Efforts to Break the Stalemate on the Western Front

586 Words2 Pages

Efforts to Break the Stalemate on the Western Front

There are five main factors that are crucial in explaining the

development of a stalemate on the Western Front. All the armies and

navies of Europe faced each other across fortified front lines. The

pre-war plans had succumbed to the technological surprise of 1914-15:

that the withering firepower of machine-guns, cartridge rifles, and

rapid-fire artillery favoured the defence. Infantry in deep trenches,

fronted with mines and barbed wire and backed by artillery, could not

be dislodged by frontal attack. Accordingly, military and political

leaders spent the war groping for means of breaking the stalemate in

the trenches. First, neutrals might be enticed to enter the war,

perhaps throwing enough weight into the balance to provide victory.

Second, new weapons, tactics, and theatres might break the deadlock or

achieve strategic goals elsewhere. Third, more and more men and

material might be squeezed out of the home economy to tip the balance

of forces or wear down the enemy by economic attrition. The first of

theses means determined much of the diplomatic history of the war. The

second stimulated technological developments such as poison gas,

tanks, and submarines, as well as the peripheral campaigns of southern

Europe and the Middle East. The third determined the evolution of war

economies and the character of what came to be called total war.

In 1916 German strategists again turned west with the expressed

intention of bleeding France white and breaking her army's spirit. The

object of attack was to be the fortress of Verdun, and the plan called

for substitution of ordnance for manpo...

... middle of paper ...

...arose.

The Schlieffen plan represented a pristine militarism: the belief that

all factors could be accounted for in advance, that execution could be

flawless, that pure force could resolve all political problems

including the plan itself. By October 1914 all the plans had

unravelled. After the German defeat in the battle of the Marne, the

Western Front stabilised into an uninterrupted line for 466 miles from

Newport on the Belgian coast south to Bapaume, then Southeast past

Soissons, Verdun, Nancy, and so to the Swiss Frontier. Both sides

dug-in, and condemned themselves to four years of hellish stalemate on

the Western Front.

I conclude that the most important three factors are none of them;

they all are equally the same as they play their different roles in

the development of a stalemate on the Western Front.

More about Efforts to Break the Stalemate on the Western Front

Open Document