Critique of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument

955 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: aristotle's view of god

Critique of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument

Aquinas's 3rd way suggests that the world consists of contingent

beings. As all contingent beings have a cause, namely another

contingent being, there must have been a time when nothing existed,

(unless contingent beings exist as a brute fact). Therefore,

contingent beings could not have come into existence unless there is a

necessary being which is non- contingent that caused them. Aquinas

named this being God. The problem with Aquinas's view is that as

physicians have suggested matter is eternal and therefore a necessary

being is not required to cause contingent beings.

The basis of Aquinas's argument depends on the fact that contingent

beings require a cause which is in turn contingent. "Contingent beings

require contingent causes", as stated by Stephen Evans in Philosophy

Of Religion(55). This basis leads one to believe that an infinite

series of contingent beings exists, but Aquinas claims this to be

"illogical", thus the need for a necessary being. The objections occur

due to the nature of contingency and the recently suggested, eternal

nature of matter.

Contingency was defined as "beings that are generated and perish" by

Aquinas in Peter Cole's Philosophy of religion(21). Therefore, by

definition, the necessary being must be eternal and have existed

through all time. But is it not possible that the necessary being's

contingency will be shown in the future through its perishing? This is

suggested in Philosophy of religion by Peter Cole. Thus the necessary

being will be proved to be contingent and further prove that an

infinite series of contingent beings is possible and that a ...

... middle of paper ...

...ency within the universe is

very doubtful in light of matter being eternal. It seems that if a

necessary being does exist then it is within the universe and can be

defined as matter which is a brute fact and thus implies the universes

eternality. This undermines Aquinas because he stated that the

necessary being was separate from the universe and also that the

universe was finite. Thus, this argument has cast doubt over Aquinas's

argument and leads to a belief in the infinite oscillation theory as

well as pantheism.

Bibliography

Cole, Peter. Philosophy Of Religion. Great Britain: Hodder & Stoughton

1999

Evans, C.Stephen. Philosophy of Religion: Thinking about faith.

Illinois: InterVarsity Press 1982

Peterson, Michael. Philosophy of Religion. Trans. J.L. Mackie. New

York: Oxford University press 1996

Show More
Related

  • The Main Strengths of the Cosmological Argument

    524 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Main Strengths of the Cosmological Argument There are many strengths within the Cosmological Argument which have proven theories and ways to prove the existence of God. Many of these strengths have come from such scholars as; Copleston, Aquinas and Leibniz, all of which have put together major points to prove the existence of a non-contingent being. One of the main strengths of the Cosmological Argument is from Aquinas way I that was about motion. This would be a posteriori argument because you need to gather evidence from the world around you.

    Read More

  • Key Features of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

    561 Words  | 2 Pages

    begin with. This we call God, so we call God the prime mover i.e. the

    Read More

  • The Premise of the Cosmological Arguement and Some Objections

    1006 Words  | 3 Pages

    Parmenides of Elea once presented the expression ex nihilo nihil fit, which translates to nothing comes from nothing for one of his many theses. The Cosmological Argument, an argument of the posteriori category, meaning that it requires data based on past experiences, argues for the existence of God with this type of expression at its core. By attempting to prove how the universe must be influenced by an independent being that has godlike qualities, cosmological arguments suggest that it is rational to believe in an omnipotent being and its accountability of creating the universe.

    Read More

  • Bertrand Russell and Saint Thomas Aquinas’s Arguments on God's Existence

    595 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this paper I will be exploring two arguments on the topic of the existence of God. In particular, I will focus on Saint Thomas Aquinas’s efficient causation argument for God’s existence and an objection to it from Bertrand Russell. After an analysis of Aquinas’s argument and a presentation of Russell’s objection, I will show how Russell’s objection fails.

    Read More

  • Aquinas' Third Way

    471 Words  | 1 Pages

    Aquinas’ third way argument states that there has to be something that must exist, which is most likely God. He starts his argument by saying not everything must exist, because things are born and die every single day. By stating this we can jump to the conclusion that if everything need not exist then there would have been a time where there was nothing. But, he goes on, if there was a time when there was nothing, then nothing would exist even today, because something cannot come from nothing. However, our observations tell us that something does exist, therefore there is something that must exist, and Aquinas says that something is God.

    Read More

  • St. Thomas Aquinas’ First Two Ways in Proving the Existence of God

    5036 Words  | 11 Pages

    It is my view that God exists, and I think that Aquinas’ first two ways presents a

    Read More

  • St. Thomas Aquinas 5 Argument To Demonstrate The Existence Of God Analysis

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    St. Thomas Aquinas presents five arguments to demonstrate the existence of God. However, this paper focuses on the fifth argument. The fifth argument is regarded as the Teleological Argument and states that things that lack intelligence act for some end or purpose. While the fifth argument satisfies God’s existence for Aquinas, some contemporary readers would argue that Aquinas neglects the laws of physics. Others argue that Aquinas allows a loophole in his argument so that the Catholic conception of God is not the only intelligent designer.

    Read More

  • Saint Thomas Aquinas' Five Proofs for the Existence of God

    1916 Words  | 4 Pages

    Scientific reasoning has brought humanity to incredibly high levels of sophistication in all realms of knowledge. For Saint Thomas Aquinas, his passion involved the scientific reasoning of God. The existence, simplicity and will of God are simply a few topics which Aquinas explores in the Summa Theologica. Through arguments entailing these particular topics, Aquinas forms an argument that God has the ability of knowing and willing this particular world of contingent beings. The contrasting nature of necessary beings and contingent beings is at the heart of this debate.

    Read More

  • Aquinas and Edwards

    1234 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... does a good job of arguing against the cosmological argument, Aquinas could still be able to defend his argument. Aquinas believes that God’s existence is not only an article of faith. He denies that God’s existence is an unnatural disclosed truth. Instead, Aquinas believes that God’s existence is verifiable. He argues that God’s existence is already presumed through faith and teachings. He claims that God’s existence can be subject to demonstration and that for those believe who believe God’s existence, it will be a matter of faith. Subsequently, not everyone will be able to fully agree with or understand Aquinas’ reasoning or verification for God’s existence. If one agrees with Aquinas they are able to accept his claims through the belief of faithful teachings rather than by the way that those who may not accept it and only search for distinct means of reason.

    Read More

  • Anselm and Aquinas: on the Existence of God

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    Does God exist? That question has been asked by people for centuries. Christians, Jews, and Muslims would all say that God exists. They would claim that He is the creator of all things and is of a higher being than man is. Others would claim either that God does not exist or that God is not what the Christians, Jews, and Muslims say He is. Both Anselm and Aquinas address this question: Anselm in his "Proslogion" and Aquinas in his "Summa Theologica." The opinions of Anselm and Aquinas as to the nature of God are the same, although Anselm lacks the proof to back up his claims.

    Read More

  • Argument For The Cosmological Argument

    1427 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this universe everything has a cause of its existence, so this universe might have a cause, but no is sure who created, so we as humans think that God created this universe, but unless if you’re an atheist who doesn’t believe in God. The reason time exist because of this universe, which mean that time has a cause and time didn’t exist before if the universe wasn’t existed. At the end of the day, as opposed to surmise that God exists, we may think there is only an interminable relapse of causes. Something has dependably existed. God's presence isn't coherently demonstrated, yet it is likely, given the premises. Considered without anyone else, the claim God exists is exceptionally implausible, says Swinburne. However, in light of the cosmological contention, it turns out to be more plausible, on the grounds that God's presence is the best clarification for why the universe exists. God is the real reason why orders and purpose of things that we find on this universe, according to design, viz. We can include the contention from religious experience and a contention from supernatural occurrences. Each work a similar way, “The presence of God is the best clarification for these wonders”. When we set up every one of these contentions together, he asserts, it turns out to be more likely that God exists than that God doesn't. the premises are conceivable, and the inductions are natural. So, in spite of the fact that it isn't an explanatory

    Read More

  • Aquinas’ Cosmological Arguments

    1633 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aquinas’ Cosmological Arguments The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, as propounded by Thomas Aquinas, also known as the Third Way. It is the third of Five Ways in Aquinas's masterpiece, "The Summa" (The Five Ways). The five ways are: the unmoved mover, the uncaused causer, possibility and. necessity, goodness, truth and nobility and the last way the teleological.

    Read More

  • Thomas Aquinas Work to Prove the Existence of God

    1029 Words  | 3 Pages

    Being a devout Christian, Thomas Aquinas naturally believed in God, but he wanted to prove God's existence to those who could not accept things on faith alone. As a result he made five proofs, which he claims, prove the existence of God. With each proof there is always a beginning, a starting point, Aquinas claims it must be God that is the beginning of each. The first proof does not do complete justice to Aquinas’s claim that God exist, while the fifth proof could be used alone to prove Gods existence.

    Read More

  • Aquinas' Arguments for the Existence of God

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    Aquinas' Arguments for the Existence of God In Summa Theologica, Question 2, Article 3, Aquinas attempts to prove the existence of God. He begins with two objections, which will not be addressed here, and continues on to state five arguments for the existence of God. I intend to show that Aquinas' first three arguments are unsound from a scientific standpoint, through support of the Big Bang theory of the creation of the universe. In the first and second arguments Aquinas begins by stating that some things change and that the changes to these things are caused by things other than themselves. He says that a thing can change only if it has a potentiality for being that into what it changes.

    Read More

  • Thomas Aquinas's Five Arguments For The Existence Of God

    637 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thomas Aquinas uses five proofs to argue for God’s existence. A few follow the same basic logic: without a cause, there can be no effect. He calls the cause God and believes the effect is the world’s existence. The last two discuss what necessarily exists in the world, which we do not already know. These things he also calls God.

    Read More

More about Critique of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument

Open Document