Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frederick Taylor contributions
Applicability of the Scientific Management theory
Applicability of the Scientific Management theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Frederick Taylor contributions
FREDERICK W. TAYLOR
Frederick W. Taylor (1856-1915) rested his philosophy on four basic principles:
1. The development of a true science of management, so that the best method for performing each task could be determined.
2. The scientific selection of workers, so that each worker would be given responsibility for the task for which he or she was best suited.
3. The scientific education and development of the worker.
4. Intimate, friendly cooperation between management and labor.
Taylor contended that the success of these principles required "a complete mental revolution" on the part of management and labor. Rather than quarrel over profits, both sides should try to increase production; by so doing, he believed, profits would rise to such an extent that labor and management would no longer have to fight over them. In short, Taylor believed that management and labor had a common interest in increasing productivity.
Taylor based his management system on production-line time studies. Instead of relying on traditional work methods, he analyzed and timed steel workers' movements on a series of jobs. Using time study as his base, he broke each job down into its components and designed the quickest and best methods of performing each component. In this way he established how much workers should be able to do with the equipment and materials at hand. He also encouraged employers to pay more productive workers at a higher rate than others, using a "scientifically correct" rate that would benefit both company and worker. Thus, workers were urged to surpass their previous performance standards to earn more pay Taylor called his plan the differential rate system.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT THEORY
The modem assembly line pours out finished products faster than Taylor could ever have imagined. This production "miracle" is just one legacy of scientific management. In addition, its efficiency techniques have been applied to many tasks in non-industrial organizations, ranging from fast-food service to the training of surgeons.
LIMITATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT THEORY
Although Taylor's method led to dramatic increases in productivity and to higher pay in a number of instances, workers and unions began to oppose his approach because they feared that working harder or faster would exhaust whatever work was available, causing layoffs.
Moreover, Taylor's system clearly meant that time was of the essence. His critics objected to the "speed up" conditions that placed undue pressures on employees to perform at faster and faster levels.
In the time of the Industrial Revolution factory owners were brutal and unfair to their employees. A young worker named William Cooper, was asked by a Sadler Committee, “ What were your usual hours of working? What time did you have for meals? What means were taken to keep you awake and attentive?” and he answered,
Fredrick W. Taylor’s main intentions for his theory of Scientific Management was to effectively increase the amount of productivity and efficiency within an organisation. As Robbins and Coulter stated, ‘the use of scientific methods to define the “one best way” for a job to be done’. (Robbins, Coutler, n.d, pg. 29). Taylor introduced a ‘fair days wage’ as mentioned in Episode 143: Fredrick Winslow Taylor’s Scientific Management (2013) to be paid regardless for the amount of output each person produced. This wage was determined by the standard a worker should be pr...
Ford used Taylor’s scientific management principles and come up with the mass production and assembly line. This benefitted the motor vehicle industry highly. The effects of Taylorism and Fordism in the industrial workplace were strong and between the period of 1919-1929 the output of industries in the U.S doubled as the number of workers decreased. There was an increase in unskilled labour as the skill was removed and placed into machines. It lead to the discouragement of workers ability to bargain on the basis of control over the workplace.
How would you feel if your boss cut down your work paycheck just because he wanted a better life for them self? The men, women and children that worked in factories during the 18th and 19th centuries were brutally mistreated causing poverty, injuries and pallid body types (Thompson). At the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, working was incredibly unsafe because there were absolutely no labor or safety laws. Working conditions back then were extremely different from those that are in place today. The unbearable working conditions caused a vast amount of labor laws and rights.
Comparisons that can be made include Fordism's mechanisation of mass production and Taylor's attempts at using employees as machines. Taylor designed this using his principles of management that included developing a science for each element of work and finding the quickest way the job could be done.
If we look at the assembly line way of working we see that tasks are set to individuals specifically and the individuals aren't able to work in other areas to develop different skills, therefore making the job they do repetitive, which could lead to carelessness in doing there job, there was also low level of skills required to do the job, therefore no motivation to learn new skills. " Taylorism reduces the worker to an automaton and denies the worker any chance for relief or modulation of the pace of work and is enormously stressful and oppressive." www.marxists.org
It will be unfair to say that Taylor’s theory did not do any good for the economy as a whole. In fact it really helped the economy in age of industrial development. But presently, in the age of high technologies we do not need to stress people to work hard. Many jobs require qualified people that being fired very hard to replace. Creating a workaholic – Type A persons, can be very dangerous for future economics of single company and nation’s economy in the whole.
Since the end of the 19th century, when factory manufacturing became widespread and the size of organisations increased, people have been looking for ways to motivate employees and improve productivity. A need for management ideas arise which lead to classical contributors such as Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol generating management theories such as Taylor’ Scientific Management and Fayol’s Administrative Management. In the late 1920’s and early 1930’s the Hawthorne studies were conducted where Elton Mayo was the predominate figure and contributed to the Behavioural viewpoint. This brought about a Human Relations Movement which included Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y approach. Similarities and differences can be found between the theories due to the relevant time period they were implemented, the motives or goal of the theory and how they view organisations. However the use of contingency theory can help negate the dissimilarities which occur as it allows the relevant elements from each theory to be applied to specific situations.
Compare and contrast the management theories of Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo and Douglas McGregor. In what sense(s) are these theories similar and/or compatible? In what sense(s) are these theories dissimilar and/or incompatible? How would a contingency theorist reconcile the points of dissimilarity and/or incompatibility between these approaches?
The founding father of scientific management theory is Fredrick Winslow Taylor. He was an American mechanical engineer and an inventor. Modern management theorist Edward Deming credited Taylor for his contributions while Joseph Juran criticized his work for extracting more work from workers. However a careful reading of Taylor’s work will disclose that he placed workers interest as high as the employer’s in his studies. Before the principles of management are discussed it is very important to understand the causes which led Taylor to derive the four principles of management. The three causes are as follows:
There are several theories that examine an organization and it’s approach to managing work in an effort to develop efficiency and increase production. Two classical approaches to management are Taylor’s scientific management theory and Weber's bureaucratic management theory. Both men are considered pioneers of in the study of management.
He encouraged that each manager should be accountable for whatever took place in their office and that all should have one superior whom they reported to. Organizations had a system of rules and regulations which they had to abide by for as long as they were in those organizations. Employees when they joined organizations they were oriented of how they should behave in the organization and what was expected of them.
(The science of administration-to study and investigate what others have previously studied and have accomplished in administrative roles.)
The fast food restaurant Burger King uses Scientific Management by following a ‘one best way’ method of doing tasks, implemented by Taylor as an advanced form of standardised production. This includes scientifically hiring, training and developing each employee, encouraging a ‘work-for-reward’ based mind-set, and dividing workload between managers and workers fairly with regards to specific roles. This provides a stable working environment where workers work harder under better working conditions. Burger King shows evidence of a modern organisations that can reflect the scientific management principles; as Burger King consists of a system that offers rewards to employees for meeting the objective goals. Taylor stated that if workers are given no incentives despite putting in more effort, workers will be discouraged to work. Burger King uses a competitive wage and promotion programme where hard work is recognised and rewarded. Regular monitoring of performance and pushing for improvement avoids ‘under working’. Therefore, creating supervisors and leaders ensure discipline and makes a business perform well. The challenges that encouraged Taylor’s time and motion studies is still present within organisations today. However, management has developed new ways of encouraging output. In today’s business organisations employers are more concerned with ‘performance’ rather than
Secondly, his Functional Theory too management oriented and often neglect the wellbeing of the workers. Workers often treated as a mechanical tools which their only concern is how to follow orders. Many modern management views have criticised on this point as they pin-point that workers are humans and they do require freedom to take part in decision making. It will be impossible to control workers’ movements entirely.