Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
corruption and influence fiction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: corruption and influence fiction
Glasgow 5 March 1971 by Edwin Morgan
‘Glasgow 5 March 1971’ is a poem by Edwin Morgan which creates a
picture of a corrupt figure, but in a way the corrupt figure can be
seen as a hero if we look at the poem in the corrupt figures point of
view, but generally no one would classify the corrupt figures of being
heroes.
The poem ‘Glasgow 5 March 1971’ is an instamatic poem, where the poet
approaches to give an insight into the violent reality of the inner
city life. From the title we see that it is informal and conveys the
image of a headline report, to give a prosaic note of time and place.
But not only has the headline given us this feeling, as it seems like
a written report of the incident the way the poet has not involved
himself in the poem, but conveys the idea of someone standing back
watching the incident or someone that knows the young couple, besides
that the present tense is used to give immediacy.
The poem can be split into three parts, as there are three couples
involved. The beginning of the poem shows us the young couple are
passing by maybe looking at diamond engagement rings, when suddenly
they are used as human bricks by two young attackers, and fall
backwards into the shop window, suffering the start to bad pain and
injuries. While the two attackers continue to go ahead and snatch what
they can from this shop. At the meantime the two drivers passing by,
focusing on the road ahead trying to avoid the situation, and don’t
bother helping. This shows two corrupt figures, the drivers and the
attackers.
Firstly, the attackers can be classified as corrupt figures due to the
way they have treated the young couple as it disgusts us:
“The two youths who have pushed them
are about to c...
... middle of paper ...
...ves why are they? But the incident was
caused by the attackers.
The poet makes use of irony throughout the poem which gives us a
clearer image of the poem as it shows how fast the poem is going with
the violence and the pictures are moving about in our mind.
In conclusion the poet has created the attackers to be corrupt as they
stand out and we do have a reaction towards them. But throughout the
poem the poet shows us all kinds of techniques but at the very last
line of the poem Edwin Morgan reveals the message across to us. It
makes us wonder about the society we live in, where things happen and
are ignored and gives us a brief insight to the violence in the inner
city and such ignorance people have. In fact, the last line is very
much thought provoking, as why are the drivers so ignorant as well as
that it makes us think about the world around us.
This stanza feels dream like, the organization of thought is loose, and word choice seems almost erratic, almost unrehearsed. The first stanza ends with a twist. The faster boy is killed by a mine and his friend, just seconds behind, witnesses the whole thing.
Opposed to that of common thought, superman is not the only type of character that fits the heroic persona. Although “superheroes” typically come to mind when one thinks of a hero, there are many other ordinary people capable of extraordinary things. A hero is a person who takes the initiative to set out on a journey of internal growth. During this symbolic journey, one truly finds himself and betters the lives of other mentally and physically. In Homer’s epic poem The Odyssey, Odysseus takes the path of heroism, resulting in the reborn spirit of a selfless, modest hero. During the process, Odysseus is faced with many challenges that he must overcome in order to earn the noble title. Odysseus proves himself to be a well-deserving hero because he is intelligent with his decisions, he displays cleverness, and he rids himself of hubris.
In many works of Literature, a character comes forth as a hero, only to die because of a character trait known as a tragic flaw; Hamlet from Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Okonkwo from Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, and Winston Smith from Orwell’s 1984 all exhibit that single trait, which leads, in one way or another, to their deaths. These three tragic heroes are both similar and different in many ways: the way they die, their tragic flaws, and what they learn. All three characters strongly exhibit the traits needed to be classified as a tragic hero.
Hatto, A. T., gen. ed. "Heroes and Heroines." Traditions of Heroic and Epic Poetry. Volume Two: Characteristics and Techniques. London: The Modern Humanities Research Association, 1989.
bravery during many different instances in the poem, it?s quite obvious to the reader who
When tales of heroes are so grandiosely told through poems and stories often too wild to be real, the emphasis of heroism is shown through their journeys rather than their characteristics. They are in terms heroes without any real humane flaw; through the analysis of these two tales it’s, apparent that they share many similarities in the themes, but the traits of the protagonists and the reasonings behind the choices they made until their demise were entirely different. In these pieces of literature the villains are also in a limelight of their own, making one question, “Who was actually in the right all along? Who’s really to blame?” The antagonists are as infamous as the protagonist themselves are famous like a balancing act; only one of equal prowess can take down another. Items of value, recognition, and the art of gifting are shared through these epic poems but are the heroes in accepting them, the same?
When people think of a hero, they picture someone flawless, someone who does no wrong. A hero is humble and is recognized for constantly saving people in dangerous situations. But that is not realistic. Heroes have flaws, and they do not always make the right choices, but they are still heroes because their courageous actions outweigh their rather dishonorable ones. This topic is discussed in the epic poem, The Odyssey by Homer. Odysseus does not always fit his image as god-like, but he is still very much a hero because he has respectable morals and he protects those in need of protection.
...y did not create a typical hero in his protagonist; one who wins a certain battle and is recognized as victorious. Instead, he created one who succeeds by being defeated, or by dying. However, because many people did not understand what he did, that he "died for life", it was not necessarily considered noble. He was defeated personally, but the reason he died was worth far more than his personal gain.
...s suffering. Royalty, goodness, and flaws are his full persona: no other intense personality traits shine through the shelled example of Oedipus. Well-constructed and complex, he has lasted the tests of time. Tragic heroes are wholly present in all famous literature. From Romeo and Juliet to Oedipus Rex, to Gatsby to Victor Frankenstein to Spiderman, tragic heroes are constantly found throughout human creation. They thrive on the idea that we control little beyond our own actions, which is a topic that humans have related to for millennia. Without these tragedies for humans to relate back to and reassure themselves, media as an entity would not be as popular today. Tragic heroes are morbidly fascinating, relatable, and provoking, lasting through years and connecting to an inner part within the entire human race. All of us have an inner tragedy, a tragic hero or not.
...of gentle and kindness shows that Odysseus is not a hero. His way of supporting ideas that favor him most portrays him as non-heroic and his true picture is also revealed by his selfishness and mercilessness.
In other words, he is not a tragic hero, but rather a misfortuned hero that
Heroes are often described as physically attractive, strong, intelligent figures with a flair for grand gestures,and an eloquent knack for stringing words together. The fundamental aspects of what defines a hero are conveniently glazed over. People forget that heroes often lead lives of quiet determination. When they have an idea, a goal they want to accomplish, they ignite a spark within themselves that burns into an uncontrollable blaze, which that can only be tamed by success. The fabricated image of a hero has been so deeply rooted into society that the quiet heroes in literature, such as Jefferson from A Lesson Before Dying, are often forgotten, or the misdeeds of cowards such as Frankenstein are overlooked. Jefferson is the literary foil for Victor Frankenstein, because he has strongly built morals that enable him to become a hero, whereas Victor Frankenstein is a weak willed and indecisive character. A hero is defined by their ability to go through with a task despite the obstacles that lie in their way, along with their courage and ultimately, they accept any responsibility that may befall them.
...his not a tragic hero because he not outstanding and virtuous, and he does not achieve insightful recognition or redemption.
Insistence upon the rank of the tragic hero, or the so-called nobility of his character, is re...
The concept of tragic hero is very important in the construction of tragedy. It is the main cause of pity and fear. The tragic hero is a character between the two extremes; he is neither virtuous nor evil. At the same time, this character is better than the ordinary men or audience, he has some good qualities. Moreover, as a tragic hero, he is moving from happiness to misery by his downfall at the end. In fact, this downfall is caused by an error or a flaw in his character not by a vice or depravity. Another feature in the tragic hero is that he has good reputation and he is a man of prosperity. It can be said that Oedipus is a tragic hero because he has all the previous mentioned characteristics and the whole play is a classical application of this concept.