Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
immortality of the soul essay
immortality of the soul essay
immortality of the soul
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: immortality of the soul essay
Definition Essay – Defining the Soul of Man
"Soul" has, historically, always been tied up with morality and religious dogma, and I believe modern neuropsychology and psychobiology has effectively refuted any scientific basis for a "Soul." To state as fact, "The soul exists," one must first socratically define Soul. More on this later:
Soul, or Consciousness, is, without a doubt, tied up within the billions of curious things called synapses and cells, deep inside the brain. There are cases of people without consciousness, without the all important "I." Usually this happens through the onset of a coma, or sometimes the hippocampus is damaged. (which is where short-term memory, a necessary component of consciousness, is located.) These people do not function properly, and are unaware of themselves. (this is very difficult for us to comprehend, as we are self-aware, and so cannot place ourselves in an antithetical position.)
Upon death, all brain waves, all mental capacities, and all memories are forever lost. These things are all, again without a scientific doubt, stored in the brain-cells, where they are continually accessed when the brain is alive. But with the onset of death, (which is always and without fail the death of the brain,) these things become locked away in the tiny vaults of a billion cells, never to be accessed again.
But this does not irrefutably destroy the belief in Soul. It is much more complex, which is unnerving because a thorough explanation demands numerous paragraphs.
There are two major religious beliefs on the soul, and though they may seem diametrically opposed, we must remember that our ideas on the soul exist only because of the conditioned acceptance of these religiou...
... middle of paper ...
...ything that exists is energy, (as is the case), then we undeniably have a "soul."
But not in the conscious, creative, spiritual sense, only in a semantic sense.
Since consciousness is inextricably linked with soul, and we are only conscious while in our bodies, the "immortal soul" theory breaks down. How do we know it is immortal? Support that. Give empirical evidence for it.
You can't, so why believe in something that has no support, aside from an old dogma that has been contradicted a thousand times by science and empirical evidence?
But, as I said, if "Soul" means nothing more than "Energy," than we have a soul. But the moment "Soul" means anything else, science refutes it.
Works Cited
Masson, Jeffrey. "When Animals Weep." New York, Delacorte Press, 1995
De Wall, Franz. "Chimpanzee Politics." John Hopkins University Press, 1989.
Poverty is a significant threat to women’s equality. In Canada, more women live in poverty than men, and women’s experience of poverty can be harsher, and more prolonged. Women are often left to bear more burden of poverty, leading to ‘Feminization of poverty’. Through government policy women inequality has resulted in more women and children being left in poverty with no means of escaping. This paper will identify some key aspects of poverty for Canadian women. First, by identifying what poverty entails for Canadian women, and who is more likely to feel the brunt of it. Secondly the discussion of why women become more susceptible to poverty through government policy and programs. Followed by the effects that poverty on women plays in society. Lastly, how we can reduce these effects through social development and policy.
The soul is a mortal, dependent entity created by the body. The soul is the sum of all the parts in the body along with the experiences, accumulated knowledge, and innate instinctual knowledge. The soul is a corporeal entity that lives and dies with the body. This means that the soul is just a part of the body, they are inseparable entities. The soul as described in Plato’s Phaedo is described as individual, eternal, indivisible, and divine, but the soul is not any of these. The soul is what we would call our personality. The personality is created by the body growing and experiencing new things. It grows and gains knowledge of the world through perception. The body is the creator and lone owner of the soul, because as the body grows and develops
This view creates the best probability of there being an afterlife, and is thus supported by many religious followers who hope for the possibility of life after death. However, there are internal and existential flaws in the Soul Theory. Even if our essential characteristic as human beings is our soul, there is no explanation as to how the soul controls our physical body, known as the Pairing Problem mentioned by Jaegwon Kim. The soul is defined as immaterial, which means it can take up no physical space, and is essentially nowhere. Since the soul cannot be located, there is no existential proof of a soul, which gives the Soul Theory less merit than the Psychological Continuity Theory in which our psychology exists in our physical
V.S. Ramachandran’s Phantoms in the Brain is a well-written book for what he believes to be the causes for some neurological theories and mysteries. He covers many syndromes such as Phantom Limb syndrome, the Capgras Delusion, Cotard’s Syndrome, Hemi-neglect, Blind-sight, Motion blindness, Anosognosia, multi-personality disorder, and the Zombie with in each of us. When he talks about these syndromes he is arguing for the theory of not having a soul because it is not physically tangible and using the neurological theory of consciousness to prove said argument. Though there is a theory of the soul he consistently proves that there is no such thing as a soul that we can physically obtain in our world. So, the question is, do souls exist or are they a figment of imagination and a coping mechanism for humans? Souls do not exist because whether one believes in them or not, they cannot physically be dealt with in the real world as shown through patients with Phantom Limb Syndrome, Capgras Delusion, and Blind-sight syndrome.
Psychologists, sociologists and anthropologists study humor because it is a fundamental culture value, but they still can’t determine why certain things make some people laugh and others not. There are “humor quotient” tests that are designed to measure an individual’s sense of humor, but these tests are questionable. These tests aren’t accurate because almost all humor depends on cultural background knowledge and language skills. Not every person in the whole world, or even in one country share the same background knowledge and skills, therefore they cannot have the same type of humor. “The fact remains that individuals vary in their appreciation of humor” (Rappoport 9). Since humor varies from individual to individual, humor lies in the individual. How successful or funny a joke is depends on how the person receives the joke, humor cannot be measured by a statistical
Soul. A word without a true definition because it is so much more than an object. The soul is the root of life. The soul is found within the human body, a shield from evil, the essence of mankind. The desire to love, to be loved and be accepted by another group gives someone a soul.
I am not funny. If you were to ask my friends, they would inform you that I am only funny when I am not trying to be, as in the times when I trip and fall (which happens more often than I would like) or perform some other unintentional folly. If you were to ask someone else who doesn’t know me well, I am certain that “awkward” or “quiet” would be the words chosen to describe me far more often than “hilarious”. When I do try to be funny, I am generally aware that my jokes are bad; I rely on corniness and silly mannerisms rather than wit to elicit laughter. Due to my own shortcomings in the comedy department, I am genuinely curious about humor. What makes something funny and what purpose does humor serve?
It is true that there are people who need help more than others. It is also true that within those people who need help, there are certain groups who need more of it. The feminization of poverty is the rising amount of women who represent a disproportionate percentage of the world’s poor (Chant 202). In most cases, it is due to inequality that has been imbedded into societies for many generations. In the United States it is a common belief that every person should receive equal rights and o...
Accordingly, the model would be that a human person is a multi-level being in which there is a kind of ultra-powerful transcendental unity of both apprehension and life and that body is a real but lower appearance and effect of Unity. That Unity used to be called "soul".
Society." Punchlines: The Case for Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Humor. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2005. 150-63. ABC-CLIO eBook Collection. Web. 26 Feb 2012.
In today 's society, there is 1 in 7 people living in poverty which is costing Canadian citizens’ money as they are paying for taxes. There are many standpoints in which people examine the ways poverty affect society such as Marx’s conflict theory. Marx’s conflict theory goes over how social stratification being inevitable and how there is a class consciousness within people in the working class. Another way that poverty is scrutinized is by feminization. Feminization is the theory that will be explored throughout this essay. Poverty will be analyzed in this essay to determine the significance of poverty on the society and the implications that are produced.
I was the “funny guy” in my clique of high school friends. Ever since I learned to read English, I enjoyed reading and collecting joke books. I exhausted every single joke book from the small community library in town. Riddles, jokes about animals and wildlife, reasons why I didn’t do my homework, lawyer jokes, and later on, ethnic jokes. I knew they were funny, but I wanted more. Perhaps it was my lack of physical achievements that made me obsess with a need to entertain my peers.
The argument that the soul is not a body relies heavily on Aquinas definition of the soul. Also his differentiating between living and non-living beings. It is then concluded that the body is not considered animate or cognitive simply because the body is a body, but due to an intrinsic factor the body becomes capable of performing certain
The soul is the suit we choose to wear over the spirit. Spirit is the GOD piece we carry. Everybody has a spirit, which means everybody has a GOD within them. The soul is what we think we are and the spirit is what we truly are.
The soul can be defined as a perennial enigma that one may never understand. But many people rose to the challenge of effectively explaining just what the soul is about, along with outlining its desires. Three of these people are Plato, Aristotle, and Augustine. Even though all three had distinctive views, the similarities between their views are strikingly vivid. The soul indeed is an enigma to mankind and the only rational explanation of its being is yet to come and may never arrive.