Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
importance of managerial role
milton friedman contributions to economics
milton friedman contributions to economics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: importance of managerial role
The Evolution of the Corporation
The Evolution of the Corporation
In a capitalist society where the growth and power of corporations are ever evolving it is critical to determine the effects and consequences this evolution brings upon the business world. The Stockholder Theory maintains that managers should act merely as agents to the stockholder and only serve their interests-the maximization of profits (45). Milton Friedman's argument being, they are the owners of the business, and hence they should be entitled to all profits (45). Although this simple profit-motive concept may achieve the desired result, and address all of the interests of the stakeholders it lacks compassion that is so prevalent, and in my opinion superior, in the following theory.
In Edward Freeman's A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation he suggests a transformation of the corporate system by replacing the notion that managers have a duty to stockholders with the concept that managers bear a fiduciary relationship to stakeholders (56). In its narrow definition stakeholders refer to customers, suppliers, management, owners, employees and the local community- those that are vital to the survival and success of the corporation. This direct approach of focusing on the interests of all those that are vital to its survival embraces all of the elements that have evolved in our society as a result of the absence of direct concern or lack of morality for the stakeholders in the Stockholders Theory.
Over the years, the sole pursuit of managerial capitalism, the basis of the Stockholder Theory, in its unconstrained manner through deception and manipulation has resulted in the promulgation of laws to protect the interests of stakeholders...
... middle of paper ...
...others takes precedent over ourselves? Some of us would like to think so but this is a topic for another paper.
Works Cited
Beachamp, Tom L., and Norman Bowie (eds). Ethical Theory and Business. 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
Freeman, Edward R. and William E. Evans, A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. Business Ethics Quarterly 3/4. (1988 and 1993): 55-65. In Beachamp, Tom L., and Norman Bowie (eds). Ethical Theory and Business. 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall,
Friedman, Milton. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970: 50-55. In Beachamp, Tom L., and Norman Bowie (eds). Ethical Theory and Business. 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
Evan, William M. and Edward R. Freeman. “A Stakeholder Theory of The Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism.” Advanced College Essay: Business and Its Publics. Ed. Pat C. Hoy II and Denice Martone. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002. 329-38.
Bratton, W.W. & Wachter, M.L. (2008). Shareholder primacy's corporist origins: Adolf Berle and the modern corporation. Journal of Corporation Law, 34 (1): 99-152.
In the Introduction of the article of the author Lynn A. Stout pointed out the two arguments in regard to shareholder primacy that were made by Adolph A. Berle and Merrick Dodd.
Wagner-Tsukamoto, S. 2007. Moral agency, profits and the firm: Economic revisions to the Friedman theorem. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 209–220.
Freeman, R. E.: 2002. Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation, in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
The idea behind stakeholder theory is that it’s all about making the stakeholder which is the group that has a stake in the company , better off. In this model, corporate responsibility involves anyone who has direct ties to the company. For example, as an employee you are responsible to do things such as “...follow the instructions of management most of the time, to speak favorably about the company, and to be responsible citizens in the local communities in which the company operates.” In return for this form of loyalty and their labor, the company is expected to do things such as be there for them during hard times and other standard employee benefits such as wages and security. The whole idea behind corporate responsibility in this theory is that who you have a responsibility to becomes wider if you focus on the stakeholders. This could work if it wasn’t for the fact that even if you get something out of being invested, sometimes that isn’t enough. For example, if you work for a company and you catch your CEO doing some shady stuff. As an employee, you’re invested in whether or not this company continues to thrive under the current CEO. But your loyalty isn’t deserved if the company is engaging in morally questionable behavior. This idea of corporate responsibility fails when applied to real life scenarios in companies that might engage in misconduct or unethical practices.
Many organisations have come to understand both theories and over time have adapted to using Freeman’s stakeholder theory. However, according to Sen and Cowley (2012), it is known that stakeholder theorists neither oppose Friedman’s idea of profit maximisation, nor defend the opinion that managers only have ethical obligations towards shareholders. These two theories are adopted differently according to the organisation. This is to ensure that whichever theory the organisation obeys, it will allow for the company to benefit instead of lose out to other
Nowadays, corporation should deal with number of norms and laws because it is accepted a legal person. In case, the corporation breaches the law or does not act in benefit of the shareholders, stakeholders, employees, suppliers and society, it can be suited. Scholars believe that there are some theories that can be used for preventing businesses. Two of the most debated theories are stakeholder theory and shareholder theory.
In this essay we are taking a look at the famous Milton Friedman's essay "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profit ". The following paper is an attempt to critically evaluate the article in consideration of Freeman Stakeholder Theory.
In today's business world, companies are forced to make quick decisions involving large amounts of capital and labor. The risk involved in such decisions is substantial, as firm leaders are forced to constantly evaluate their company's position and search for new ways of updating developments. Normally when facing financial crisis, a corporation's solution is reducing input costs while increasing its output volume by implementing cost-cutting strategies such us outsourcing or laying off employees. Every corporation is different and has its own unique corporate culture so cost-cutting may not be the most appropriate solution to each company¡¦s problems. A successful corporation should always put the shareholders in priority as any company's policy changing or decision making may significantly affect the shareholders' right. Who are the shareholders? They are the customers, employees, and stockholders who are the important human factors to decide the success or failure of an organization.
Stakeholders are those groups or individual in society that have a direct interest in the performance and activities of business. The main stakeholders are employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers, financiers and the local community. Stakeholders may not hold any formal authority over the organization, but theorists such as Professor Charles Handy believe that a firm’s best long-term interests are served by paying close attention to the needs of each of these stakeholders. The modern view is that a firm has responsibilities to all its stakeholders i.e. everyone with a legitimate interest in the company. These include shareholders, competitors, government, employees, directors, distributors, customers, sub-contractors, pressure groups and local community. Although a company’s directors owes a legal duty to the shareholders, they also have moral responsibilities to other stakeholder group’s objectives in their entirely. As a firm can’t meet all stakeholders’ objectives in their entirety, they have to compromise. A company should try to serve the needs of these groups or individuals, but whilst some needs are common, other needs conflict. By the development of this second runway, the public and stakeholders are affected in one or other way and it can be positive and negative.
Strenghtening of shareholder’s right in term of a greater incentive and ability to monitoring management. These rights will bring a justice and legal protections from unethical managers. For example, the shareholders may bring a punishment toward a managers by loss of employment or reduce in the salaries of the manager.
Although primary objective for managers is to maximise shareholders’ wealth, but many firms are started to focus on other stakeholders’ interests in recent years. Company can prevent transfer the damage of stakeholders’ wealth to shareholders when focus on stakeholders’ interests. In other words, “social responsibility” for the companies is to maintenance stakeholders’ relations in order to provide long-term interests to shareholders. By this way, conflict, turnover and litigation of stakeholders can be minimise. Obviously, company can achieve their primary objective by cooperation with stakeholders instead of conflict with stakeholders (Smart, Megginson, Gitman, 2002).
In other words, directors need to act in good faith in the best interest of the company. However, once shareholders delegated their power to directors there was another issues, whether directors should act in the best interests of shareholders only, or focus on the interests of other stakeholders? So, whose interests should be promoted by the directors? Some scholars believe that the focus should be made on stakeholders, as they are under the risk of the firms` actions; they contribute to the company ‘some form of capital, human or financial, something of value, in a firm’. So, corporations should be responsible toward stakeholders. However, stakeholders is a wide range of interests that should be accounted, and when corporation is responsible to everyone it means that they are not responsible to anyone, and this theory can lead to the meaningless of the corporate governance. This happens because company is focused not on the achieving of long-term objectives, but on the customers, employees etc. instead. Notwithstanding, it does not also mean that company should act and be accountable only in respect of shareholders who delegate them the governance of the company. From the point of shareholder primacy, the primary aim of corporations is to focus on the company and be accountable to shareholders, and thus focus ‘on stakeholders only to the extent that this is required by law and by concerns for the firm`s reputation, credibility and image’. So, Enlightened Shareholder Theory stands for the rejection of shareholder primacy (the effect of the shareholder theory can be seen from the Enron crisis where managers were required to increase profit to shareholders and, thus it encouraged managers to make manipulations with accounts of the company) and focus on other stakeholders` interests
...ve the company profits, and under a legal framework established by the federal government to control the acceptable business behavior that somewhat affects the society. On the other hand, the second model, suggested by Edward Freeman, is the stakeholder theory or the wide view that generates the opposite idea of socially responsible behavior of a corporation. The theory argues that the shareholders-centered idea is incomplete, since there are stakeholders, who are affected by a business decision and also can affect a corporation involved (Fassin, 2012). By definition, according to Beauchamp et al. (2009, p.61), the parties, which have a stake; an investment, benefit, any claims for considerations or influences in the activities that make up the business are defined as stakeholders. This includes stockholders, employees, customers, managers, suppliers, local community