The Mytilene Debate and Athenian Debate

1590 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Argumentative essays

The book written by Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, contains two controversial debates between distinguished speakers of Athens. The two corresponding sides produce convincing arguments which can be taken as if produced as an honest opinion or out of self-interest. The two debates must be analyzed separately in order to conclude which one and which side was speaking out of honest opinion or self-interest, as well as which speakers are similar to each other in their approach to the situation. In the Mytilene Debate the two speakers are Creon, presenting the side in favor of killing the people, and Diodotus, on the opposing side. The two speakers present their opinions on the best way to deal with the Mytilenean people as a consequence after their revolt, as well as actions that should overall be taken in the future if history were to repeat itself. The two sides differ in that Creon wants justice for the revolt by completely terminating the Mytilenean men, whereas Diodotus considers the fact that the revolt might have been an Aact of calculated aggression@ and is willing to spare the lives of the Mytileneans. Creon accuses Athens as being weak if they forgive them, he stresses that if the Mytileans are not killed other cities will not fear the possibility of revolting against Athens: Afor it is a general rule of human nature that people despise those who treat them well and look up to those who make no concessions. Let them therefore have the punishment which their crime deserves.@ (p. 215, 38) He also argues that the same punishment should be enlisted on all the cities that betray Athens so that a consistency is apparent so that no city will think that they may escape the wrath of Athens that follows such a cr... ... middle of paper ... ...t their best interest is in the well-fair of Athens. Both these debates have a background question at hand, whether or not the speakers were presenting their opinions out of honest opinion for the well-being of Athens or self-interest. Out of the four speakers two (Nicias and Diodotus) honestly cared for the future of Athens and did not act on the slightest bit for their self-interest. Cleon also cared about the well-being of Athens but merely gave out the immoral and haste answer to a problem that obviously needed more thought to it. Alcibiades stands alone on this one, being the only one to have acted out of self-interest who only spoke to protect his name and gain a few points of honor here and there. Within the same book Thucydides presents two debates that ask the same question of the speakers where the answer apparently depends on the debate and the text.

Show More
Related

  • Just and Unjust Speech in Aristophanes' "Clouds"

    591 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout Aristophanes’ “Clouds” there is a constant battle between old and new. It makes itself apparent in the Just and Unjust speech as well as between father and son. Ultimately, Pheidippides, whom would be considered ‘new’, triumphs over the old Strepsiades, his father. This is analogous to the Just and Unjust speech. In this debate, Just speech represents the old traditions and mores of Greece while the contrasting Unjust speech is considered to be newfangled and cynical towards the old. While the defeat of Just speech by Unjust speech does not render Pheidippides the ability to overcome Strepsiades, it is a parallel that may be compared with many other instances in Mythology and real life.

    Read More

  • Stasis at Corcyra

    1402 Words  | 3 Pages

    The French Revolution, the American Civil War, the constant civil conflicts in certain parts of Africa in recent history and even today; these are all historical clashes of countrymen. They all also contain stories of immense atrocities. The violence, bloodshed, and ruthlessness that were seen throughout these events were appalling. They were made perhaps even more so by the fact that theses horrors were inflicted upon one another by countrymen, brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers. The civil war or stasis at Corcyra during the Peloponnesian War was no different. This paper will detail the events surrounding the conflict and attempt to give scope to it as a mirror into the rest of the conflict.

    Read More

  • Summary Of A War Like No Other By Victor Davis Hanson

    719 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his book “A War Like No Other” Victor Davis Hanson affirms that the truly devastating loss caused by the Peloponnesian war was not simply the loss of human life or economic collapse. The truly devastating loss was the halt of intellectual advancement and artistic achievement of a beautiful and richly cultured civilization. Hanson writes, “the cost was more in terms of the material surfeit and the intellectual energy of Greece that were depleted” (298). In this book, Hanson is not attempting to simply recount the events of the Peloponnesian war for the hundredth time. He wishes to display the humanity of the gruesome and long war, and show the real the war’s true cost was of intellectual wealth and advancement.

    Read More

  • Obituary Ancient Greece

    536 Words  | 2 Pages

    Of all the history of the Ancient Greece, there were two events that showed really well how disunity among the Greeks highly contributed to its downfall, which were the Peloponnesian War and Successors’ War. Interestingly, both wars occurred after a unity and followed by a unity that was carried out by “outsiders”. This may have actually shown that the Greeks had never learned from their past

    Read More

  • Pericles' Funeral Oration

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    Pericles’ Funeral Oration was a significant timestamp in 5th century Greece, Athens and to the Classical World. In the Funeral Oration, he discusses subjects such as the superiority of the Athenian compared to other civilisations. Pericles also expresses his views on the reputation of Athens while undermining Homer, and emphasizes his view on the role of the wives of fallen soldiers in the first year of the Peloponnesian war. The first recording known in history of his speech was written by Thucydides in his book ‘The Peloponnesian Wars’ as a statement on the values and characteristics of Athens. His speeches purpose was to show the people of Athens how great they were and much greater they could become. His wordings in the speech showed the classical world that Athens had no faults and was so great that no state could be compare to it, it made Athens as the centre of the world.

    Read More

  • Thucydides Rhetorical Analysis

    680 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thucydides expresses how a combination of fear and greed escalates in the rhetoric of two opposing camps to divide a nation through his focus on personalities. As an example, Thucydides provides the case of the Athenians' ally Corcyra, when civil war broke out during the Peloponnesian War. This precedent acts as a model of foreshadowing for the Athenians between Nicias and Alcibiades, as they attempt to sway the crowd using negative and positive examples about whether they should go to war with Sicily.

    Read More

  • Is Thucydides a Realist

    2634 Words  | 6 Pages

    ...sm, the security dilemma is never fully advanced as an adequate explanation of Athenian imperialism. Thucydides included human impulses such as self-interest and honour, rooted in human nature, as the necessary basis for the law of nature that the strong will dominate the weak. Combined, the expansion of power driven by honour, self-interest and the security dilemma "makes for a much more virulent realism," making the possibility of any common good remote, but not impossible. Thucydides emphasises the importance individual motivations have on political events and decisions; personal ambitions and fears have influence and are a driving force. However, he also highlights that man is morally aware, that he controls his own actions despite the permanent condition of his nature, and that rational action combines morality with expediency, not necessity with expediency.

    Read More

  • Opposing Viewpoints: Demosthenes and Isocrates Address Philip of Macedonia

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Demosthenes and Isocrates came to prominence in fourth century B.C.E. Athens as public speakers and as politicians. Isocrates was a teacher of rhetoric, or the art of public speaking, while Demosthenes was a professional litigator, writing speeches for clients arguing in the courts of law, and occasionally presenting arguments himself. Both men were highly respected citizens and opinion makers throughout the sphere of influence maintained by Athens, though they held opposing views regarding the proper course for Athenian government, warfare between the Greek city-states, and the prospect of invasion from the Persian Empire to the east. While the Greek city-states engaged in fratricidal warfare, Philip of Macedon began consolidation of his political power by essentially offering up his highly trained professional Macedonian army as mercenary soldiers to the various city-states requesting assistance or protection and demanding control as hegemon or monarch of the city-state in return for military aid. Following a declaration of truce, Philip would impose his rule upon the vanquished as well.

    Read More

  • Antigone And Creon

    468 Words  | 1 Pages

    good." I think that the fundamental issue that comes out of the work is the basic definition of what it means to place value on beliefs in a heterogeneous social order. It would be easier if the battle was between "good vs. bad," but where Hegel, and Sophocles, found tension and true tragedy was in the action of having to choose between two equally desirable, but ultimately incompatible courses of action. Prior to Creon's own renouncement of his stubbornness, there is an agonizing choice to be made. On one hand, there is Creon with the word of the law as representing justice. On the other hand, Antigone presents her conception of justice as transcending the law. Both carry significant implications that have to cause some level of pause within the reader/ audience. If we validate Creon as being right, then it speaks to the absolute certainty of the political and social order, an order of individuals as carrying transcendent quality to it. If we validate Antigone, then it speaks to the idea that anyone is able to raise question to this system, and bring doubt into a realm where certainty is needed. At the same time, if we validate both characters, we also sanction the pain caused to those who have the unfortunate distinction of being in love with them. These characters become collateral damage in the tragic drama between two competing notions of the good. It is here where tragedy is evident. For this reason, I would have to see Hegel's view as one consistent with Classical tragedy, forcing agony and pain out of choice, and being the direct purpose of Sophocles in the construction of the

    Read More

  • Melian Dialogue as interpreted through perspectives of Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism

    1175 Words  | 3 Pages

    As perspectives and opinions in the realm of political science are fluid and bound to change, he receives a variety of replies, for the representatives body he sent happen to comprise a Realist, a Liberal and a Constructivist. The variances the philosophies and universal laws his representatives throw back at him intrigue General Cleomedes. He recognizes that within the power play of the world, and the role of Athens as a superpower within the world’s political arena, he must be thoroughly versed in every possible political perspective. Thus, he invites his representatives to share their own view of what transpired between the dialogue between the Melians and the Athenians.

    Read More

  • The Source of Conflict between Antigone and Creon in Sophocles' Antigone

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the following paper, I plan to discuss the source of conflict between the title characters of Antigone and Creon in Sophocles’ “Antigone”. I also plan to discuss how each character justifies his or her actions and what arguments they give for their justifications. I will also write about the strengths and weaknesses of these arguments. The final points I try to make are about who Sophocles thinks is right and who I think is right.

    Read More

  • James Dashner's Maze Runner

    926 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "Peloponnesian War (ancient Greek History)."Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, 24 Dec. 2013. Web. 05 Apr. 2014

    Read More

  • The Causes and Effects of the Peloponnesian War

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    The causes of the Peloponnesian War proved to be too great between the tension-filled stubborn Greek city-states of Athens and Sparta. As Thucydides says in Karl Walling’s article, “Never had so many human beings been exiled, or so much human blood been shed” (4). The three phases of the war, which again, are the Archidamian war, the Sicilian Expedition and the Decelean war, show the events that followed the causes of the war, while also showing the forthcoming detrimental effects that eventually consumed both Athens and eventually Sparta effectively reshaping Greece.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of Thucydides' Views on the Melian Dialogue

    1591 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thucydides believed that the Athenians had the stronger argument. Proof of this lies in the way Thucydides picked the arguments for each side. For the moment, we will disregard the actual content of the arguments, and look at argumentation forms and the flow of the debate.

    Read More

  • Ismene's Indecisiveness in Sophocles' Antigone Antigone essays

    1521 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to Thucydides, Athenians value decisiveness and swift action, preferring to act toward a goal rather than waiting for something to happen.  An example of these values can be found in the Corinthian speech to the Spartan assembly in Book I Chapter 70.  The characteristics of the Spartans are in sharp contrast to the Athenian ideals.  The Spartans are described by the Corinthians as too inactive and passive, always waiting for something to happen instead of acting beforehand.  While Creon and Antigone are distinctly separated in their beliefs, in how they handle their beliefs they are very similar.  This clearly defines Antigone and Creon in the play as characters acting more in the way thought to be Athenian, and Ismene in a manner much more typical of the Spartans.  The characters' different approaches to the situation encapsulate the conflict of ideals that is about to take place with the Peloponnesian war.

    Read More

More about The Mytilene Debate and Athenian Debate

Open Document