No Child Left Behind

1336 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: negative effects: no child left behind act (elementary and secondary education act) effects

In the United States, education plays a vital role for the government. It was a major interest of our Founding Fathers in writing the Constitution because our democracy relies on an educated society. John Adams once stated, “Education for every class and rank of people down to the lowest and poorest.” Our Founding Fathers did not want education only for the upper class, but also for the lower class as well. Education is essential for the development and prosperity of our country. It has enhanced American financial and administrative leadership. In acknowledging the importance of education, the federal government took upon a grander role of financing public schools with the passage of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) in 1965, which along the years was subjected to various reauthorizations. In 2001, the reauthorizations included No Child Left behind Act (NCLB), which required the states to set the standards for student performance as well as teacher quality. This act helps the educational advancement in schools because it improves the comprehensiveness and fairness of the American education.
The NCLB Act was signed by former President George Bush in 2002, which was created to improve student and achievement gaps. In the article, “No Child Left behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy”, Patrick J. McGuinn exclaimed, “No Child Left behind is an attempt by the federal government to regulate educational policy in the 50 states” (Patrick McGuinn,2007, p. 370). It is also designed to make sure that all students can achieve high standards from all states which include students with disabilities. Before the NCLB was passed, students with disabilities were excluded from school assessments. Now that this act was ...

... middle of paper ...

...Federalism. Backgrounder No. 2044. Heritage Foundation

Margaret E. Goertz. Peabody Journal of Education, Vol. 80, No. 2, Federalism Reconsidered: The Case of the No Child Left Behind Act (2005), pp. 73-89

Talley, R. C., Walz, G. R., National Education Goals Panel, W. C., ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Student Services, G. C., & National Alliance of Pupil Services, O. n. (1996). Safe Schools, Safe Students. Proceedings of the National Education Goals Panel/National Alliance of Pupil Services Organizations Conference on "Safe Schools, Safe Students: A Collaborative Approach to Achieving Safe, Disciplined, and Drug-free Schools Conducive to Learning" (Washington, D.C., October 28-29, 1994).

William Paul Wanker and Kathy Christie. Peabody Journal of Education, Vol. 80, No. 2, Federalism Reconsidered: The Case of the No Child Left Behind Act (2005), pp. 57-72

Show More
Related

  • The Death And Life Of The Great American School System By Diane Ravitch

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    The implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act applied a market approach to school reform as a way of improving the school system. This new law promised an era of high standards, testing, and accountability in

    Read More

  • Standardized Testing Has a Negative Effect on American Youth

    1129 Words  | 3 Pages

    Neill, Monty. "The No Child Left Behind Act Is Not Improving Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 162-68. Print.

    Read More

  • Federalists in the 19th Century

    1181 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, the success and failure of federalism depends on the balance between the central government and federal units. Considering the case in United States, education is very important throughout the nation. However, due to the gap of achievement in students in each state, the federal government started the No Child Left Behind Program in 2002. The NCLB program grants the accountability for educational benchmark and provides many schools flexible educational program that work best in their localities. The NCLB program draws the 50 states to work on the achievement gaps of students in the United States. It helps reshape the role of state and local public administrators in the United States, which were not foreseen at the time of the setting up of the federal system.

    Read More

  • Solutions to Problems with the No Child Left Behind Act

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) deals with student achievement standards by holding schools accountable for the achievement of their students (Implementation 11). The NCLBA uses standardized tests to chart the success of students. If students are not meeting standards, the school is required to offer tutoring, which is funded by the state with Title I, the education mandate passed in which granted all public schools access to federal grants, money (No Subject 7). The Act itself is not the problem; the problem is that the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) standard which is a big part of the NCLBA is not being met. The AYP standard is not being met because schools are not changing their methods quickly enough. It was said in the NCLBA that schools nationwide were to have 100% proficiency of the AYP standard within 12 years (Implementation 9). Since the passing of the NCLBA in 2001, most public schools, nationwide have not improved at all.

    Read More

  • Bush Administration: No Child Left Behind

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    The NCLB act is doing nothing for our school education in the United states. It affects children in grades k-6th in a negativity by assuming they all learn the same, which unfortuantly puts teachers in a predicament where they must teach these students regardless of their learning rate. This limits student education and does not allow them to learn in the classroom. Rather they learn how to learn strategically. In the book, Bell Curve: Intellegence and Class Structure, written by Charles Murray, the word intelligence describes something real and that it varies from person to person is as universal and ancient as any understanding about the state of a being human.

    Read More

  • No Child Left Behind Act

    631 Words  | 2 Pages

    Making the NCLB Act effective is quite a chore for the federal and state legislation. The positive influences for the act are quite controversial. Accountability standards are set and measured on a yearly basis by each individual state. The educator’s qualifications and standards are also state and federally mandated. Reading, math and writing are the key academic subjects that are measured. The goal is to close the gap among race, socioeconomic groups, and disabled students. The schools tend to focus on these areas, while they direct the education toward the test taking success rather than the child’s needs. Parents are given a whole academic achievement picture when receiving the test scores.

    Read More

  • Manifest and Latent Functions of the The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001’s main purpose was to enhance the education system and hold schools accountable in its attempt to bring equality in the fight against poverty for poor and minority groups. Once this Act was signed into law the American public expected an overhaul of the education system with only good outcomes. The public assumed our children would be receiving the best education available and the economic issues that plagued schools would no longer be a problem. In the beginning of its implementation No Child Left Behind was expected to bring America up to standards with other nations, this was something that America has struggled to do for many years. Our children were now being put first according to Act and the public and many political figures were ecstatic over the possibilities.

    Read More

  • The Effects Of The No Child Left Behind Act

    1463 Words  | 3 Pages

    Year after year students put themselves through large amounts of stress, attempts to prepare themselves mentally, and spend majority of their waking hours studying for standardized testing required through the No child left behind act (NCLB). An act put in place by the Bush Administration in hopes and efforts for student around the country to excel in education. However, the No Child Left behind Act is hindering a student’s ability to perform in the classroom rather than the student to excel as planned. Amongst other countries around the world, the United States performs significantly lower in education. Overall, the act had good intentions, but does it really raise achievement and close the achievement gap? Improving education has always been a top priority in the white house. Many laws have been passed but how many have succeed? NCLB is one of the biggest social engineering projects of our time, but shows very little progress in our children’s education. The No Child Left behind Act causes more of a negative outcome by being ineffective at achieving academic improvement, closing the education gap, limiting the teaching material for instructors, and causes a harmful repercussion on children and adolescents mentally and emotionally.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The No Child Left Behind Act

    2067 Words  | 5 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) is a federal social program that was signed

    Read More

  • No Child Left Behind: Annotated Bibliography

    1508 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ashby, Cornelia M. No Child Left Behind Act. [Electronic Resource] : Education Assistance Could Help States Better Measure Progress Of Students With Limited English Proficiency : Testimony Before The Subcommittee On Early Childhood, Elementary And Secondary Education, Committee On Education And Labor, House Of Representatives. n.p.: [Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2007], 2007. University of Alabama Libraries’ Classic Catalog. Web. 22 Feb. 2016.

    Read More

  • How important is Education to the Economy and Where Are the Funds for Education Going?

    1844 Words  | 4 Pages

    Even in this time of struggle, with billions of dollars going towards various war efforts overseas, America still has managed to keep taxpayer investments in education higher than that of funds for national defense (U.S Department of Education). In the 2004-05 school year, there was an estimated amount of 536 billion dollars set aside from taxpayer investment for education purposes. Without a doubt, education is a priority for the American government, and if these funds are used in the correct way, there is no reason why each and every kid in the United States shouldn’t be getting a quality education. However, the organization of the financial system is flawed, funds are not handled proportionately at the state level; rather, this system favors the wealthier districts and hands more funds to them while the less wealthier districts are handed a smaller pool of funds. This really affects America’s quality of education, which also reflects upon how America fairs on the world stage when it comes to competition in education with other countries. The disorganization of funds in the United States can be seen in the Hoover City School district, which has bought every student in that district an iPad for use in school. The first problem with this is that this school district does not even have a viable bus system that can transport students to and from school. Secondly, not even 20 miles from this district lies the Birmingham City School district where a little more than half the students are graduating, compared to Hoover City Schools where a bit more than 90 percent of the students are graduating. If anything, the state should be working towards improving educational standards in lower-income communities rather than debating on the log...

    Read More

  • Causes And Effects Of No Child Left Behind

    900 Words  | 2 Pages

    For years, the No Child Left Behind program and parents have gone head to head. Some parents believe that their children are not ready to advance, while the NCLB believes the students are ready to progress. The law does not care if the students does not understand the curriculum, just as long the child is meeting deadlines and passing the states standardized tests. This type of learning system only causes stress for teachers, students, and can be very unreliable.

    Read More

  • Budgetary Priorities

    1095 Words  | 3 Pages

    Cropf, (2008) subsequently, it is one of the guiding forces at the heart of our political process (p. 321). Education is a key field in any country including the United States of America. However, both the federal government and individuals states have not taken this issue seriously. Most of the legislations passed do not support additional funding to this sector. In the USA, the funding needed for education is provided by both the individual state and the federal government (Wong, 1999). In most states, the funds provided by the Federal government are too few to meet the education needs of the public schools system. This forces the schools to rely on funding from the local state. This act has resulted in disparity among various states, with some of them having very poor educational program and outcome for public school

    Read More

  • The Decline of Education Standards in the United States

    1664 Words  | 4 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act was set into place with the goal to improve student performance in school, and close the achievement gap between students; as Stecher, Vernez, and Steinburg state, “When congress passed the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), it established an ambitious goal for the nation’s states, districts, and schools: All children will be proficient in reading and mathematics by the 2013-2014 school year” (1). While the No Child Left Behind Act was implemented with good intentions, the act itself is one of the main reasons the United States is falling behind in educational rankings. One of the most common complaints of parents surrounding the No Child Left Behind Act is the weakest link factor: the weakest student sets the pace in the classroom. The weakest student...

    Read More

  • Critique of No Child Left Behind

    2843 Words  | 6 Pages

    As Rodney Paige, former Secretary of Education, said, “We have an educational emergency in the United States of America” (Hursh, 2007). The American ideal of egalitarianism essentially states that individuals should have an equal opportunity to pursue their dreams, and an important part of being able to achieve this is attaining a quality education. Students of differing racial, cultural, socioeconomic, and ability levels should all have the same opportunities in receiving a high-quality education. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is seeking to change this. The NCLB is the current authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (Houston, 2007), which was passed during President Lyndon B. Johnson’s administration. Every five years the ESEA is renewed. It is currently due for renewal in 2014.

    Read More

More about No Child Left Behind

Open Document