Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
negative impacts of animal testing
cons to animal testing
testing of animals controversy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: negative impacts of animal testing
Many people may not realize that the majority of products in their own home have been tested on animals; from lipstick and shampoo to dish soap and foot powder. Even the white ink on an M&M has been tested on animals. To some, this statement may be alarming and even disturbing – to others it may not mean much at all. Either way, the debate over animal testing has gained much popularity in recent decades. Animal testing has been done since at least 500 BC; even Aristotle experimented on animals for scientific reasoning. Around 200 AD, dissecting animals in public was actually used as a form of entertainment, people would actually go and watch someone perform a vivisection on an animal. Vivisection is when an organism is dissected while it is still alive (“Animal Testing”). The public did not start objecting animal testing until the 19th century, which was around the time when more people started to adopt domestic pets. In 1875, the first group to protect animals from testing was formed, called the Society for the Protection of Animals Liable to Vivisection (“Animal Testing”). Through the 20th century, companies began testing products on animals before they would be put on the market. It was not until recent years that scientific evidence revealed that animals experience pain much more than what was originally believed. Unfortunately, the agonizing cries of the animals was not convincing enough for the scientists of the past. This is where the animal testing controversy begins (Scott). Animal testing is unnecessary, inhumane, and unreliable. There are many pros and cons that come along with animal testing, but there are usually more cons of animal testing, then there are pros. Animal testing is unnecessary. Some people who are f... ... middle of paper ... ...uct is pulling money from the pockets of these companies and scientists. It is important to be informed on this because people make decisions every day and do not realize that they are supporting animal testing by buying these products. Everyone is involved because they are either supporting it by buying those products, or not supporting it by not buying those products. By being informed on the effects of consumerism has on the welfare of animals, a life can be saved just by buying a different product. Works Cited "Animal Testing." ProConorg Headlines. Animal Testing ProCon, n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2014. . Ferdowsian, Hope R. "Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research." EBSCO Animals. EBSCO, Sept. 2011. Web. Mar. 2014. Scott, John Paul. Animal Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1958. Print
When you reach for a cosmetic product or even medication you do so in confidence that these products have been tested and are safe for you to use. You use these products knowing that they have been tested repeatedly, but do you know how they have been tested? It turns out that many of the products that you use every day such as cosmetics and even medication have been tested thoroughly on animals (Abbot). These test that are being ran are supposed to be for our safety but in many cases “the results of testing on animals are different from the results of testing on humans because we have different physiologies and metabolisms” (Callanan 20). These test on animals are not only unnecessary and sometimes give false results but they cause harm to
Writing this paper did not affect my original line of thinking in regards to the topic. I support animal rights in every way, and am extremely against any sort of testing. Observing the “necessities” of animal testing did not, in any way, alter my negative view of animal experimentation.
Hundreds of millions of animals lives are taken each year because of the “necessity” of testing products that don’t apply to animals whatsoever. Therefor, I hold my stance as an advocate, or being against animal testing in general. There are many advocates for this topic which is a positive aspect, but it is still happening out there. Once again I believe animals should not be tested on for products because all living things should be treated humanely, there are other ways to test products, and millions of animals are put to their death because of the
The issue of animal testing has become an important topic of debate because despite the cruel and inhumane treatment of laboratory animals, people who support animal testing claim that the research benefits are phenomenal and surely outweigh the animals’ pain and suffering. I feel as though the question of whether or not animal testing is immoral is an easy answer. Animal testing on any species is unethical and should be abolished as soon as possible because it is a form of animal cruelty, provides inaccurate results, and there are better alternatives that can be pursued.
“If you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal who hasn't done anything? They should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. So, rather than seeing if perfume irritates a bunny rabbit's eyes, they should throw it in Charles Manson's eyes and ask him if it hurts.” -Ellen DeGeneres. Although I probably should be agreeing with Ellen, I feel that animal testing is a good thing. Yes, that may make me sound cruel, but animal testing can bring many benefits to a lot of people. I’m not trying to say that animal testing isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but I’m saying that it’s an important thing that we have to do in society to keep us healthy. “About 20 million animals are experimented on and killed annually, three-fourths for medical purposes and the rest to test various products.” -Santa Clara University, Claire Andre and Manuel Vasquez. Obviously, that’s a lot of animals that are being tested on. Yes, I do feel that maybe scientists are going overboard and testing on a few too many animals. But, I still feel that animal testing is a strong factor in human health.
Throughout history, beginning as early as 500 BC, animals have been used to test products that will later be utilized by humans (“Animal Testing” 4), what isn’t publicly discussed is the way it will leave the animals after the process is done. Many innocent rabbits, monkeys, mice, and even popular pets such as dogs are harmed during the testing application of cosmetics, medicine, perfumes, and many other consumer products (Donaldson 2). Nevertheless, there are many people whom support the scandal because "it is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective” for human benefit (Drayson). The overall question here is should it even be an authorized form of experimentation in the United States, or anywhere else? The fact of the matter is that there are alternatives to remove animals out of the equation for good (“Alternatives” 1). They are cheaper, and less invasive than the maltreatment of the 26 million innocent animals that are subjected to the heartlessness of testing each year (“Animal Testing” 4). All in all, due to the harsh effects of animal testing, it should be treated as animal cruelty in today’s society.
For many years, animal testing has been the main solution to test household products, food, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. The term “animal testing” refers to the procedure performed on certain animals to determine if a certain product is safe. Most of these procedures done on the animal can cause a great amount of physical pain, and distress. Most animals die shortly after the experiment because so much pain was inflicted on their body. After the testing is done, the animals are left to suffer in cages. The different types of experiments performed on the animals are outrageous. There is even an alternative to animal testing, but scientist refuse to use it, and some people wonder if animals are even needed for medical research.
Rogers, Kara. "Advocacy for Animals." Advocacy for Animals Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Apr. 2014.
Festing, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). The ethics of animal research. Talking point on the use of animals in scientific research. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2002542/.
Animal testing is a controversial topic with two main sides of the argument. The side apposing animal testing states it is unethical and inhumane; that animals have a right to choose where and how they live instead of being subjected to experiments. The view is that all living organism have a right of freedom; it is a right, not a privilege. The side for animal testing thinks that it should continue, without animal testing there would be fewer medical and scientific breakthroughs. This side states that the outcome is worth the investment of testing on animals. The argument surrounding animal testing is older than the United States of America, dating back to the 1650’s when Edmund O’Meara stated that vivisection, the dissection of live animals, is an unnatural act. Although this is one of the first major oppositions to animal testing, animal testing was being practiced for millennia beforehand. There are two sides apposing each other in the argument of animal testing, and the argument is one of the oldest arguments still being debated today.
The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion.
Animal testing is a cruel and inhumane action that humans cause by holding different kinds of animals captive in small cells and testing dangerous and toxic chemicals on them. “More than 100 million animals are poisoned, burned, crippled,and abused in other ways in the U.S labs each year” (PETA Top Five Shocking) because they are being tested. Dangerous and toxic chemicals are tested on the animals to make sure it won’t harm humans. Some animals don’t last very long because the chemicals kill them very quickly and painfully. There are many famous brands that do animal testing like Covergirl, Aveeno, Olay, Old Spice, and even the famous toothpaste brand, Crest. The kinds of animals tested on are mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, farm animals (like horses), birds, cats, dogs, mini-pigs, and non-human primates, monkeys, and chimpanzees. That is a lot of different animals! Scientists believe that animals have traits similar to humans like the stomach and eyes which is the reason why they are tested. The way animals are tested is extremely painful. For example, products for cleaning are tested on animals like rabbits. What scientists do is rub the toxic product on the rabbits skin, ears, and they even put it in their eyes which very painful for an innocent creature like a rabbit. When you see the labels on cleaning products, you see that there are signs that warn people to not put the product near their eyes or mouth. It’s basically the results that scientists saw in an animal when experimenting on them. In the 1930’s, very little regulation existed for sales of personal care and cleaning products. Companies were not required to test the product or even do any research on how toxic the chemicals are. More than a dozen...
Many businesses today test their products on animals before putting them on the market, which creates a controversial issue. The effects of animal testing can be beneficial in some ways but there are other efficient ways to test these products without putting the life of an animal in harm. Photos have been revealed to the public of the after-effects on animals from certain products, and after seeing these photos it should make everyone realize the cruelty of this and put a stop to animal testing. Many argue that animals should be used for research; however, the potential harm and suffering that can result from the testing is inhumane.
As seen throughout the research done throughout this paper, it is clear the animals should not be tested on, regardless of the circumstance. This is because there are plenty of alternatives to these tests that will not harm animals and will be much safer in general, animals are very often mistreated and abused in the process of testing for product safety, and the results of the tests performed on animals might not have the same effect on humans. These three reasons are why animal testing should be completely banned in the U.S. If animal testing continues, then the lives of many innocent animals will be taken away from them for a reason that doesn’t add up to the lives of animals being taken away.
For years researchers have relied on animal trials to test every type of product that is put on the market. They are subjected to cosmetics, food additives, and household and industrial products; all of which do not concern animals. While some in both the medical and scientific community believe animal testing is beneficial it is morally offensive, delays possible cures and is completely unnecessary.