Arguments Against Predictive Profiling

3317 Words7 Pages

The need to defend nation from terrorist attacks is a daily struggle. We have improved our security in airports, public and government building, sporting events and venues were large crowds are present. We have put protective measures in our theaters, schools, and places of worship. It doesn’t seem to be enough to add security personnel, metal detectors and body scanners. Terrorists still find ways to get passed the toughest security measures in place and cause mass casualties and destruction worldwide. Seidenstat argues that security is a relative thing and that no set of policies or measures can eliminate all terrorist acts (Seidenstat 2009 ,4). Terrorists will stop at nothing to foil our defenses. They are very patient and creative in …show more content…

Predictive Profiling can assist security forces in identifying individuals who are engaged in surveillance activities, intelligence gathering, theft, or some other criminal activity as well. Predicting Profiling requires security forces to be vigilant. It is a technique that can be implemented to prevent or mitigate a threat before the actual attack occurs. Race cannot be the only means of profiling. If race is a factor the enemy can easily use this type of profiling against us. All they would have to do is use individuals that don’t fit the racial profile to defeat a security system based on racial or ethnic makeup. Predictive Profiling is not limited to preventing hijackings. Law enforcement agencies around the world have recognized the effectiveness of predictive profiling and use it on the job all the time. Police officers use suspicious indicators or behaviors as cues to what’s about to happen and to prevent crimes from happening. They make situational assessments and conduct behavior observations as part of their every daily life. This is what helps them prevent crime and could ultimately save their lives and the lives of

More about Arguments Against Predictive Profiling

Open Document