Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
observation at preschool for ages 4-5.
observation at preschool for ages 4-5.
observation at preschool for ages 4-5.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: observation at preschool for ages 4-5.
Observational taxonomy as it relates to the nature of early social interaction, is a classification system that uses a code of different behaviors that are seen when observing children during play and non-play and is further divided into cognitive and social categories.
Amongst the many theorists, Mildred Parten and Jean Piaget are significant to the field of early observational studies comprising of children in the free play atmosphere. Parten asserted that social participation amongst preschool aged children amplified as the child’s age increased (Parten 1932). To support her logic she categorized play into six distinct categories of social participation which include unoccupied behavior, solitary play, onlooker behavior, parallel play, associative play and cooperative play (Parten 1932). In particular, Parten designates solitary play as the child who plays away from other children at a distance of 3 feet or greater. For instance, this can be depicted through a scenario where there are a group of kids playing with a ball and a single child sitting away from this crowd is intermingling simply with a doll. Conversely, parallel play as emphasized by Parten is when a child plays self-sufficiently, yet comes within feet of the others while practicing a similar if not the same act. Furthermore, Parten describes group play as when children all play collectively for a mutual intent. By carefully studying and understanding these social play to a great extent, one can see that there is certainly an overlap between social and cognitive play. Parten observed that parallel play begin from 2 ½ to 3 ½ years and associative play from 3 ½ to 4 ½. Contrasting Parten, Piaget a cognitive theorist strongly proclaimed that play was based on the sens...
... middle of paper ...
...d controlling to her classmates. She ran ahead one of them and got a piece of tape. Similarly, Robert when told to clean up and go to the carpet becomes rebellious by intentionally dropping the glue and laughing which he was told not to do in the beginning.
The difference between Robert and Ariel in my perception could be as a result of maturity and culture. We learn from Parten that the older children get the more socially incline they become. Culture plays an important role in the development of socializing behaviors in children. According to Piaget’s cognitive theory children learn what they see. It is through our culture that we learn how girls are to behave and how boys are to behave. It is also when we acquire what the norms are for our culture. The culture aspect to socialization is the key aspect to development in every human being during the early years.
Early Childhood is marked by a time in children’s lives when they develop “a confident self-image, more effective control over their emotions, new social skills, the foundations of morality, and a clear sense of themselves as boy or girl” (Berk, Kauffman & Landrum, 2011, pg. 45). According to Erik Erikson, early childhood is a period of “vigorous unfolding,” one where children have a sense of autonomy and a new sense of purposefulness or initiative (Berk, Kauffman & Landrum, 2011, pg. 45). Play is a means for children to learn about themselves and they begin to adopt the moral and gender-role standards of the society in which they live (Berk, Kauffman & Landrum, 2011). A negative outcome of early childhood is the guilt children feel as a result of excessive punishment and criticism by the adults in their lives (Berk, Kauffman & Landrum, 2011)....
This understanding that a child 's behavior is a part of their social development is crucial
Many theorists have tried to define play as a concept, however, no two agree on a set definition. Their backgrounds and induvial lifestyles influence the way they see the importance of play. Reed and Brown also believe that there isn’t an agreed definition of play because is something that is felt rather than done (Reed & Brown, 2000 cited in Brock, Dodd’s, Jarvis & Olusoga, 2009). In spite of this, it is clear that most theorists uphold the ethos that play is imperative to a child’s learning and development. There is a wide range of different studies and theories which helps us develop our own perception of what play is. In my personal experience I have found play to be a way of expressive our emotions, exploring and learning new things, thus
Exploring How Psychologists Study the Role of Play in Child Development Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, New Edition, 1995 defines “play” as: “[Children] when children play, they do things that they enjoy, often together or with toys. ” Play is one of the most powerful vehicles children have for trying out and mastering new social skills, concepts and experiences. Psychologists, such as Faulkner (1995), present evidence that play is seen as a mean of developing social skills and interpersonal relationships with others. The first section of the essay will present the different approaches psychologists use in the quest to learn about the role of children’s play and their related issues. This section will briefly define the nature of play and the different types of play that influence social development.
Social domain helps interact with other classmates. There are many activities that promote the social skills. According to Berger (2015), Social learning theory is the behaviorism that emphasizes the influence that other people have over a person’s behavior. The individuals learn without an enforcement. The individual learns through observation and imitation of other people. This theory is also called observational learning. Children model their behavior from their parents, peers, and famous people. Social learning occurs through modeling in which the child copies what they see on other people they admire. However, there are some children that do the opposite of what a role model is doing. On April 19, 2016, I noticed that Charlotte played with a baby doll. Charlotte was experience social learning Charlotte covers the baby doll with a blanket and surprisingly removes the blanket from the baby doll. When Charlotte took out the blanket, she laughs at the baby doll. It seems like Charlotte was playing peek-a-boo with her doll. By Charlotte plays with her doll, it shows that she learned that activity with her mom/dad. Also, there was an infant called Loui and was playing with Charlotte. Loui laid down on the carpet and moving his hips side to side. When Charlotte saw Loui, she laid down on the carpet and started to do the same thing. They were playing this new game and they were interacting with one
During each observation, the kind of social context in which the child was interacting was recorded. This included A: alone, S: With same sex peer, O: With other sex peer and M: With same and other sex peers. In addition to recording the kind of social context, the type of social behavior (e.g. Aggressive-Behavior, Rough and Tumble Play, Prosocial Cooperative Play and Gender Stereotyped Play) was recorded. Aggressive behavior was defined by either verbal (name calling, teasing, tattling excluding others) or physical (hitting, pushing throwing something, grabbing away toys). Rough and Tumble Play consisted of forceful physical action done in a playful, happy way (e.g., chasing or tackling during a game). Prosocial Cooperative Play consisted of sharing toys/materials with a peer, cooperating, working on a common activity. Lastly, gender stereotyped play consisted of boys playing with trucks, balls, sports and girls playing with dolls, house, kitchen. These social behaviors were logged in a sheet used by the observers. This coding system was developed in order to measure the play patterns among preschool
“In Parten’s classification, the child’s movement from solitary play to more social categories of play is a positive developmental step.” Parten believed that solitary play was the least mature of types of play. However, contemporary research of older socially apt preschool children shows that solitary play may not be the product of social immaturity, but instead a personal choice of desirable play (Frost).
Play is a wonderful asset for our children and can benefit them in many ways: physical, language, self-concept, and social development are four examples of the different areas that massively impact a child’s development. The different play...
In 1994 Howes suggested, “children’s [pretence] is more sustained and complex when they are playing with friends, compared to acquaintances” (cited in Smith, 2009). Although Child A is not playing with a friend, it can be inferred that her Mum is more than her acquaintance; therefore, Howes’ statement can apply as if Child A was with a friend. Subsequently, this could explain how Child A managed to sustain her pretend play for five minutes at a minimum. Additionally, it has been proposed by Hartup that “mutuality and emotional commitment…may motivate children to sustain cooperative interaction” (1996, cited in Smith, 2009). Likewise to Howes’ perspective, this could explain Child A’s play behaviour. It can be assumed that as parent and child, the pair has an emotional commitment. In addition to this, it is evident from the observation there is cooperative interaction, as the Mum responds to what Child A says and does, and vice versa.
A major question that is continuously being researched and observed is whether children’s play is beneficial to children’s development. While many scientists have proved that play is, in fact, helpful in the development of children, I want to research how the different types of play affect children’s development, specifically children that are transitioning from late infancy to toddlerhood. The four different types of play that I will focus on observing is exploratory and manipulative play, functional or relational play, social play routines and pretend play. Furthermore, I would observe the children’s agency during their play and the social structures that can prevent children from playing, thus, resulting in lack of development.
The word “play” has numerous meanings to different people in different contexts. Therefore it cannot have one definition and is described in a number of ways. Smith (2010) describes play as involvement in an activity, purely for amusement and to take part for fun. That play is “done for it’s own sake, for fun, not for any external purpose.” (Smith, 2010. P4) Therefore, as one precise definition cannot be presented for the word ‘play,’ it is described in a number of ways such as social dramatic play. Briggs and Hanson (2012) portray social dramatic play as the building blocks of a child’s ability to accept the possibility to step into another world, building and developing on children’s higher order thinking, accentuating the child as a social learner. Another example of play is exploratory play, which is described as children being placed in an explorer or investigator role, to identify the cause or affect a resources that is presented to them has. (Briggs, M and Hanson, A. 2012) Games are also another example of play. They are included on the basis that playing games with rules, regardless of age, can develop a child’s intellectual capabilities along with their physical, behavioural and emotional health. (Briggs, M and Hanson, A. 2012).
Another rather consistent observation I saw was the indication that most children used their parent as a secure base. A secure base is provided through a relationship that harbors one or more responsive caregivers who meets the child’s needs and to whom the child can turn to as a safe haven, when upset or distraught. This relationship can be seen in many of the observations I made. The one that stands out the most and that clearly depicts how a child uses a secure base is Susy. Susy used her parents as secure base when she was frightened by the boy that was older than her and whom she didn’t know. She ran to her parents for protection and comfort from the stranger. Another clear depiction of a secure base was when Susy demonstrated separation
Children who generally relate well to other children respond agreeably to others, are friendly to most people, they are social, pleasant, welcoming and approachable. They relate to others at three different levels – interactions, relationships and with groups (Marion, 2015) pg. 220.
Play is such an important part of the learning and growing, especially for children. Children engage in many different types of play, but the play I saw the most when I observe the children of my daycare is sociodramatic play. The book Understanding Dramatic Play by Judith Kase-Polisini defines sociodramatic play as “both players must tacitly or openly agree to act out the same drama” (Kase-Polisini 40). This shows that children play with each other and make their worlds together as equal creators. Children also work together without argument.
Mildred Parten classified social play/behaviors into six categories: unoccupied, onlooker, solitary, parallel, associative, and cooperative. Unoccupied behavior is a non-play behavior, in which the child is occupied by looking at anything that is interesting at the moment, but does not engage in any type of play. The child may entertain him/her self by moving around, getting on and off furniture, playing with their body, or by glancing at their at surroundings while remaining in one spot. (Wortham & Reifel, 2010)