Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
health care turmoil in the united states
comparison of health care systems
comparing healthcare systems around the world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: health care turmoil in the united states
If there’s one thing that Democrats and Republicans agree on, it’s that our health care system is in shambles. It’s the laughingstock of the civilized world, to be perfectly honest. The World Health Organization, part of the United Nations, ranks the United States 37th overall, just ahead of Slovenia and Cuba, and right behind Dominica and Costa Rica. That’s right, ladies and gentlemen; the World Health Organization ranks the mighty United States just above communist Cuba. In political science, there is a term called the iron triangle. The best example is the current defense setup in the United States. The three players are the defense contractors, the Department of Defense, and US Senators on defense spending committees. The DoD goes to the contractors as a whole saying they need a new model airplane. This spending has to be approved by a Senate committee. So, these contractors, in order to get the absurdly big contracts, work with senators in backdoor deals to create jobs in their states in exchange for passing the spending. The biggest loser: taxpayers. The health care industry is eerily similar. The three major players are pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, and insurance companies. The pharmaceutical companies charge insanely high prices on their drugs, so that they can make more money. This price, however, is largely covered by your insurance. Hospitals, meanwhile, broker deals with these same companies for appropriate rates. The insurance companies then raise their rates in accordance, but add a bit more to the top. The biggest loser: anyone concerned about their health. Do you want your health in the middle of that triangle? Unfortunately for us, the health care providers are in the pockets of the people with the pow... ... middle of paper ... ...it will cause massive spending are also not aware of the facts. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, a robust plan including the public option will actually reduce the deficit. I’m not alone. In fact, Reuters released a poll in December with a startling fact: 60% of Americans want a public option. Nearly every poll released by a non partisan agency showed that the majority of Americans do want a public option. The problem: most Democrats on the Hill don’t believe the numbers. Why? Because their campaigns are funded by these health care companies to the tune of $550 million per year. Personally, I think that a single-payer system would be the best health care system this country can have. For now, however, a public option will suffice. It’s not perfect. But it’s far better than the current proposal, and centuries better than what we have now.
During the study of various reforms that were proposed and denied, both the GOP and Democrats attempted to find a balance that would guarantee the success of their proposals. Years of research, growing ideologies, political views and disregard for the country's constitution sparked an array of alternatives to solve the country's healthcare spending. The expenditure of US healthcare dollars was mostly due to hospital reimbursements, which constitute to 30% (Longest & Darr, 2008). During the research for alternatives, the gr...
In conclusion, there still needs to be a lot of work done to health care in the United States. Other nations provide universal health care to their citizens, but this would cause dilemmas in balancing two often conflicting policy goals: providing the public with equitable access to needed pharmaceuticals while controlling the costs. Universal health care probably would not work in the U.S. because our nation is so diverse and our economy is so complex. The system we have now obviously has its problems, and there is a lot of rom for improvement. HMO’s will still create problems for people and their medical bills, but they definitely should be monitored to see that their patients are receiving just treatment.
Every other country in the world that is on the same level as America industrially and developmentally offers universal health care to its citizens. Some Americans are worried about the rise in taxes if the government offers guaranteed care to everyone. The insurance companies will suffer, as well. But the sacrifice is more than worth it.
It is time for all Americans to stand up and step out of the baby stage, where they let government do everything for them, and tell those government officials exactly what we need and how we need it done. Government has made a mockery of the U.S. Economy so far. When a communist country looks at the United State of America and asks what the heck we are doing, it is past time for us Americans to get something done. It is time for this economy to turn around and for the government to step down from their attempts to overstep their boundaries, such as the attempts they are making with this healthcare idea. Cutting down a government run healthcare bill is the first step in getting the economy headed in the right direction and the goals of Americans accomplished, so that we can go back to living the American Dream.
The U.S. expends far more on healthcare than any other country in the world, yet we get fewer benefits, less than ideal health outcomes, and a lot of dissatisfaction manifested by unequal access, the significant numbers of uninsured and underinsured Americans, uneven quality, and unconstrained wastes. The financing of healthcare is also complicated, as there is no single payer system and payment schemes vary across payors and providers.
While most countries around the world have some form of universal national health care system, the United States, one of the wealthiest countries in the world, does not. There are much more benefits to the U.S. adopting a dorm of national health care system than to keep its current system, which has proved to be unnecessarily expensive, complicated, and overall inefficient.
A universal healthcare system is a great idea in theory, but in actuality, no one has figured out a reasonable proposal for where the money should come from. Economists claim that more than 2 trillion dollars are spent on health care each year. That’s over $6,000 per person. It would be reasonable to assume that universal health care would cause the already grand cost of health care in the United States to increase even more. The most likely outcome is that taxpayers would have to pay into a large pool from which everyone would draw for their health needs. This would create several problems. First, it would raise taxes for everyone. It would also mean, fundamentally, that many people who choose a healthy lifestyle would be required to pay the same amount as people who choose to live an unhealthy lifestyle, which hardly seems fair. Finally, a universal healthcare system could lead to huge increases in unemployment. All of the Americans who are currently employed with private insurance companies could suddenly find themselves without work. Government regulation could lead to decreased salaries for doctors. This hardly seems like a more
Considering there is no finalized legislative bill for a public option, I am not able to provide a truly accurate assessment of this issue. Hence, in this paper I evaluate a few likely scenarios. I argue in favor of adding a public option as part of a comprehensive healthcare reform. The U.S. healthcare is very complex and requires significant improvements to address key issues, such as healthcare spending. The addition of a public option can be beneficial if it is carefully constructed and coupled with other policies to ensure a more sustainable healthcare system.
...s quite a smart idea for us to having something as a backup plan because who knows what could potentially happen if we don’t have it where can lead to a serious turmoil. But let’s be real clear on this every American needs Health Insurance Despite the circumstances of what it can have on everyone we should have it reguardless.If the Companies are willing to provide a less expensive one then what’s the reason to overcharge us for it.in all honestly The Healthcare companies want individuals to choose what they feel is best for them and what it can offer for support in giving them the right benefits to obtain for their life. Why should American settle for less when they can settle better to have the best.as individuals we need to understand that its healthcare Companies is not based on the name it’s all about what you’re able to afford and how much can it cover in orde
Like many college students I have to pinch pennies to make it through school. Every last penny counts when budgeting my monetary supply. As a result of this I have found that I do not have enough to spare to pay for health insurance. Unlike most college students I am over the age of 23 and thus not covered by my parents insurance. Since I am only employed part time I am also not able to obtain it from work. This puts me in the company of the more than 42 million Americans who do not have health insurance. It is past time that the United States join the rest of the industrialized countries that have already decided to provide their citizens with health care. I believe a single payer health care system is necessary. A national health care system would provide a number of benefits. To begin with, it would cut the overall costs of health care. Secondly it would actually decrease bureaucracy by removing the many layers of insurance paper work patients and physicians are forced to go through in our current system. Finally it would increase life expectancy by allowing more money conscious Americans to receive adequate prevention instead of waiting until an illness becomes worse. All of these reasons point towards a national health care program as being the solution we need. Some opponents of single payer sytems, mostly financed by insurance companies that stand to lose billions from such a plan, point to some of the other countries that have enacted such plans as an advisory against our following suit. However they fail to take into account some of the methods unique to those countries and overstate some of the problems while ignoring our own.
The problem in America is the health care crisis. We all fear government ran programs and operations so we are all reluctant to allow this government aided system into our nation. We all wonder how we spend the most amount of money on health care than any other nation and our quality of care is not as high as them other nations. Next year our health care cost is expected to escalate to 4$ trillion dollars. The quality of health care still remains low. In the United States there are high number of people that do not have insurance at all. There are also people paying ridiculous prices for insurance it all has created a modern day crisis and a highly debeated topic in America.
The US health system has both considerable strengths and notable weaknesses. With a large and well-trained health workforce, access to a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, patient outcomes are among the best in the world. But the US also suffers from incomplete coverage of its population, and health expenditure levels per person far exceed all other countries. Poor measures on many objective and subjective indicators of quality and outcomes plague the US health care system. In addition, an unequal distribution of resources across the country and among different population groups results in poor access to care for many citizens. Efforts to provide comprehensive, national health insurance in the United States go back to the Great Depression, and nearly every president since Harry S. Truman has proposed some form of national health insurance.
I also know that the issue hangs in the balance of our elected leaders while citizens and providers sit and wait. We wait and we wait and we wait some more. Meanwhile, my personal health insurance coverage has increased by a little more than 300% per month in the last 24 months with a higher deductible and less coverage. I repeat, 300% increase PER MONTH just for the premium. This does not include the higher copays for office visits and never mind the gargantuan annual deductible. Many of my peers have chosen to forego coverage due to this. American citizens who are electing to decline coverage because of these costs are being penalized by a tax because of that choice. How is it possible to be taxed on something because you can’t afford it? Alternatively, some people are choosing to accept the penalty because it’s more economical for them. So basically, you’re darned if you do and darned if you don’t. There are rumbles in the health care community about physicians and providers no longer wanting to provide care or closing their practices altogether. I personally have experienced this. One of my physicians close her private practice merely because it costs more to keep her office open than what she was being reimbursed for by insurance. Additionally, I have experienced many patients over the recent years that have had to cease having treatment or not receive the full extent of their treatment plan because they can’t afford it. It is
As mentioned in the previous paragraph, many Americans are currently too frightened to visit the doctor or get treatment because of its costs. Health insurance costs an astronomical amount to many in the United States. Zac Auter, an analyst at Gallup, notes that a surprisingly large amount of Americans actually do not have health insurance—in fact, about 12 percent of Americans are left without any form of health insurance (Auter). Furthermore, according to a study done in 2009, Americans without insurance have a 40% higher risk of death—this number is 15% higher than a study done in 1993 (Cecere). This shows that the number could likely continue to rise, or simply that more Americans now are uninsured. A lot of this could be remedied through a single-payer system, which could set in motion preventative healthcare for those who find themselves currently unable to afford private health insurance or for those who do not have everything covered by Medicare. Unfortunately, 12% of Americans is a shockingly large number, proving that far too many people currently find themselves stuck in a situation like the aforementioned. Secondly, looking towards other countries proves that having a single-payer system leads to more lives being saved. The United States is already behind other countries in potentially preventable deaths through universal
It is interesting with how different America’s health care is from everyone else in the world. Most are universal, required to have health care. We are trying to accomplish that in America, but many don’t like being taxed if they don’t have it. There definitely is a lot we can learn from other countries. Overall Switzerland has a great system set up, with the United Kingdom behind them. Japan is also on track. America is definitely trying to make head way, and eventually will. It all comes down to weighing what is most important, cost, quality, or access to health care.