Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
death penalty capital punishment
capital punishment alexie
the death penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: death penalty capital punishment
Capital Punishment
For my Personal Research Study (PRS), I am going to research Capital
Punishment. Capital Punishment is about taking a life for a life(s).
For example if you commit a crime like Murder and you are convicted of
murdering someone you could end up being killed by "The Electric
Chair" or you could get an injection that will kill you. Capital
Punishment is an interesting topic because people have debated about
this subject for years.
The question I have chosen for my PRS is should Capital Punishment be
reintroduced?
My hypothesis is Capital Punishment should be reintroduced for crimes
severe enough such as Mass Murder and Treason i.e. murdering a
Queen/King or President of a country. The topic I have chosen is part
of the Beliefs and Values unit that I have studied in Humanities. My
hypothesis is based on the Key Idea. Individuals and groups have
different beliefs, attitudes and values regarding cultural, moral,
political, religious, spiritual and social issues.
I will use a range of research methods to investigate my hypothesis.
For my secondary methods I will use books, the Internet and newspaper
articles. For my primary research I will design and distribute a
questionnaire to discover people's views on Capital Punishment.
Questionnaire
I am a year 11 student at Aylward School. As part of my GCSE
Humanities course I am required to complete a Personal Research Study.
I would be great full therefore if you could complete the following
questionnaire.
1. What age group are you in?
[IMAGE][IMAGE][IMAGE]
15-19 20-29 30+
2. Have you ever been a victim of a crime?
[IMAGE][IMAG...
... middle of paper ...
...
Good for embarrassing subjects
No interviewer bias
The disadvantages of using a questionnaire are:
Low response rate
Difficult to go into depth
Never know if correct person answers
People may not be truthful
I have chosen not to use observation as one of my primary research
methods. I feel it is unsuitable for my PRS because it would be
impossible for me to observe Capital Punishment taking place or visit
Death Row and observe prisoners waiting for death. This wouldn't
benefit my study anyway.
I have also chosen not to use in-depth interviews because it takes a
long amount of time which I don't have, it doesn't have much use on
large amounts of people which I need for my PRS and the interviewer
may be biased towards the subject and would only follow up what they
think are important.
Many positions can be defended when debating the issue of capital punishment. In Jonathan Glover's essay "Executions," he maintains that there are three views that a person may have in regard to capital punishment: the retributivist, the absolutist, and the utilitarian. Although Glover recognizes that both statistical and intuitive evidence cannot validate the benefits of capital punishment, he can be considered a utilitarian because he believes that social usefulness is the only way to justify it. Martin Perlmutter on the other hand, maintains the retributivist view of capital punishment, which states that a murderer deserves to be punished because of a conscious decision to break the law with knowledge of the consequences. He even goes as far to claim that just as a winner of a contest has a right to a prize, a murderer has a right to be executed. Despite the fact that retributivism is not a position that I maintain, I agree with Perlmutter in his claim that social utility cannot be used to settle the debate about capital punishment. At the same time, I do not believe that retributivism justifies the death penalty either.
“This is not a nice man … innocent is not a word that suits him in any way,” says Brian Webster when speaking of Matthew Poncelet, the man on death row in the movie Dead Man Walking. Many people feel that the death penalty is immoral and it should not be used; however I feel completely opposite. I believe that capital punishment is a fair sentence for a murderer to receive. In the movie Dead Man Walking, the main character Matthew Poncelet, is on death row waiting for the lethal injection that will soon put him to death for good.
People often get caught up in the idea of capital punishment and what it means to others. For some individuals, it is a good feeling to see others suffer for their crimes. Meanwhile, others view the consequences as quite horrendous. I believe if an individual commits a serious crime, he or she should prepare to suffer the consequences. So strong is the desire to make others suffer for their crimes, we loose sight of what is right and wrong.
man from killing again then so be it. I don't know if it is immoral
murder rates in given areas both before and after an execution. Clear and cole(2000) have
The death penalty dates back to the eighteenth century. Criminals received many punishments throughout the centuries such as hangings, quartering, and burning at the stake. The death penalty consists of lethal injections today. The death penalty is a controversial topic because some people are for the death penalty and some people are against the death penalty. There is no one consensus for or against the death penalty. Although there have been many studies on the immorality of the death penalty and whether or not to limit the death penalty in some ways or just completely abolish it all together. It appears that more people are leading towards getting rid of the death penalty, but the courts want to keep it because the courts argue that that it is a successful fear tactic and may prevent future crimes. The death penalty is inhumane, biased, arbitrary, and an unsuccessful fear tactic so it should be abolished.
Murder is a crime whether you look at the Bible - Thou shalt not kill
One of the most controversial topics that affects the United States and other nations in
In my opinion capital punishment is wrong. The death penalty is the center of much debate in society. This is due, in part, to the fact that people see only the act of killing a criminal, and not the social effects the death penalty has on society as a whole. Upon reading about the death penalty, it was found to be an unethical practice. It promotes a violent and inhumane society in which killing is considered okay. Since there are alternatives, the death penalty should be abolished. Some people believe capital punishment to be cruel and unusual. Others believe that a person who kills, should themselves be killed. This statement alone raises the question, "How should they be killed?" The question that should really be asked is, "Should we kill at all?" Would it be morally correct to kill someone just because they have killed someone else?
Capital Punishment I recently read an article from the ACLU, written by Adam Bedau. It explained, quite eloquently, that for society to execute a murderer made society no better than the murderer himself. He said, “The executioner is no better than the criminal.” I was impressed by this moral stance, but I was surprised to read that he failed to apply this logic consistently. For example, the he went on to argue that life imprisonment would be a more appropriate penalty for murder than death. Using this ACLU logic, it appears that for our society to lock someone in a room against his will and not free him for a considerable length of time makes our society no better than the everyday kidnapper. But if an individual locked another up against his will, wouldn’t the ACLU view this as kidnapping. Being from the Methodist faith I found this argument somewhat difficult. For in the Bible there is a scripture that states, “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” I presume the ACLU would agree that beatings or torture are also unacceptable forms of punishment for crimes. They seem to be inhumane. Yet in Eastern cultures, if one steals something, they lose a finger or two and sometimes an entire hand depending on the severity of the crime. This seems to be reason enough not to steal, as in these cultures there is a very low theft rate. Maybe the ACLU would find a monetary fine a more appropriate punishment? For society to take money away from someone against his will without giving him any tangible goods in return would make society a thief. Of course, the Bedau also explains that capital punishment brutalizes society, leading to even more murders. If we, as a society, adopt this no-punishment position, it logically follows that there would be less crime. Once criminals realized that no matter what they did, no fellow citizen would lift a finger to stop them, why, they’d just be so overcome with the generosity of their neighbors that they’d naturally be inclined to become upstanding, productive citizens.
There are numerous way of conducting a study on death penalty but the right way should be researched ahead of time before conclusion are made. Proving current and accurate information on death penalty statistics should be researched based on new information found, using previous studies will only hurt the new research and provide false information to the public and the government’s database. Approaching the right subjects who fit the requirements for the study and have characteristics that carry out criminal behavior will provided the right statistics for the study.
Capital punishment is a very controversial subject in today’s world. People should think about what will happen to them if they commit a crime, and the consequences that will follow the crime. Society has enough problems to deal with without people committing crimes, Therefore capital punishment is desperately needed.
years. It has always been considered a relatively cheap and effective way to punish the
He is escorted down to a room with handcuffs on both arms and feet. The tension in the room causes nervousness and a stirring in his stomach, which entombs his dinner from the night before. He is told to take a seat. Still in doubt of his fate he notices the witnesses and their various expressions. His family is grief-stricken, a sharp contrast to the family of the brutally murdered, for which he was found guilty of. If only they knew what he knew; for they would not be strapping him into the chair, soaking a sponge, and placing it on top of his head along with the metal skullcap. If they knew the truth there would be someone in his place today. But alas, the truth dies along with the innocent.
Of the many questions available to base my survey on, I chose "Are you in favor of the death penalty?". With this question I interviewed twenty-four people. I had to get their name, age, race, sex, marital status, birthplace, religion, and of course the answer to the question. Then with the results of the survey I wrote this composition.