   [tags: voluntary, involuntary, pain]
:: 6 Works Cited
1289 words
(3.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia - Euthanasia, good or bad. In this following article I will be exploring euthanasia in more detail, the different Christian points of view, the strengths and weaknesses of the euthanasia argument and finally my point of view on euthanasia and why I believe this. First of all, what is euthanasia. It is something that not many people think about until they or a friend or family member is put in a position where they might actually have to consider it. Euthanasia, in the dictionary, simply is: the action of ending someone’s life in a painless way....   [tags: Pro Con Essays] 1076 words
(3.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on Arguments For And Against Euthanasia - Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable disease or unbearable suffering. The term euthanasia is derived from the Greek word for "good death" and originally referred to as “intentional killing” ( Patelarou, Vardavas, Fioraki, Alegakis, Dafermou, & Ntzilepi, 2009). Euthanasia is a controversial topic which has raised a great deal of debate globally. Although euthanasia has received great exposure in the professional media, there are some sticky points that lack clarity and need to be addressed....   [tags: Euthanasia Pros and Cons]
:: 6 Works Cited
1956 words
(5.6 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on Is Euthanasia Morally Acceptable? - Is it right to intentionally bring about the death of a person. The vast majority of people would instinctively answer this question “no,” unless it related to an act of war or perhaps self-defense. What if taking the life of the person would benefit that person by ending their suffering. Would it be morally acceptable to end their suffering. Questions like these are debated by those considering the morality of euthanasia, which is a very controversial topics in America. Euthanasia can be defined as “bringing about the death of another person to somehow benefit that person” (Pojman)....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Euthanasia]
:: 4 Works Cited
2344 words
(6.7 pages)
Research Papers [preview]
Essay on The Euthanasia Debate -    Euthanasia in this paper is examined in those countries which have legalized the procedure. And is found to be more of a burden than a blessing, indicating from the Dutch experience that it becomes an uncontrollable force once it has been legalized. There are welcome alternatives, for which proper training is necessary on the part of medical professionals. The original or first broad euthanasia program was for the purpose of "purifying" the German race under Hitler. It was a creation of German physicians, not of Hitler....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Euthanasia]
:: 10 Works Cited
2473 words
(7.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Essay on The Euthanasia Debate -      Qualifying euthanasia by calling it active or passive, direct or indirect, voluntary, non-voluntary, involuntary, or assisted suicide only confuses the picture. Euthanasia is when the doctor kills the patient. This simplification is made at the outset as an assist to the reader in more easily understanding the essential meaning without getting lost in hair-splitting verbiage. This approach does not compromise any of the excellent sources documenting this essay. The original or first broad euthanasia program was for the purpose of "purifying" the German race under Hitler....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Euthanasia]
:: 11 Works Cited
3048 words
(8.7 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
The Euthanasia Debate Essay - There are many different point of views on Euthanasia and whether or not it should be legalized. Many believe that since it is our bodies and our lives, we have the right to choose when we no longer want to live. On the other hand, there are great amounts of people who believe that euthanasia is considered murder and is not ethical. “One thing on which we all agree is that there is a true national crisis that surrounds the way Americans are dying” (Dr. Ira Byock.) The purpose of this paper is not to support either side, rather this paper will discuss what euthanasia really is, the past of euthanasia, and both the positive and negative sides of euthanasia....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Assisted Suicide]
:: 5 Works Cited
908 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
The Euthanasia Debate Essay - Euthanasia is defined as the painless killing of a terminally ill patient by means of lethal injection by a doctor in a controlled medical environment. Similarly, physician assisted suicide (PAS) is when a patient requests a lethal prescription from a doctor or pharmacist to end their life before a fatal disease does. The two are akin to each other and are almost interchangeable in definitions. Being a highly controversial topic, there is a plethora of arguments surrounding PAS, all very emotionally driven and opinionated....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Assisted Suicide]
:: 4 Works Cited
1219 words
(3.5 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Euthanasia: Dying with Dignity Essay - Euthanasia: Dying with Dignity Someday, a loved one may be faced with tough times or a terrible tragedy that leaves them in pain and agony for the rest of their life. It may not happen today, tomorrow, or even next month, but it is always a good idea to have a well thought out plan. A terminal illness could strike at any minute such as Lou Gehrig’s disease, or a car accident could leave someone paralyzed and miserable for the rest of their life. Permitting euthanasia would give the people the right to die with dignity and give them the option to not have to go through the pain, suffering, and stressful effects of a terminal illness....   [tags: hippocratic oath, pain, agony, pros and cons]
:: 11 Works Cited
3332 words
(9.5 pages)
Research Papers [preview]



Joy asked Lesley to promise not to let her suffer for a long time. Before Joy’s death, Lesley administered 20 mg. After an hour, she gave her another 40 mg of morphine. The prescribed dosage was only 10 mg over 24 hours. “The purpose of the intervention was to save Joy from dying inch by inch for several days”. (218) Few hours later, Lesley finally fulfilled her promise by suffocating her mother with a pillow. Of the two attempts she made, Lesley was guilty of overdosing her mother with morphine. With her intention to end her mother’s life, Lesley Martin was convicted of attempted murder. (Mitchell)
Generally, the use of morphine is to relieve excessive pain. Based on my experiences, I have witnessed several people taking morphine who do not live long because of its side effects. Some physician may even increase the dosage for more comfort. However, this type of euthanasia is acceptable because its purpose is to comfort and alleviate the person’s suffering. Unlike Lesley, her emotions lead her misjudgment. Although Lesley is a nurse, it is beyond her scope of practice to increase the dosage. If the increased dosage was prescribed by the physician, then administering it will be considered legal. In this case, Lesley would not be charged of overdosing Joy with morphine. Rather she would be convicted of suffocating her mother.
Pro-euthanasia also argues that each person has the right to die and die with dignity. The underlying debate is the person’s quality of life. For an instance, a 95-year-old woman diagnosed with severe heart disease and advanced Alzheimer disease. Her condition is terminal and would more likely to suffer further heart attacks. She may even die within days or weeks. The only way to save her for the upcoming future attacks is cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. Since the patient has dementia, she is incompetent to make decisions. Due to lack of mental abilities, others may view her life not worth living and be better off dead. Instead of saving, some will do nothing to allow the patient to die. It is morally wrong. However, there are exemptions. It may be unethical to shorten human life but it is acceptable if the purpose of not resuscitating is to alleviate suffering and benefit the patient. Also, if further treatment is futile and will only give excessive burden to the patient; then withdrawing treatment is acceptable (Keown, p 46).
My friend’s experience is another form of euthanasia. Her grandmother was a dialysis patient for almost 20 years. One day his appendix was ruptured and need to undergo appendectomy. The surgery was successful. While she was recovering, he suddenly had a cardiac arrest. She survived from the attack but it resulted her being on a comatose stage. The ventilator was the only means to stay alive. Doctor’s finding was that the patient’s heart was calcified due to long-term dialysis. A year passed, still no sign of improvement. For this reason, the doctor suggested to get her off the ventilator. It was a very difficult decision for the family. They wanted to prolong her life as much as possible. The family even asked for second opinions from other physicians, yet still received the same suggestions. Finally, the family decided to put her grandmother to rest.
The other two examples have a similar concept. Judging the person worthless due to mental conditions devalues a human’s life. Having disabilities or being unconscious does not mean they do not have the right to live. However, if future treatment is unnecessary and useless and that no other medicines or treatments could restore nor improve the person’s condition; then withdrawing life-sustaining treatments is acceptable and legal.
Based on the examples presented, Euthanasia can be acceptable under some circumstances. Euthanasia may involve taking a human’s life, but not all forms of killing are murder. Therefore, we must not conclude that euthanasia is completely wrong. To respect the value of life does not also mean that we have to prolong their suffering or shorten a person’s life. Our goal is to comfort the dying person and lessen their suffering as much as possible, even if such act is the cause of death. Yet at the same time, we must also abide the law. Being open-minded and considering all the issues surrounding the patient’s condition would help us determine if keeping a patient alive is the best option or may opt to euthanasia.



Works Cited
Gupta, Deepak, Sushma Bhatnagar, and Seema Mishra. "Euthanasia: Issues Implied Within."
Internet Journal of Pain, Symptom Control & Palliative Care 4.2 (2006): 1. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 16 Nov. 2010.
Keown, John. “Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalization”.
Cambridge University Press, (Apr. 2002). Web. 16 Nov. 2010
Mitchell, Kay. "An interview with Lesley Martin." International Journal of Palliative Nursing
10.5 (2004): 218-224. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 16 Nov. 2010.
Somerville, Margaret A. “Death Talk: The Case Against Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted
Suicide.” McGill-Queen’s University Press, (2001). Web 16 Nov. 2010
"What Is Euthanasia (assisted Suicide)? What Is The Definition Of Assisted Suicide Or Euthanasia?" Medical News Today: Health News. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. .







Return to 123HelpMe.com