Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
compare and contrast the characters of laertes, hamlet and fortinbras
Hamlet and laertes character comparetive
hamlet laertes character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Truth versus Self in Hamlet by William Shakespeare
"This above all, to thine own self be true" (Act I scene 3 line 78) as expressed in Shakespeare's Hamlet, Prince of Denmark is a philosophical idea that strips away moral standards, accountability, and that selflessness is evidence of true love, as taught by
Jesus Christ. Professor Sir Walter Murdoch writes in The Policy of
Polonius, "As a matter of fact, of course, the lines are nonsense, and Shakespeare
was well aware that they are nonsense; he puts them in the mouth of a garrulous
old gentleman who spends most of his time talking nonsense" *http://home.pacific.net.au/~morrisqc/Murdoch/Polonius.htm*. The characters of Hamlet and Laertes live by this faulty philosophy and form defective character traits that ultimately lead them to death. The same can be said for Alfred in O'Neill's Before Breakfast, he follows a different path using the same philosophical ideals and ultimately ends up serving the same self centered desire. The assertion that somehow this philosophy can become stable with a sound individual falls short because it is without objective measurable standard. Left to our own self to decide what is good will always lead to a pantheistic view; one without hope, self-serving and motivated to satisfy any desire that we think is correct. Successful living depends on an established guide of moral standards, accountability, and selflessness.
Hamlet, Laertes, and Alfred have set their hearts and minds to do just as they please without regard how their actions affect others and without regard to moral standards. Hamlet and Laertes have settled in their own mind that the way to find peace is through the death of the person that murdered their fathers....
... middle of paper ...
... revenge. The meek inherit the land" (Leithart). To thine own self be true? I think not. Be true to God and His commandments, His judgment, and the philosophy that I must lay down my life if I want to find it. Jesus said, "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it produces much grain. He who loves his life will lose it, and he who hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life" (John 12:24-25 NKJ).
Bibliography:
Eliot, T.S., "The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism." Hamlet and His Problems Home Page 19 Nov. 2000 .
Leithart, Peter J. "The Serpent Now Wears the Crown: A Typological Reading of Hamlet." Contra Mundum No. 11 Home Page 19 Nov. 2000
.
Murdoch, Walter. "The Policy of Polonius". The Shakespeare Essays. Home Page
19 Nov. 2000 .
Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” Literature: An Introduction to Reading and Writing. Ed. Edgar V. Roberts. 9th Ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2009. Print
Shakespeare, William. "Hamlet." The Norton Introduction to Literature. Eds. Alison Booth, and Kelly J. Mays. Tenth. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 2011. 1024-1129. Print.
...on Hamlet. Ed. Don Nardo. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1999. Excerpted from Stories from Shakespeare. N. p.: E. P. Dutton, 1956.
"This above all: to thine own self-be true" (Hamlet Act I, Sc. III). In the beginning, Hamlet did try to stay true to himself, but as the story comes to an end you can see by Hamlet trying to do this he drives himself into madness. Hamlet’s loyalty to his father caused his indecision and narcissism. The actions of Claudius and Gertrude are the source of his father’s revenge, even though he says not to take revenge on Hamlet’s mother. As Courtney Price discusses in her “To Thine Own Self Be True: The use of Binary Opposition in Interpreting Shakespeare’s Hamlet.” Shakespeare's Hamlet offers an example of how attempting to change one's true nature in order to please others often comes at a high cost, not only to oneself but to others as well
Manning, John. "Symbola and Emblemata in Hamlet." New Essays on Hamlet. Ed. Mark Thornton Burnett and John Manning. New York: AMS Press, 1994. 11-18.
Foremost, is the character of Hamlet: the causes and effects of his actions, or lack thereof. Hamlet is a very thoughtful person by nature, and often spends more time thinking than acting. However, Hamlet does realize that "...conscience does make cowards of us all, And thus the native hue of resolution/ Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought"(III.i.84-85). Although Hamlet recognizes the fact that too much reflection could end poorly, he does it nonetheless. Every situation he is faced with he insists upon planning it out first, and rarely actually acting upon these plans. Additionally, since Hamlet is considered to be a tragedy, there must be a tragic hero. All tragic heroes have some kind of flaw or blemish, which, according to the article "Characters", "Hamlet's weakness may be that he 'thinks too much' and cannot make up his mind. The resulting inactions leads to his death" ("Characters"). Because Hamlet spends so much time pondering his surroundings, he sometimes misses the chance to act on them. This inability to accomplish anything slowly pulls Hamlet to a point where no amount of thought or action could possibly help him. However, at one point in the play Hamlet comes very near to followin...
Shakespeare, William. “Hamlet.” The Norton Introduction to Literature. Ed. Kelly J. Mays. 11th ed. New York: Norton, 2013.1709-1804. Print.
Boklund, Gunnar. "Hamlet." Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. Gerald Chapman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.
If it is justifiable to look for logic and consistency in Hamlet, as Eliot did, one can find a far gre...
Hamlet. Ed. Mark Thornton Burnett and John Manning. Hamlet Collection 1. New York: AMS, 1994. 103-16.
Shakespeare, William, Marilyn Eisenstat, and Ken Roy. Hamlet. 2nd ed. Toronto: Harcourt Canada, 2003. Print.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. New York: Simon, 2009. Print.
In conclusion, Shakespeare’s Hamlet contains a very conclusive moral order. Each crime committed is punished, and each morally wrong action is balanced by one that is right. Claudius’ murder and plots are balanced by Hamlet’s internal struggle with his own conscience and morals as he tries to right the wrongs committed against him. Hamlet’s indecisiveness throughout the pay were because of his morals even with the murder of his father he could not kill Claudius in prayer. This shows the opposite side of the moral issue, and helps to ensure that in the end, there is no imbalance.
Corum, Richard. Understanding Hamlet: A Student Casebook to Issues, Sources, and Historical Documents. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1998. Print.
Spinrad, Phoebe S. “The Fall of The Sparrow And The Map Of Hamlet's Mind.” Modern Philology 102.4 (2005): 453-477. Humanities International Complete. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.