Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
self perspective compare to Plato
reflection on plato's ideas
censorship of plato
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: self perspective compare to Plato
Censorship, Necessary or Not In Plato’s Republic, he tries to develop a utopia for mankind. He utilizes conversation amongst people within in his book as a vehicle for larger and more serious topics to be discussed. One of the most important propositions made in these discussions is when Socrates and Glaucon are deliberating on the issue of censorship and its necessity in the beginning of “Book III.” Plato leads me to believe that censorship is a necessary evil that must exist to protect the city as a whole. The question arises when addressing this subject matter; does society need censorship to rise to its full potential? Plato seems to think yes, but for me the jury is still out. “Book III” of the Republic begins by talking about how to create warriors and what the necessary precautions needed to convince people that death is not a bad thing are. Plato wants to invent citizens that are “unafraid of death, preferring it to defeat in battle or slavery (386b4).” Plato believes that the only way to do this is through the censorship of materials that people are exposed to. Plato wants to create a society where everyone worthy of enough desires to be a warrior and where citizens are volunteering to fight for their city-state. The only way he believes it is possible to eliminate people’s fear about death is by eliminating the stories they have been raised on. Plato further reflects on this idea of censorship by saying: Then we must supervise such stories and those who tell them, and ask them not to disparage the life in Hades in this unconditional way, but rather to praise it, since what they now say is neither true nor beneficial warriors (386b7-386c1). Many modern day people have taken what Plato sai... ... middle of paper ... ...ind for centuries. The real question though should be if censorship is used what kind of effect does it have on the people subjected to it. Part of ancient Greek culture is the stories that were told about the underworld and their theater portrayals of death. I’m not saying that more stories can’t be told to glorify the life and death of a warrior, but the elimination of all those that don’t praise it ridiculous. Citizens deserve a chance to come to their own conclusions about whether they want to join the military or not. Another consideration is that even though Plato believes that people are self-interested, which they are for the most part, that doesn’t mean that when push comes to shove and their civilization is being attack they won’t stand and defend it. Plato was wrong in my opinion on the topic of censorship. It sounds more like brainwashing to me.
Many say that censorship limits what people can do, but others think differently. Censorship in the United States limits the freedom of what some can do and does not allow teens to read about important situations that could happen in life, listen to positive or negative music, and watch certain shows for them to experience. Many people think that censorship is not necessary and that what is produced to the public, the parents should be alright with it.
Censorship is one of the most heatedly debated topics in America today. Censorship exists in several forms, ranging anywhere from censorship in the media to the banning of books. The question on whether censorship is ethical or not, has been asked all throughout history, stemming from the times of ancient Rome. Now in the 21st century, America faces new, and old, problems pertaining to censorship such as its violation of human rights, this is because censorship impairs an individual's freedom of speech and press. Also censorship has negative effects on art and human expression, as it creates boundaries on an artist's’ creativity, thus effecting the multimedia industry. On a societal scale, censorship prevents students from learning about the harsh realities that exist outside of a controlled school environment, leading to ignorant and naive adults. Censorship should not exist in America, as it is unconstitutional, takes away the true meaning of an artist's’ intentions, and works to make future generations ignorant.
Censorship is considered bad for our society in many peoples eyes because it is blocking us from knowing the truth about lots of things. But is blocking us from things always a good result? I believe that censorship does both good and bad for our society. When we get blocked from knowing things because our government doesnt want us to know about certain things, we eventually will know about it becuase of technology now of days. People will hack into certain websites to get things that are supposed to be censored from us, and if one person finds out something then a lot of people will know because things spread around very fast.
Censorship is an evil necessity. As much as it is disliked, it can provide a much needed protection in society. It saves society from knowing information that could potentially be harmful or disruptive to our well being. People pretend to want to know everything; they want to be included. Nevertheless, people need safety and reliability. Sometimes, censorship can provide us with the safety net that is needed.
Censorship plays a huge role in today’s society. Censorship effects society in excellent ways by putting a blind fold on certain types of media, language, and other social values that should not be seen by all humans. Censorship is known to many as being listed under the category of moral. Censorship is moral, because it bans certain books from schools that should be banned, it helps parents keep their children from material they should not be in acquaintance with, and is politically correct for society and students due to its ethical values. Censorship is effective in many ways and should be used regularly due to its effects on students and society.
Censorship is harmful because it stops one from gaining the full truth in any situation take Yang Geof in “ The care for censorship in the new social age”. This passage is mainly about how the world can be more productive with acknowledging a subject in taking it head on rather than ignoring it. Having the ability to speak freely without repercussion could spark honest discussions about important topics such as politics.
It won't kill us to make limits, but it might if we don't. That is why it is JUSTIFIABLE to limit adult's freedom of expression--it is in our, society's, best interests to protect the children. Lional Tate is just one example of a child gone bad because of the media. Tate mimicked his idol the Rock, killing a six-year old girl by smashing her skull, pulverizing her liver, breaking her ribs and causing numerous cuts and bruises. If that's not enough of an example what about the teen from New Jersey who simply listened to Ozzy Osborne's "Suicide Solution" and killed himself? These are not random occurrences, we hear about them on the news frequently. If our freedom of expression is harming kids why can't we fix the problem by not allowing them access to it?
Censorship is the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security (oxford). Censoring has been in debate for decades. We can recall the speech of former President John F. Kennedy that shocked the whole nation and world. In his speech he spoke of secrecy of secret societies, the need for the American people to know what the government was doing (transparency) and how the media should inform the public at all times (science experiments) without being censored. I agree with a lot of what he said in the speech. However, I also believe that censorship is a doubled edged sword, depending on the circumstance/topic. For example, if the government has
...speech and press ideas, and even the types of material we are allowed to watch in movies, censorship is a hot topic of this generation. Yet many would disagree on the how censorship should be used, all agree that, in a fundamental form of society, it is needed to protect the public. If government officials would move away from the total control of material as in the past and instead move toward a more age locked form of censorship, where material is only available to the public by either reaching a certain age and buying it themselves or by parent consent, maybe this institute of civilization can be finally used in an ethical and freedom protecting sense. One where the people, not elected officials got to decide what they were mature enough to experience, one where censorship was used in a moral sense rather than a way to keep the ideals of ruling officials alive.
Our country prides itself in the freedoms it brings; we are the “land of the free” after all. Looking on the U.S. from other countries, we are indeed free. However, this freedom comes at the cost of hidden restrictions and cases where we are more imprisoned than free. Largely, times when our freedoms are limited are for the benefit of the greater good; or at least that is what we are told by our government. Freedoms of religion, press, assembly, petition, and speech are all guaranteed by the first amendment of the constitution. Unfortunately these are promises that the government cannot keep. A main goal of the U.S. government, besides ensuring its citizens freedoms, is the safety of its people. By definition, freedom involves anything imaginable, and if all were allowed the freedom to everything, chaos would ensue. However, that is not to say that all freedoms should be limited. In particular, freedoms regarding speech, more specifically free speech within the public media, are drastically limited when it comes to the ability of one to broadcast their ideals. The issue is not entirely of government control. Political correctness is something that has had a large effect on the media over the past few decades. No longer can anyone, anywhere be offended by anything. If people dislike what someone says, fights erupt, court cases are established, and someone pays for it. This idea that speech can be limited by what someone else, who can choose whether or not to observe the presented ideas, feels about a given subject is something that has no place in our society.
Censorship as defined by Wikipedia is the suppression of speech or other public communication which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient as determined by a government, media outlet or other controlling body. This context in itself is not acceptable as we have no rights to limit a person’s freedom of speech as that is the basic right we have as humans. However, censorship is a step taken by relevant authorities in order to maintain national security and stability, limit actions that may insight disregard for the law be it violence or causing harm to others and prevent the corruption of children. The first point that is going to be pointed out in this essay is regarding national security and stability. It is a common practice by governments aro...
Since the foundation of the United States after a harsh split from Britain, almost 200 years later, an issue that could claim the founding grounds for the country is now being challenged by educators, high-ranking officials, and other countries. Though it is being challenged, many libertarians, democrats, and free-speech thinkers hold the claim that censorship violates our so-called unalienable rights, as it has been proven throughout many court cases. Censorship in the United States is detrimental because it has drastically and negatively altered many significant events.
Is Censorship Justified? Ever wondered the reason behind racial discrimination, sexual discrimination, children committing crimes or violence? The main reason is that censorship is not properly imposed or there is a need for censorship in the society. Censorship is the suppression of ideas and information that certain people, individuals, groups or government officials find objectionable, offensive or dangerous to others. There are varieties of other definitions, but all have in common the concept of withholding information and/or resources from those who seek it.
Censorship affects our society in many different ways, it affects the music we listen to, the movies we watch, the books we read, and many other aspects of our everyday lives. Even though many might argue that censorship doesn't really have a place in a society that emphases freedom of speech and the freedom to express oneself, but censorship is an essential and needed part of our growing society, it's needed in the television industry, the Internet, and the music industry. Censorship helps to make our world a better place because it creates a better environment for us to live in.
As new technologies evolve and become a part of our daily lives, so do television shows and what people are allowed to view on a regular basis. Censorship, a word that seems to be causing quite some controversy over certain people may not be such a bad idea. As America has seen, a countless amount of people have been known to complain about censorship on television. Although this seems to be a problem to some, maybe the real question to be asked is, is there enough censorship of television? Many families agree that certain rated R movies should not be shown to young children and only certain shows