The Attachment Theory in Child Psychology

2246 Words5 Pages

The Attachment Theory in Child Psychology The term "attachment" describes "an infant's tendency to seek closeness to particular people and to feel more secure in their presence" (Atkinson et al, 2000, p90). This essay will attempt to provide a brief and up to date summary of attachment theory and research, show how it is linked to Child Abuse, the Family, and Children and Divorce, critically evaluating attachment's predictive value. One of the most influential theories in the history of attachment has been that of John Bowlby developed during a study of the mental health of homeless children for the World Health Organisation in 1951. This proposed a multidisciplinary stance in which psychoanalysis appears to be integrated with paradigms such as ethology's "imprinting" phenomenon and "critical period" (Lorenz (1935) cited in Durkin (2000) p83), cybernetic theory of control systems (Bowlby (1988) p3), social, (Hodges & Tizard (1989)), and cultural psychology (Gnaulati & Heine (2001)). Whereas it seems that Freud and virtually all subsequent analysts had worked from an end-product backwards, whilst agreeing with the importance of the relationship with the mother, Bowlby took the reverse position to understand the origin, function and development of the child's early socio-emotional relations. His early research concluded that the development of a "warm, intimate, and continuous relationship with his mother" Bowlby, (1953) cited in Gross (2000) p550, was crucial for the infant to achieve successful close and personal relationships as an adult. Highlighti... ... middle of paper ... ...this complexity of variables is indicative of the problems encountered with predictions in individual development and Dunn, (1993) p114, would argue that the use of the attachment framework for predicting relationships in later life is "both limited and limiting". Indeed, it is doubtful whether attachment categorisation would hold true for children with congenital abnormalities and special needs such as autism, which classification alone offers predictive potential in its own right. In retrospect, that attachment categorisation alone can accurately predict a child's circumstances or future appears to be a somewhat of a tenuous claim and raises the question as to whether an attachment construct has any value at all from logical and scientific point of view (Weinraub et al. (1977). Ainsworth, M.D.S.(1989). Attachments

Open Document