Should a child be put in a small class or a large class?
So as a parent would you send your child to a class with over 30 kids? Many people have advocated that children, especially those in grades K-6, should not have to be in a class of 30 kids. A child’s first couple years of school should be a place of comfort to these kids, not a place of distress and confusion. Studies have shown that children who are taught in small classes are likely to achieve more later on, whereas those who begin school as a part of a larger class, do not. Class size is not something that just started to be a concern in the world of education. Class size has affected the way kids learn for a long time now. There are many things being done within the educational world to solve this problem. One of the most famous studies of this problem has been project STAR. This stands for Tennessee’s Student Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR) Project. This was created to find out what the right number ratio of kid to teachers should be the right one. This project kept track of 11,600 Tennessee students in 76 schools (Small Class Size, 1999). It stated in its report that children who participated in classes with 12-15 kid, did much better in school than kids who participated in classes with 25-30 kids (Small Class Size, 1999). Probably the worst part of the entire class size issue is that students know what they are missing buy being in a larger class. Here they interviewed three 2nd grade students in a class of 23 when asked what might be different if they were in a smaller class of 15 or 16 students and they said that "If I were in a smaller class, we would get to talk more," "I could ask more questions," and “I could make more friends and be Star of the Week longer...
... middle of paper ...
...l Class Size Produce Long-Term Benefits. (September 1999). NEA Today, 18(1), pp.33. Retrieved March 1, 2005 from EBSCO database at http://search.epnet.com/direct.asp?an=2214049&db=aph.
Kennedy, Mike. (2003 February). Sizing Up Smaller Classes. American School and University, 75(6), pp.15. Retrieved May 1, 2005 from EBSCO database at http://search.epnet.com/direct.asp?an=9155368&db=aph.
Finn, J. D. (1998). Class size and students at risk: What is known? What is next? National Institute on the Education of At-Risk Students.
Handley, P. (2002). Every classroom teacher’s dream. Educational Leadership, 59, 33.
Cruz, W. Klein Defends Plan for Third-Graders. Newsday pp.1B. February 12, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.classsizematters.org/
Merriam-Webster Online. Retrieved March 1, 2005 from http://www.m-w.com/netdict.htm
Daugherty, Paul. "College athletes already have advantages and shouldn't be paid." Sports Illustrated. Sports Illustrated, 20 Jan. 2012. Web. 25 Apr. 2014. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/paul_daugherty/01/20/no.pay/
Salvador, Damon. “Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid?” 20 April 2013.Web. 18 May 2014.
Eitzen, D. Stanley. "College Athletes Should Be Paid." Sports and Athletes. Ed. James D. Torr.
In 1986, the Tennessee legislature commissioned the Tennessee Class Size Experiment to determine if class size made a difference in achievement for disadvantaged students. After studying 79 different schools in 42 school districts for 4 years, the researchers found that class size only had an effect on students in kindergarten through 3rd grade, and that effect was minute. The impact was only on reading, not math, and smaller classes did not help disadvantaged students. A 2002 study of New York City schools showed that smaller schools, not smaller classes, had an effect on student success.
Education in America has existed as long as the nation itself. In fact, education began before Americans even landed in America—before the name “America” was commonplace, before the thirteen colonies emerged, before anyone had any thought to inscribe the words “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” English Puritans taught their children long division and cursive script while sailing across the rough waters on the Mayflower (“Colonial Education”). To distract young minds from the treacherous hurl and break of the Atlantic waves, parents encouraged the group to recite their Bible verses and name the twelve apostles (“Colonial Education”). There were only a few children aboard, about “20 adolescents, mostly boys,” but their importance superseded their numbers (“Children on the Mayflower”). The survival of the children “was of great importance to the survival of the Plymouth Colony,” so their parents invested great effort in their education. Once on land, schooling flourished from the confines of the ship to the vastness of unexplored territories and unlimited time. Eighteenth century colonial Separatists built small one-room schoolhouses devoted to religious studies, the wealthy Federalists of the nineteenth century formed English Grammar Schools to discipline future politicians, and twentieth century middle-class urban dwellers pushed for public education buildings amidst the bustle of city factories (“Early National Education”). As the people recognized a growth in population, they also recognized a growing value to schooling and learning. The nation flourished and expanded, and so did its educational system.
There are many aspects to an NCAA players eligibility, most of them are disputed against. One of these topics is players getting paid. Numerous questions are raised by this topic. The largest of these questions is “Should NCAA players get paid?.” Surprisingly, the pros for paying the athletes outnumber the reasons for not paying them. The athletes are basically workers for their school, they devote hours to their sport, they take time out of their classes, thus making their scholarships less valuable, and the NCAA teams would be more successful.
College sports have grown over the years, earning billions of revenue every year. However, what may seem surprising is that the athletes involved do not get a single penny earned from the revenue. These college sports require tremendous time and determination due to long hard practices along with rigorous course works. And due to the lack of time, athletes don’t often have the time for part time jobs that allow them to earn money to buy things they need or want for their personal life. Therefore, college athletes have every right to be paid for their hard work.
There are many people out there that believe that college athletes should not be paid because they are called to be a student first and an athlete second (Farrey). There are an ample amount of people and articles that suggest that paying college athletes is unfair and that they do not deserve to be compensated for their contributions to their respective schools. These people argue that these athletes and “st...
One of the hottest topics that modern science has been focusing on for a long time is the field of artificial intelligence, the study of intelligence in machines or, according to Minsky, “the science of making machines do things that would require intelligence if done by men”.(qtd in Copeland 1). Artificial Intelligence has a lot of applications and is used in many areas. “We often don’t notice it but AI is all around us. It is present in computer games, in the cruise control in our cars and the servers that route our email.” (BBC 1). Different goals have been set for the science of Artificial Intelligence, but according to Whitby the most mentioned idea about the goal of AI is provided by the Turing Test. This test is also called the imitation game, since it is basically a game in which a computer imitates a conversating human. In an analysis of the Turing Test I will focus on its features, its historical background and the evaluation of its validity and importance.
Districts have to think about if it is worth the money to reduce class sizes, and if there is enough proof that students are academically better off in smaller class size rather than larger classes. According to Matthew Chingos and Grover Whitehurt authors of Class Size: What Research Says and What It Means for State Policy, “Increasing the pupil/teacher ratio in the U.S. by one student would save at least $12 billion per year in teacher salary cost alone” (Chingos, Whitehurt). Why would districts want to pay for the creation of smaller classes when they could save more by just adding more students to a class? This goes to show that there should not be a price tag on someone’s education. Why put more on a teacher’s plate just to save money? With the result from the Student Teacher Ratio, it is hard for districts to say that having smaller class sizes is not the way to spend money. If the districts spent the money on the class size reduction, they would not have to worry about an annual cost, because once small classes are set in place, the districts do not have to continue to pay. According to the National Education Association (NEA), having class size reductions do not only involve money but also create “improved health, less Medicaid coverage, lower crime rates, and fewer welfare recipients” (Class Size Reduction: A Proven Strategy). So, the districts should also look at this before being concerned to where their money goes. The district’s money, according to the NEA, is going into these students who will live a better life later on when they are out of school and into the real
Although I live in a small city, the class sizes at my school are large. My larger classes have made it difficult to get the individual help I want, and I know from past experiences that I function at a higher level in a smaller classroom setting. Flagler’s smaller class sizeof 17/1 is very important to me and will benefit to my success.
Class sizes in America have been on a constant rise for years now, with little help from a budget, and almost no recovery from a slumping economy, which brings to light the age-old discussion; does class size really matter? With class sizes rising at a constant rate there is also no relief for students. There are many students who tend to struggle in certain subjects, and a smaller class could mean more individual time with a teacher and that could help improve their knowledge and comprehension of the subject. Our students are in classes day in and day out that are simply too big for even the finest teachers to handle, which impairs each individual’s learning. Therefore if teachers had fewer students this would enable them to give more individual teaching time to each student. Class size is important, and it has a large impact on our student’s education and that is why class size should be cut, specifically in Pre-K to third grade classes or classes which serve the most “at-risk” students.
Class size makes a huge impact on how the student learns. Along with many other things, there is more to the amount of kids in class than most people think. The quality one on one time is affected. Along with that, important questions that the students needs clarity on from the teacher might not be able to be answered because so many other students are in the room asking their own question. Students learn in their own ways. Teachers have to be flexible to how their students learn and in order to do that they need to know their students on a personal level. When class sizes are large, it effects students in negative ways in their learning.
The technological field has advanced to something far more than what people could have imagined just a half a century ago. The technological revolution has changed the lifestyle of societies just as the Industrial revolution changed the lifestyle of Europe. Who would have imagined the Internet and computers in most homes, when a computer could barely fit into an entire building, much less intelligent machines? Artificial Intelligence is an intriguing technology that will shape the human lifestyle of the future. Restricting research and progress in the field is hardly a feasible task in today's world. More realistically, we should monitor and keep the technology in a realistic and safe progression.
If class sizes where smaller, teachers would be able to do more hands on activities and there would be less chance for distractions. Even through, teachers would be able to do more hands on activities and there would be less chance for distraction. Teachers could do more hands-on activities in a science class likesuch as experiments in class instead of homework outside of class. In smaller class sizes there would be less chance for distractions, more time to review for a big test, there would be more interaction with the teacher.. “In elementary schools, class sizes generally hovered around 20 in 2008, rising to 25 to 30 in many cases this year.” (Giuliani, 1)There would be more time to review for a big test in a smaller class. There would be more interaction with the teacher in a smaller class size. According to Scott Thill “The proposal by billionaire Bill Gates to increase cl...