Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
proof of the existence of god
weaknesses of the teleological argument
proof of the existence of god
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: proof of the existence of god
Arguments for Existance of God
I have chosen the Christian religion to examine in this particular
piece of coursework. Over the centuries philosophers and theologians
have put forward a number of different arguments to argue the
existence of God. The particular arguments I will be looking at are
the Teleological Argument and the Cosmological Argument.
====================================================================
William Paley put the Teleological argument forward. This argument is
also known as the argument of Design and Purpose. He believed that
there was natural evidence in the world which supported the idea of a
divine designer whose aim was to produce such a supreme life form. The
world is too complex and far too detailed to have been made just by
chance that it has a designer. It argues against the Big Bang by
putting it into perspective and comparing the world with a watch. On a
smaller scale, it defines that if all the small pieces of a watch were
put in a tray and thrown up into the air, it isn't likely that all the
pieces would fall perfectly into place and the watch would work fully.
Therefore, how could the world (being the watch) just fall into place
as the Big Bang argument states? The world must have had a designer,
someone who planned and made the world, just like someone designed,
planned and made the watch. If you were to look at the world like the
watch, and think about how it had a designer to make it, you can
understand the Teleological Argument saying that the world is way too
complex to just appear from a bang. Even if you just take a hedgehog
for instance, even though they are very small, they ...
... middle of paper ...
... all. Here are some queries to think about when trying to find Gods
existence. In order to find a person, we need to find where the person
is. In order to contact something, we need to know the realm in which
that thing exists. Where is God? What realm is God living in? Where is
man? What realm is man living in? Is there a common realm in which the
two may meet?
So the question is can we prove that God exists? The answer is no, you
can't. Very few come to Christian faith through a process of logical
proof. We may believe very sincerely that God exists, but producing
proof is quite another matter and makes the matter of God being real
more impossible. It is nearly without dispute that everything that
exists is visible to physical eyes. So, if in fact God does truly
exist, he too should be visible to the eyes.
In conclusion I am left pretty much in the same place as I have started. It is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of God philosophically. For every philosopher who publishes his or her opinions on the subject, three more are there to tear it down. In the end I think it is best that man does not figure out the answer to this lifelong question. Some things are better left unanswered.
Roger White presents an interesting argument for why God must exist. In his argument, White states that everything in the world is finely tuned to live its life accordingly. In order for this to be possible, God must have finely tuned all beings so that they were well fit for life. In depth, this argument is, “If a fact stands in need of an explanation, and a hypothesis explains this fact better than anything else, then they support each other. Our universe being so perfect for life is a fact in need of explanation. The hypothesis that God has finely tuned everything to be where all living beings can exist in this universe is an explanation to this fact. No other hypothesis compares to such a standard as this one. Therefore, the fact that our
One of the most argued topics throughout human history is whether or not God exists. It is argued frequently because there are several different reasonings and sub arguments in this main argument. People who believe God exists argue how God acts and whether there is one or several. People who do not believe God exists argue how the universe became into existence or if it has just always existed. In this paper, I will describe Craig's argument for the existence of God and defend Craig's argument.
The Proof of the Existence of God There are many arguments that try to prove the existence of God. In this essay I will look at the ontological argument, the cosmological. argument, empirical arguments such as the avoidance of error and the argument from the design of the. There are many criticisms of each of these that would say the existence of God can’t be proven that are perhaps.
The Moral Argument for the Existence of God Kant did NOT put forward a moral argument and anyone who said he does is wrong!!!! Kant rejected all attempts to argue from the world to God, he regarded such an exercise as impossible. However he thought that God was a POSTULATE of practical reason. If you share Kant’s assumptions, then it becomes necessary to assume that there is a God.
Truth, what is truth? This question itself has a thousand answers, no person can ever be sure of what truth is rather, truth can be justified, it can checked for reliability with strong evidences and logic. If the evidence proves to be accurate then it can be established that a certain answer is the truth. However, have we ever tried to think about what intrigues us to seek the truth? To think about a question and set foot firmly on the path of knowledge. Definitely it has! That was the very cause itself which is why this world has witnessed some of the greatest philosophers like Aristotle, Plato and Socrates etc. along with the school of thought. The ability to think and reason is one of the greatest ability humans have, it is what distinguishes us from the animals. It is what gives us free will, the ability to control our own outcomes. However, it is that ability to ‘think’ itself which has caused men to rebel with the myths and statements established about the unseen and natural forces since the beginning of time. It gave rise to questions such as: Do aliens exist? Is there a world of the unseen? Life after Death and the most popular question since the beginning of times, Does God exists? And the answer is ‘yes’. Here is how I will justify my stance.
Based on how the deniers support their argument, one can deduce that they ought to be non-believers of God. Since there are no evidence that suggest God’s existence and religious leaders could have falsely created the belief for the purpose of power and status in society. This is a way of identifying the type of people who are anti-semitic, by applying there logic to other perspectives on life. If one would to be anti-semitic but believe in God, then there argument would have contradictions based the basis that makes them deny the Holocaust. It can be viewed that the motivation for Holocaust denial is to restore the Nazis’ image, so that the ideology of national socialism can be more acceptable. David Irving is a Holocaust denier, who strongly believes that the Holocaust is all made up. He was discredited as an historian and was accused for manipulating historical evidence. In one of his book, Hitler’s War, he illustrates Hitler as
Architect (God), then I consent to be called a fool." I as well can be
...nough to support the idea of God’s existence, I consider the debate to have no winner, because, the arguments of Dr. Dacey are also strong enough to prove his position. However, in these debates the double answer is not possible, because in reality the existence of God can be true of untrue, without anything in between. In my opinion, God exists, and I strongly believe in His existence. I consider the question “Does God Exist?” to be the issue of faith, and there cannot be true or false arguments, because all the people are willing to decide, whether they believe in existence of God, or not. It is the inner choice of everybody, and sooner or later we will all find out the truth.
Unlike a lot arguments for the existence of God, Pascal’s Wager requires a lot less faith than most of the other ways. You do not have to be born and raised in that religion, follow every custom strictly, or dedicate your life to the church. Pascal’s wager suggests that one needs to believe in God to receive the benefits of afterlife and that belief comes through practice. In response to people who do not believe in God, but want to, Pascal states, “Follow the way by which they [previous non-believers] began; acting as if they believed, taking the holy water, having masses said, etc. Even this will make you naturally believe, and deaden your acuteness” (Pensèes, 2). With many people often fearing deep involvement, this is a less drastic way
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument is an a priori argument. The arguments attempt to prove God's existence from the meaning of the word God. The ontological argument was introduced by Anselm of Canterbury in his book Proslogion. Anselm's classical argument was based on two principals and the two most involved in this is St Anselm of Canterbury as previously mentioned and Rene Descartes.
Instinctually, humans know that there is a greater power in the universe. However, there are a few who doubt such instinct, citing that logically we cannot prove such an existence. St. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, wrote of five proofs for the existence of God. The Summa Theologica deals with pure concepts; these proofs rely on the world of experience - what one can see around themselves. In these proofs, God will logically be proven to exist through reason, despite the refutes against them.
God can be defined as a being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions (1). There are many people that do not believe in any religion. People who do not believe in a religion have no reason for believing in a God. People who do not believe in a God and argue against the existence of God are proving something that is completely false. There is a God for numerous reasons.
From the discussion, it can be concluded that existence of God can be proved and developed by logical reasoning. They can be proved by seeking answers to our everyday questions like what can be bigger than our reason, who dictates solar system to act like an animate body. The evidence may not have physical existence but it is supported by the physical elements of nature.
There is a lot of argument about does God exist or not exist. It was