Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
into the wild existentialism
into the wild existentialism
into the wild existentialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: into the wild existentialism
Philosophy is an activity of thought and a study of wisdom. While not everyone may understand or comprehend philosophy, they do have their own philosophical perspective or view of the world. A “worldview” is a “commitment, a fundamental orientation of the heart, that can be expressed as a story or in a set of presuppositions that we hold about the basic constitution of reality, and that provides the foundation on which we live and move and have our own being” (Sire, 20). Worldviews consist of a prime reality, a nature of external reality, a definition of a human being, an explanation for what happens to humans when they die, an explanation for how it is possible to know anything, an explanation for how humans know right from wrong, and an explanation for the meaning of human history. Prime reality is what someone believes to be “really real” in the world, while external reality is the surrounding world.
There are a plethora of worldviews, many of which do not have a name. The “best” worldview depends upon what a person perceives for themselves to be “the best”. Although some people might find parts or aspects of other worldviews that they like. My own worldview is a combination between new age, traditional theism, naturalism, and theistic existentialism called new theistic natural existentialism. This world view can be continuously debated. Here, there will be evaluations of other worldviews. They will include objections, agreements, and interesting points. In evaluating the other worldviews, I have found my own objections for new theistic natural existentialism and counterarguments for my worldview.
My Worldview
In the beginning of philosophy, the prime reality was God and it remains so for some philosophies. This worldview fo...
... middle of paper ...
...you will not find the answer you are looking for and interchangeably the other way around. The beginning of human knowledge was the recognition of God’s existence and then the study of nature, which reflected the work of God. God created the system that is the cosmos and is at the same time a part of it.
Conclusion
New theistic natural existentialism is a combination of other philosophies and is my perspective of the world. There will be people that agree with this world view and those that will disagree with it. Individually there are specific parts of my world view that people will like or find interesting. It is all a matter of perspective and everyone has their own world view, whether or not they made it into an official philosophy.
Works Cited
Works Cited
Sire, James W. (2009). The Universe Next Door, 5th edition. Illinois: InerVarsity Press, 2009. Print.
Many Christians rejected the philosophy of existentialism on the grounds that it denies “the reality and seriousness of human affairs” and that man will “be incapable… of condemning either the point of view or the action of anyone else.” (Sartre 1). Sartre denies this claim later in Existentialism is a Humanism by rejecting the misconception that an existentialist holds no conviction. Rather, he states, existentialists have the most conviction of anyone, because in “choosing for himself he chooses for all men.” (Sartre 4) Sartre claims this to be the “deeper meaning of existentialism.” It is the subjectivity of what is good or evil, the essence that man decides for himself, that has an impact on everyone else; within this subjectivity lies the responsibility for bettering mankind, a responsibility few men would choose to ignore.
It was in the 19th centuries where a French writer Jean-Paul Sartre who popularized the concept of existentialism during his play No Exit. The play was published in 1943. Sartre explained Existentialism, which states in the belief that life has no meaning. Reynolds stated that, “People should be responsible for themselves rather than make excuses for the occurrences in their life, the belief that humans have free will” ( ). Each is separate from all other individuals, so each person has the power to place himself in the position he wishes, that every individual is responsible for his actions.
In order to begin the process of learning how these two worldviews can co-exist, one must understand exactly what a wor...
One’s worldview is usually dependant on how the particular individual interprets life and its occurrences. Additionally, if one believes something to be so, it will be so to them. It’s all a matter of perception. However, which perspective is truly accurate: Agnosticism, Theism, or Deism? These three worldviews have been the subject of countless debates throughout history and that have yet to be concluded. The purpose of this philosophical essay is to suggest that theism is likely to be considered the correct worldview.
Prime reality is God. He is all knowing and is with each of us at all times. Some do not believe this is possible, but believers know this to be the truth. As Christians, we live by God’s word as written in the Bible and if we truly believe what is told, we will have no reason not to believe that God is the one and only Prime Reality. “Acknowledge and take to heart this day that the Lord is God in heaven above and on the earth below, There is no other.” (Deuteronomy 4:39 NIV)
The foundation of a Christian worldview is the belief in a personal God, creator and ruler of the universe. The Christian worldview views the world through God’s word, providing the framework for humanity to live by giving meaning and purpose to life. It defines who Jesus is, human nature, and how salvation is achieved. In essence it is the basis of which Christians behave, interact, interpret life and comprehend reality. A Christian worldview imparts confidence, answers to life’s problems, and hope for the future. In this paper I will discuss the essentials of a Christian worldview and an analysis of the influences, benefits, and difficulties sustaining the Christian faith.
Since the beginning of the human race there has been a lingering question as to the origins of man and how all living things acquired their characteristics. The two main theories that arose over time were Creationism and Evolution, both of which provided very distinct answers to this question. Creationism based its answer on the idea of a supernatural power or being that created the entire universe, man and the numerous other organisms that live within it. While, Evolution theorizes that all living things have the potential to change and grow over time into something new and different. So in other words, one theory suggests that humans and all the organisms on Earth are the result of divine design, while the other indicates that they are only the result of environmental adaption and growth. However, as neither theory is without flaw and it is only through close examination that a true understanding of man’s origins can be obtained.
Our worldviews are constructed by the help of Metaphysics, giving us an analytical view of reality and our place in it. But what is Metaphysics? Simply put, it is the study of the nature of reality. It encompasses everything that exists, whether the world is real or just a mere illusion. Without an explanation or interpretation of the world, we would be lost. The degree to which our metaphysical worldview is accurate corresponds with how we are able to understand the world. Two of the main contributors to the developmental worldviews of Metaphysics have been Naturalism or Supernaturalism.
In its simplest form, my philosophy is this: Each of our experiences shape the way that we perceive the world around
1) Barnes, Wesley. "Is Existentialism Definable?" The Philosophy and Literature of Existentialism. Woodbury: Barron's Educational Series, Inc., 1968
Everyone has a worldview with main characteristics that are ever changing. Different sources influence this framework such as parenting, friendship, telecommunication or internet media, educational and religious sectors. Hindson and Caner (2008) propose standardization methods of worldview are measured either by emotions and feelings, socialism, or the truth (Hindson & Caner, 2008, p.499). Recognition of a person’s worldview can be found based on ones answer to several reality questions surrounding God (origin), human nature (identity), reality (meaning/purpose), after life (destiny), values (morality or ethics).
James Sire the author of the book The Universe Next Door wants us to exam ourselves to discover what our own worldview. Understanding or discovering our worldview helps in the process of becoming self-aware, self-knowledge, and self-understanding. To assist in this discovery, he provides seven questions to answer. Each of the questions asked are used to seek what your worldview is or consists of. Not every person is going to answer these questions the same as we all have different beliefs or ideas of the world. The seven questions are what is prime reality (the really real), what is the nature of external reality (the world around us), what is a human being, what happens to a person when they die, why is it possible to know anything at
An underlying theme present throughout the series is the possibility that our existence is not the only one. According to current theories in physics, it is entirely possible that our universe is just one of many universes f...
Today’s society consists of many worldviews. Most people tend to pull beliefs from different religions, but often stick to one main worldview. A worldview to me is the gathering of beliefs that shape what we do on a daily basis and forms our overall view on life. When I look at my beliefs critically, I am able to see my worldview and see how it compares to different worldviews, but also how it compares mainly to the Christian Worldview.
In the world of philosophy there are many theory’s that talk about the nature of reality and substance. Right now in the world there are four theories that out show the other ones. These theories are materialism/ physicalism, idealism, transcendental idealism, and dualism. Each one of these theories have good arguments that support their believes, but at the same time they also have their weakness. That is why none of these four theories can be taken off the list of the top 4. Because even though they have their own weakness they have their strong points that make u in a sense think about why that theory is the right one when it comes to the nature of reality and substance.