Problems with Tax Evasion in Kenya

743 Words2 Pages

In Kenya, tax revenues make up to 80% of the government’s budgetary resources with a negligible proportion coming from grants and loans owing to the stringent conditionalities adopted as part of Structural Adjustment programmes (SAPs) imposed on the Kenyan government in the 1990s by International monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (Muriithi and Moyi, 2006). Government use taxation to raise revenues to cover their expenditures on the provision of social goods and services, to regulate the level of spending in the economy, redistribute income among the populace and control imports into the country (Wilkinson, 2007).
Different taxation methods are used to create a tax base which forms a pool that the tax authority can tap thereby placing a tax burden on the populace. Kenyan tax system is, however, often characterized by increasing number of non compliance among the small taxpayers and as a result of this the government has started to focus reforms specifically tailored to the SMEs so as to improve the level of compliance in Kenya. The most critical challenge to reforms is the presence of large untaxed informal sector causing high levels of revenue leakage. It is estimated that in the financial years 2000/01and 2001/02, only 65 percent to 69 percent of income tax revenue was collected by KRA (KIPPRA, 2004).
The puzzle of the economic theory as to why people evade taxes has extensively been discussed since Allingham and Sandmo (1972) strongly based their theory on economic crime theory; that the extent of deterrence, as a product of being detected and the size of fines imposed determines the level of compliance. The probability of being detected is shaped by the shared knowledge among categories of taxpayers and any deterrent measu...

... middle of paper ...

...ow compliance level among the small businesses in Kenya.TOT is a final tax levied at 3% of turnover and is payable quarterly on or before the 20th of the month immediately following the quarter. In its 4th corporate plan, KRA noted that whereas introduction of TOT was anticipated to “reduce the administrative burden of the small taxpayers and broaden the tax base in the informal sector”, it failed to achieve its 2008/2009 baseline value of 5,000 newly registered TOT taxpayers and Kshs.131 million in collections (KRA 4th
Corporate Plan). Tax reforms initiatives that have so far been undertaken in Kenya have chiefly focused deterrence and curing shortcomings created by the complexities in the tax code, the high tax burden and the high cost of filing returns and paying tax without addressing the problems that are created by lack of equity and fairness in the tax system.

More about Problems with Tax Evasion in Kenya

Open Document