Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The arguments of animal rights
Justifiability of animal rights
The arguments of animal rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The arguments of animal rights
Animal Testing for Medicine
What do you feel is more important - the life of your child or the
life of a few rats? These comments are often brought up in animal
rights debates. On the one side the animal rights campaigners, on the
other side researchers intent on finding new medicines to improve the
quality of human life.
Animal activists claim that animal testing, or 'vivisection' is a
scientific disaster and that thousands have been injured or killed as
a result of it and time and time again researchers have been lead into
a blind alley.
Vivisection literally means, "cutting while still alive," but these
days it refers to any experiments conducted on animals. According to
the 1999 U.K. Vivisection statistics published by the government, 2.66
million animals were subjected to experiments 'likely to cause pain,
suffering, distress or lasting harm' in the U.K. alone.
Many different kinds of animals suffer this fate, including monkeys,
baboons (including wild-caught baboons), dogs, cats, pigs, rabbits,
mice, rats, gerbils, guinea pigs, sheep, horses, goats, budgerigars
and many others. These experiments include the animals being poisoned,
genetically mutated, infected with lethal pathogens, stressed,
deprived of parental care, irradiated, burnt, blinded, traumatised,
forced to inhale noxious substances and subjected to "interference
with the brain." The most common tests involve dripping materials into
rabbit's eyes or applying substances to the shaved backs of rabbits or
guinea pigs and studying the irritation or damage. Animals are also
force fed or dosed with substances to assess what affects the
substances have. These tests can cause great suffering to the animals.
But surely we need animal experiments to discover how safe new drugs
are before we give them to humans? Or do we? The combination of
Fenfluramine and Dexfenfluramine, touted as the answer to a dieter's
prayer a few years ago, was extensively tested on animals and found to
be very safe. Unfortunately it caused heart valve abnormalities in
humans. Or how about the arthritis drug Opren? Tests on monkeys found
no problems but it killed 61 people before it was withdrawn.
She sits alone in a threadbare, chilly, metal cage. Her eyes dart around wondering when the next torture will commence. If the testing fails to kill her, the stress definitely will. Entering is the doctor who plans to perform an eye irritancy test. The rabbit’s eyes will be held open with clips for at least three days if she survives that long (“Frequently Asked Questions”). Similarly, if these procedures would be performed on a human, they would be considered illegal. Yet, scientists continue to make harmless animals suffer incessantly. Annually, countless animals are abused in American test labs; however, alternative practices should be implemented in order to participate in worldwide trade, save innocent lives, and provide more accurate data.
‘Is it ethical to have a child for the purpose of saving another child’s life?’
SUMMARIZE: The article grants information on new models in cosmetics to take the place of animal experimentation. It goes on to talk about how the European Union has now banned using animal-based test for cosmetic reasoning. Pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies have been using computer-like tools to assess the toxicity it has for years. The author incorporates information on cosmetics and the outlook on further research. ‘According to experts, combination of laboratory-based with virtual work will be the future of testing and is progressing faster than they expected.” (87 words)
abortion but we can't let one bad apple spoil the whole bunch. The fact remains
The ethics of animal testing has been debated about since the late 1800s. Human beings feel that they are superior to animals because of the animals’ incapability of reasoning or eloquently expressing themselves like humans can. Animal testing dates as far back as ancient Greek and Roman colonies when people would dissect animals for pure curiosity and the acquirement of knowledge. Vivisections, the act of operating on live animals, occurred later on. Realdo Colombo was infamous for performing vivisection on pregnant dogs. He would take out a fetus from the dog’s womb and torment her young offspring in front of her. Despite the pain the mother dog experienced, she would bark furiously and attempt to reach her offspring. When Colombo gave her the puppy, she would tenderly lick it. This clearly demonstrates that the mother dog was far more concerned about her pup’s condition than her own well-being. This experiment on the pregnant dog is a blatant example of motherly love, which begs the question: Why would a human mother not instinctively act in this way, too? As Jeremy Bentham states, “The question is not, can they reason? Nor, can they talk? But, can they suffer?” (Evans). Testing on animals is inhumane and callous; consequently, it should be abolished.
Many women who carry unexpected or unwanted children are left to decide between keeping the child, adoption, abortion and maybe foster care. Most of the time the decision is just between adoption and abortion. In that case, the mother is losing the child either way. Most of the time choosing adoption or foster care would be a better choice than abortion because the pregnancy would end by giving life instead of death. Adoption and foster care are an opportunity for people who wish to be parents, but are not able to have a child of their own to finally become parents or people who have children of their own, but want to add-on to their family.
When it comes to abortion I believe that it should always be left up to the woman to make the decision on whether to keep her baby or not. Having a baby is no eas...
...ther’s sovereignty over her body outweigh the right of an unborn child to live. The answers to these questions are very diverse as a result of the diversity of the American society. With the issue of abortion, one’s attitude toward it is going to be based on many things such as religious background and personal morals. There is no black and white answer to the abortion issue. Luckily we live in a country where we are able to decide for ourselves whether something is morally right or wrong. Thus, ultimately, the choice is ours. As with the many other ethical issues which we are faced with in our society, it is hard to come to a concrete answer until we are personally faced with that issue. All we can do is make an effort to know all of the aspects which are involved so that we may be able to make a sound decision if we were faced with this problem in our own lives.
The ethics behind using animals for experiments and tests has been questioned and debated for years. Many people believe that animal experimentations can be crucial towards medical breakthroughs such as the cure for cancer, HIV/AIDS or asthma. Meanwhile others argue that animals that are used to test cosmetics such as make-up and perfumes are inhuman because is not going to help improve the human race. Animals suffer through multiple types of torture such as being forced to ingest poisonous chemicals, blinded, burned, stapled, and infected with disease viruses. Even though animal experimentation may be considered inhumane to many, animal experimentation is crucial to advancements in medical research and can lead to a better quality of life; on the other hand, animal experimentation should not be used to develop cosmetics because such experimentation is cruel and unnecessary.
Animal testing has been used for developing and researching cures for medical conditions. For example, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for cancer, insulin treatment for diabetes, organ transplants and blood transfusions are just some of the important advances that have come from research on animals (“Animal Testing”). Consuming animals for research benefits in developing various treatments and also benefits in discovery better methods for cures. According to the article “Animal Testing”, it says that the underlying rationale for the use of animal testing is that living organisms provide interactive, dynamic systems that scientists can observe and manipulate in order to understand normal and pathological functioning as well as the effectiveness of medical interventions. It relies on the physiological and anatomical similarities between humans and other animals (MacClellan, Joel). Meaning that animals have the same body components and features as humans and is the best thing to research on to better understand the human development. Even though several argue that animal testing is harming the animals, one has to think back to all the benefits that has come from it. There may be a little remorse for endangering animal lives, but realizing how far medicine has come makes it worth the while.
Argument Essay Where Would We Be Without Animal Testing? Is the use of animals in research justified? Should animal experimentation be permitted? Should these animals be liberated? A logical person would say the benefits justify the research.
The child could have a serious disorder from something such as the Zika virus and that child or the mother of the child should not be emotionally put through that. I can see the points made by the Pro-live such as abortion is murder, but abortion will most likely stay legalised in most Australian states like it is currently, and it will most likely stay that way. There are variables that could affect her choice. She could be poor, the child could have a birth defect, and so on. Giving her a right to decide whether she should abort the baby it’s entirely her choice. What if the mother was raped or she got pregnant from incest. Would you traumatise this mother with the child of the rapist for 9 months, and would you allow an inbred child that will most likely have a disability and be put through literal
Whether the person was sexually assaulted, or it was a mistake, there are always other options. Why do people think it is ok to end a life, but when a pregnant woman is killed it is a double homicide? Many couples cannot produce to make a baby and they seek adoption. If a woman gets pregnant to consented sex, I think the male and female should take responsibility for their own actions and accept the consequences. They made to choice to have sex. Sex is not a game to play around. Sex is to make babies. Having sexual intercourse carries with it the risk of pregnancy, an unborn baby must not be punished for a mistake two couples made and if they cannot support their child, allow them to at least seek a chance at life and put them up for adoption. There are families out there who will love them unconditionally! A human life begins at conception. In 25 days the heart starts beating. Abortion is no different to murder since it is an act of taking a human life. Taking away an innocent life, a being that has neither defense nor protection. Millions of families in the United States or around the world wanting to adopt a child, I do not see such thing as an unwanted pregnancy. Why should women’s risk their health by making a hasty decision? Terminating an innocent life, which can possibly result in medical condition later in life, the chances of miscarriage and pelvic inflammatory
A dispute in the abortion or no abortion case would be should abortion ever be okay. According to I believe that a baby that only has a two percent chance of even making it to birth, and then if it is born will only likely live for a day the parents should have the option of abortion. That being said I think that if someone is in that situation they can have the bab, give it all the love you can in its short life. That baby is yours, and there is nothing that could upset me more than giving a baby that could have one amazing day on earth no chance at all. Either way the baby is going to die, in one way it is murder and for what?
the mother or the child? After all, the child gets his own way and now