Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
key elementsof military leadership
key elementsof military leadership
key elementsof military leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: key elementsof military leadership
Introduction. Common Attributes of military leaders are just that, common. The accomplished Generals, Colonels and Majors that contributed to the most successful wars of our country have been molded a certain way. They are molded through vigorous training both in scholastic training and in the field along with rigorous mentorship. Colonel Lewis McBride was a rare exception to the rule. As a renowned Chemical museum curator so distinctively puts it, he was, without a doubt, one of the most interesting and industrious officers in the history of the US Army Chemical Corps.
The kindling of invention. Before the he chemical core was known as CBRN(Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear), back when the Chemical Warfare Service was labeled CWS, Colonel McBride chipped away at the barriers at the complexities of our chemical weapons and made a huge impact through his research to go along with it. Although Colonel McBride was predominately self taught, he began his success as an electrical engineer. The beginning of his military career started in 1904 when he was 25 years old. He accepted a commission to the National Guard in Colorado. Shortly after, World War I began and he transitioned to the Corps of Engineers. Sixteen years later, CPT McBride at the moment, moved on to the CWS thus began his dexterity for invention. This along with his interest in chemistry was a huge impact in the development of many weapons.
Greatest inventions. CPT McBride was assigned to Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland and started redesigning the 4-inch Stokes mortar. This mortar is named after Frederick W.S. Stokes who was an English inventor. Although the 4-inch Stokes mortar was an effective short-range weapon and it was capable of firing chemical-filled sh...
... middle of paper ...
... W. (1959). From laboratory to field (1st ed.). Washington,
DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, Dep. of the Army.
3Brophy, L. (1959). The Chemical Warfare Service (1st ed.). Washington: Office of the Chief of
Military History, Dept. of the Army.
4Brophy, L., & Fisher, G. (1959). Organizing for war (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Office of the
Chief of Military History, Dep. of the Army.
5Lindberg, K. (n.d.). Soldier, machinist, inventor, patriot--the legacy of Colonel Lewis McBride.
- Free Online Library. Retrieved May 17, 2014, from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Soldier,+machinist,+inventor,+patriot--the+legacy+of+Colonel+Lewis...-a0137875684.
6Mauroni, A. (2014). The U.S. Army Chemical Corps | The Campaign for the National Museum of the United States Army. Armyhistory.org. Retrieved 16 May 2014, from https://armyhistory.org/09/the-u-s-army-chemical-corps/
Charles Keller started his military career in 1890 (Arrasmith, 2011). He first retired in 1923 after 33 years of outstanding service (Historical Vignette, 2004). In 1940, during World War II, General Keller was recalled to active duty. Upon his second retirement in 1943, he was recognized as the oldest Army officer on active duty during war (Historical Vignette, 2004). This paper provides additional information about his works and contributions in the field of United States Army Engineers.
B”Heller, C.E (1984). Leavenworth papers No 10. Chemical warfare in world war I. Combat studies institute”.
Seth Schonwald M.D. A.B.M.T. (1992, July). Mustard Gas. The PSR Quarterly Vol. 2 No. 2
Weigley, Russel F. History of the United States Army. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1st Edition, 1984.
HQ, Department of the Army. (2014). Army Techniques Publication 3-11.24: TECHNICAL CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, NUCLEAR, AND EXPLOSIVES FORCE EMPLOYMENT. Washington, DC: HQ, Department of the Army.
Headquarters, Department of the Army (2014). Technical Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives Force Employment (ATP 3-11.24).
Midway, Steve. "11 Science Lessons -- from War - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life
Colonel Lewis McBride was born in Iowa in 1879; he pursued a career in electrical engineering (Lindberg 2005). Colonel McBride accepted a commission for the Colorado National Guard which is a component of the United States Army, Colorado Guard began its service in 1903, Colorado Army National Guard web page (2013). But as the First World War began, Colonel Lewis McBride became a member of the Corps of Engineers. The Corps of Engineers became a permanent army branch in 1802 and was in charge of such tasks like construct buildings and monuments in the Nation’s capital, US Army Corps of Engineers web site (2013). Once again when opportunity became available Colonel McBride a Captain at th...
Before the CDTF was built Soldiers had live toxic training, but it had to be conducted outdoors as it represented the most effective training. Since 1973 the use of training with live chemical agents stops due to environmental concerns and low safety regulations (Unknown, 2011). In 1981the US Army Chemical School (USACMLS) plan and develop a training facility to be used indoors and safer for the environment and the Soldiers. The construction of the new training facility was 14.9 million dollars and it was finished in 1986 at Fort McClellan, Alabama. (Unknown, Transition Force, United States Army Garrison-FT McClellan, Alabama) The first chemical class to utilize the new CDTF was on March 1987. Thus started the age of Chemical (Unknown, 2011) Soldier’s being able to have assurance that their equipment is more than capable of protecting them in a chemical attack. Many allied nations have used and received training from our CDTF but no other like Germany. In 1988, Germany’s decontamination trai...
U. S. Army Center of Military History (2013). Lineage and honors information: 56th chemical detachment. Retrieved from http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/lineages/
Barringer, Mark, Tom Wells. “The Anti-War Movement in the United States.” www.english.illinois.edu. Oxford UP. 1999. Web. 14 Nov. 2013.
The purpose of this essay is to deal with the fact that chemical warfare should be brought back to modern warfare strategies. As Warren Rudman said, “And they will tell you unequivocally that if we have a chemical or biological attack or a nuclear attack anywhere in this country, they are unprepared to deal with it today, and that is of high urgency.” Rudman’s words are true in what they say and that we should do everything to counter-act his statement. Biological weapons are a key to outstanding success in war and therefore, I strongly suggest that chemical warfare is an effective and producible weapon tactic that can be used on today’s battlefield.
The U.S. Military had many great officers during WWII and one of the best was Gen. Omar Bradley. Omar became the soldier he was through hard work, discipline, and patience. If it were not for the traits he possessed he would have never made it to the rank of Captain.
The Chemical corps has changed dramatically since it was created in June 1918. The United States Army was not prepared for chemical warfare in World War I. The United States sent the American Expeditionary force under the command of General Pershing to train and equip American forces for gas defense. It wasn’t until 28 June 1918 that the Chemical corps became recognized by the War Department receiving the name of Chemical War Service.
Pita, R. (2009). Toxin weapons: From World War I to jihadi terrorism. Toxin Reviews, 28(4), 219-237. doi:10.3109/1556950903246136