Where Science is Going
What is the scientific world coming to? Is the educated community becoming a "secular priesthood"(Sokal Transgressing) of authorities maintaining and controlling the paths of the scientific world? Who or what determines where science goes: war, society, mass media? Alan Sokal, a physicist teacher from NYU, tried an experiment to show how some very smart people do some incredibly sloppy thinking. Writing an essay suggesting a link in quantum mechanics and postmodernism, Sokal was able to cause a heated debate among institutions of cultural studies that is still ongoing.
The document entitled "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" was published in the spring of 1996. Being a hoax, he wanted to see if: "a leading North American journal of cultural studies . . . would publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions"(Kimball).
He believed that the editors would have known right from the beginning that his paper was a swindle. He tells how he did this.
Throughout the article, I employ scientific and mathematical concepts in ways that few scientists or mathematicians could possibly take seriously. For example, I suggest that the "morphogenetic field'' -- a bizarre New Age idea due to Rupert Sheldrake -- constitutes a cutting-edge theory of quantum gravity. This connection is pure invention; even Sheldrake makes no such claim. I assert that Lacan's psychoanalytic speculations have been confirmed by recent work in quantum field theory. Even nonscientist readers might well wonder what in heavens' name quantum field theory has to do with psychoanalysis; certainly my art...
... middle of paper ...
...e Sokal Hoax Ought to Teach Us". Times Literary Supplement 20 Dec. 1996: 9 Dec 2000. .
Carroll, Robert Todd. "The Sokal Hoax". Skeptic's Dictionary. 9 Dec 2000. .
Fish, Stanley. " Professor Sokal's Bad Joke". New York Times 21 May 1996: 9 Dec. 2000. .
Rosen, Jay. "Swallow Hard: What Social Text Should Have Done". Tikkun Sept./ Oct. 1996. 9 Dec. 2000. .
Sokal, Alan D. "A Plea for Reason, Evidence and Logic". New Politics 6(2) Winter 1997. 9 Dec. 2000. .
--- "What the Social Text Affair Does and Does Not Prove." A House Built on Sand: Flaws in the Cultural Studies Account of Science. Oxford University Press. 8 April 1997: 9 Dec. 2000. .
--- . "A Physicist Experiments With Cultural Studies". Lingua Franca May/June 1996: 9 Dec. 2000. .
Weinberg, Steven. "Sokal's Hoax". The New York Review Of Books, Volume XLIII, No. 13. 8 Aug. 1996: 9 Dec. 2000. .
Fodor, Jerry (1997), “Special Sciences: Still Autonomous After All These Years”, Philosophical Perspectives 11: 149-163.
Second, in Bambara’s original, we revisit everyday life lessons multiple times. Cartwright summarizes one lesson as follows, “When Big Butt expresses his yearning for the microscope the children see at F.A.O. Schwarz, Miss Moore seizes the occasion to teach science and launched into a lecture on the invisible world around us” (61). He also wants us to consider the monetary lessons Sylvia is learning by keeping the change from the taxi ride as well. He uses her internal debate on the cost of a $35 clown and $1000 sailboat to indicate this additional
Polkinghorne asserts that “scientists are motivated by the desire understand what is happening in the world.”(551, Polkinghorne). As a physicist himself, Polkinghorne understands the desire to understand the world, even shifting careers to become a priest to better his understanding. Science asks how things happen, and does not attempt to answer every question. Questions asking why go ignored, as if they are not necessary to fully understand the world and the life that lives here. Science alone
He began writing about his hypothesis/ idea in 1864-65, and published the results in 1866. It was not until 1900 that his published findings were
In Fall of 1994, New York University theoretical physicist, Alan Sokal, submitted an essay to Social Text, the leading journal in the field of cultural studies. This essay, entitled "Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity," pretended to be a scholarly article about the "postmodern" philosophical and political implications of the twentieth century physical theories. However, as Sokal later revealed in the journal Lingua Franca, his essay was merely a mixture of deliberately concocted blunder, stitched together so as to look good and to flatter the conceptual views of the editors. After review by five members of Social Text's editorial board, Sokal's "cartoon" was accepted for publication as a serious piece of scholarship. It appeared in April 1996, in a special double issue of the journal devoted to rebutting the charge that cultural studies critiques of science tend to be riddled with incompetence (Boghossian).
Schlager, Neil, and Josh Lauer. Science and Its Times: Understanding the Social Significance of Scientific Discovery. Detroit: Gale Group, 2000. Print.
Segre, Kaplan, Schiff and Teller. Great Men of Physics: The Humanistic Element in Scientific Work. Los Angeles, CA: Tinnon-Brown, Inc., Book Publishers, 1969.
theme of Brave New World is not the advancement of science as such; it is the
Sigmund Freud, a physiologist, health physician, psychologist and husband of psychoanalysis, is ordinarily appreciated as one of the most influential and commanding thinkers of the twentieth century. Freud’s most meaningful and frequently reiterated allegation, that with psychoanalysis he had invented a novel science of the mind, however, this still remains the focus of much severe controversy and controversy.
A.J. Ayer, Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn. "Science and Non science: Defining the Boundary." Part 1. Pages 6-19. [...]
"Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences." A Postmodern Reader. New York: State U of New York, 1993. 223-42. Print.
Thus, Freud’s article does not give substantial answers and many things remain open for exploration and research. No doubts, his arguments are tangible and useful, but as much as he tries to go beyond and dig deeper, he still cannot fully defend them.
The longevity of success using psychoanalysis becomes a testimony to Freud’s in-depth study of the human mind. His forty plus years of work in the field were spent on the development of the main principles of psychoanalysis along with the techniques and methods used by the analyst. His work was furthered by his daughter and later adopted then adapted by Erikson. What seemed so revolutionary in the 1890’s and beyond has now become widely accepted by most all schools of psychological thought and its study.
Everyone says this generation is the future, the people and the citizens of tomorrow’s society. Except if this generation is not educated to grow and progress with the planet and learn how to help it, there will be no “next generation”; the earth simply will not be able to sustain our life forms. This is why science education is important to the future of our lives and our planet. Where if not for the innovation of science and its cures, we would still be living in the Dark Ages where the simple flu would have killed a family, and smallpox and other diseases caused epidemics and panics. Every day science classes are educating kids on the basics and the higher levels of science. Out of all these kids a few are bound to become doctors and research biologist that will help cure cancer, the planet of harmful pollutions, and more. One might say that science was the one that started the pollution in the first place, but as you can see, it has started to help fix the damage it has caused. Also, science education (although thought impractical by some) surrounds our everyday life and is need to understand some of nature’s simplest things. This is why science education is so important in the 21st century.
As the introduction prepared us for this, we can discern three different phases in the history of institutional development of science. If we put them in an order according to chronological interest that each phase has, we could say that the first one is the pre-science phase, the second is the science for gentlemen and the third is the phase of professional science. (Dr. Nedeva Maria, Lecture “The story of science”, 2006)